We performed a comparison between Appian and Software AG ARIS Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Process Mining."The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The tool is very flexible."
"It reduces development time in half making us more efficient."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"Appian is a very low code platform. It's very easy to learn and use."
"I find the BPM the most valuable feature."
"The Application Designer is very user friendly. There are also lot of plug-ins that you can use and, for the most part, they are free."
"I have found Software AG ARIS Process Mining scalable."
"The interface is simplified and easy to use."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the setup a nine."
"One feature I found really cool was the Conformance Engine."
"It is very easy to work on the way the ETL happens in ARIS Process Mining."
"It needs better integration with our existing application ecosystem."
"The product’s pricing could be improved from the developers' perspective."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"The tool itself is pretty good, but the main area that we struggled with was the backend. The frontend development is really good, but the backend modeling can be streamlined a little bit. There are good integrations, but tying them through the data layer and then up into the frontend could be improved a little bit. It does read/write on the data source, and you can configure it to just write or just read, but there is a little bit of work involved."
"The solution could improve robotic process automation."
"Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"Customizing KPIs and building dashboards were not as intuitive as other similar tools."
"When the process models are transferred back to the design environment for further optimization and simulations, we need to see some improvements in the way the models get created in the design."
"The installation is straightforward, we didn't have any technical issues with installing. However, we needed support to complete the implementation."
"There should be a single site for modeling and mining."
"I guess we have many unnecessary steps within our processes. There is room for automation and room for enhancement within our application portfolio management...In short, I would like to eliminate unnecessary steps in some processes in this solution."
More Software AG ARIS Process Mining Pricing and Cost Advice →
Appian is ranked 5th in Process Mining with 58 reviews while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is ranked 7th in Process Mining with 6 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Software AG ARIS Process Mining writes "An easy-to-use interface with quite good learning center and documentation". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas Software AG ARIS Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining and Anaplan.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
