We performed a comparison between Software AG ARIS Process Mining and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Mining solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One feature I found really cool was the Conformance Engine."
"I have found Software AG ARIS Process Mining scalable."
"It is very easy to work on the way the ETL happens in ARIS Process Mining."
"The interface is simplified and easy to use."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the setup a nine."
"The solution is scalable and user-friendly."
"We find the solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature of UiPath Process Mining is the process graph, which gives you a depiction of the process and lets you know where the issues and delays are occurring."
"For us, the most important feature of UiPath Process Mining is something called Document Understanding. We have found it to be extremely valuable, given that the current situation we have right now is that it's not just pure automation of manual and repetitive tasks. What we're doing is more along the lines of what you could call "intelligent" automation. Document Understanding plays a great role in this type of process automation because it helps us in automating the reading of documents better and, therefore, helps to automate intelligence for our customers."
"The most valuable feature is that activities are available to us just by clicking the box, so it doesn't require much time to make changes for future requirements."
"Technical support is quite helpful and responsive."
"The best feature of UiPath Process Mining, compared to a process discovery tool or mining tool I forgot the name of, is that UiPath Process Mining supplies more details about your current workflow and how it influences the business, including what's the delay or roadblock. The other tool doesn't give you detailed information, so UiPath Process Mining has a significant advantage."
"We find the solution to be really easy not just for development purposes, but also for its use and ability to be understood."
"Customizing KPIs and building dashboards were not as intuitive as other similar tools."
"There should be a single site for modeling and mining."
"I guess we have many unnecessary steps within our processes. There is room for automation and room for enhancement within our application portfolio management...In short, I would like to eliminate unnecessary steps in some processes in this solution."
"The installation is straightforward, we didn't have any technical issues with installing. However, we needed support to complete the implementation."
"When the process models are transferred back to the design environment for further optimization and simulations, we need to see some improvements in the way the models get created in the design."
"Has a very limited way of collecting process data."
"Setting up UiPath is relatively complex. It potentially involves multiple business units. First, you need to set up the connectors. If you want to analyze enterprise performance, you will have to do enterprise connectors, which means you must deal with different system owners, security, and things like that. That can get complicated."
"The product has to be simplified because there are some facets that are just too complex. It's not easy for everyone to understand. You have to do training on ProcessGold and then you can use it."
"We may need additional features for processing data."
"The user code feature could be improved."
"In terms of what can be improved, what I've seen so far in most of the implementations is that the client's expectations towards the RPA solution and their road map for the solution are different. The road map should be very clear in terms of what should be done and why it has to be done."
"I have observed that handling a large amount of logs slows down the solution's performance."
"Integration with new technologies should be kept up-to-date so they can be adopted as they are released."
More Software AG ARIS Process Mining Pricing and Cost Advice →
Software AG ARIS Process Mining is ranked 4th in Process Mining with 6 reviews while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. Software AG ARIS Process Mining is rated 8.8, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Software AG ARIS Process Mining writes "An easy-to-use interface with quite good learning center and documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". Software AG ARIS Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Anaplan and Oracle Hyperion, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ, Minit and Tungsten Insight. See our Software AG ARIS Process Mining vs. UiPath Process Mining report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.