We performed a comparison between SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and Software AG ARIS Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Mining solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."By clearly defining process owners, customers can not only better achieve their goals but are always accountable to partners and audits."
"I like the tool's ability to visualize the entire process flow, how the process flow flows, and what deviations happen from the process flow. It also helps to figure out the process bottlenecks."
"Being able to deploy in shorter cuts."
"Predominantly, it enables financial services organizations to build up process knowledge and improve operational efficiency."
"It's easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature is the integration model."
"The product's best feature is the connection and integration between all of the capabilities."
"The product helps us build solid business use cases."
"The interface is simplified and easy to use."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the setup a nine."
"One feature I found really cool was the Conformance Engine."
"I have found Software AG ARIS Process Mining scalable."
"It is very easy to work on the way the ETL happens in ARIS Process Mining."
"Interface could be more user friendly."
"SAP has to figure out a better way to price it. Their licensing structure isn't ideal as it's based on data; therefore, it's hard to estimate client costs."
"The UI could be improved."
"When it comes to Signavio, as I've worked on Celonis, I've observed two things in Celonis and Signavio. In Celonis, using the process mining tool, we can implement automation skills. So we can take actions to improve the process as well. That is one thing."
"The product doesn't allow me to focus on a particular value stream and how the value stream performs."
"It could be more scalable."
"There could be more standard interfaces for importing data from the various systems in the process landscape."
"I would like to see a better version of the solution."
"I guess we have many unnecessary steps within our processes. There is room for automation and room for enhancement within our application portfolio management...In short, I would like to eliminate unnecessary steps in some processes in this solution."
"The installation is straightforward, we didn't have any technical issues with installing. However, we needed support to complete the implementation."
"There should be a single site for modeling and mining."
"Customizing KPIs and building dashboards were not as intuitive as other similar tools."
"When the process models are transferred back to the design environment for further optimization and simulations, we need to see some improvements in the way the models get created in the design."
More SAP Signavio Process Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Software AG ARIS Process Mining Pricing and Cost Advice →
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is ranked 6th in Process Mining with 13 reviews while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is ranked 7th in Process Mining with 6 reviews. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is rated 7.6, while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence writes "A scalable and stable tool that needs to provide its users with an exact focus on where process transformations can happen". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Software AG ARIS Process Mining writes "An easy-to-use interface with quite good learning center and documentation". SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is most compared with Celonis, UiPath Process Mining and QPR ProcessAnalyzer, whereas Software AG ARIS Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, UiPath Process Mining, Anaplan and Oracle Hyperion. See our SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs. Software AG ARIS Process Mining report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.