We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and DX SaaS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the universality of their functionalities in all Azure services, including, software solutions."
"It is a move-in powerful feature compared to other market-leading tools."
"The most valuable features of Azure Monitor are the login analytics workspace and we can write any kind of custom queries in order to receive the data that is inserted into the login analytics workspace, diagnostic settings, et cetera."
"The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."
"Among the valuable features of this solution, Application Insights stands out as one of the most significant. It provides insights into application performance and helps identify issues and bottlenecks."
"The upside to the solution is if you are working in a Microsoft or Azure environment, it makes things easier."
"Technical support is helpful."
"Recently, they have improved their integration with other resources, so we get even more robust data."
"DX allows you to customize and gives you a high degree of control."
"It supports numerous platforms."
"Actionable insight is the most valuable feature."
"The scalability could be improved as there are some limitations."
"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."
"We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own."
"Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."
"I need connectivity with cost management."
"It's really complex to retrieve or query the logs in Azure Monitor."
"They should include advanced logging on the database level in the Azure pool."
"There is room for improvement in stability."
"DX SaaS is a latecomer to the APM market. Some things that are straightforward in Dynatrace are complicated in DX. For example, upgrading the agents is a seamless process in Dynatrace, but it's a pain in DX SaaS. You should be able to upgrade in the Application Command Center. However, it is not working correctly."
"The ability to scale presents a challenge as the cost of handling vast amounts of data in the cloud must be taken into account."
"Old user interface and dashboards could be improved."
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while DX SaaS is ranked 49th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 3 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while DX SaaS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DX SaaS writes "It's highly customizable but lacks many features of available in competing solutions". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas DX SaaS is most compared with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, Zabbix, Nagios XI and Dynatrace. See our Azure Monitor vs. DX SaaS report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.