Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo

Top 10 Akamai Enterprise Application Access Alternatives

Vendor: Akamai
4.5 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Akamai Enterprise Application Access Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Akamai Enterprise Application Access based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, iboss, and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Akamai Enterprise Application Access surpasses its competitors by offering robust zero-trust security, seamless user experience, and comprehensive access controls, ensuring secure remote access without a VPN, which enhances operational efficiency and streamlines secure employee access to critical applications.

Akamai Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Akamai, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access provides competitive pricing, robust support, and secure remote access, making it suitable for easy integration with existing infrastructure. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID excels in advanced identity management and seamless integration with Microsoft 365, offering comprehensive features and strong security for enterprises.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a moderate setup cost while Microsoft Entra ID is known for its lower initial setup expense. The difference in setup cost could be a significant factor for initial budget considerations.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a moderate setup cost while Microsoft Entra ID is known for its lower initial setup expense. The difference in setup cost could be a significant factor for initial budget considerations.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers robust access control features and seamless integration, while iboss excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive cloud security. In comparison, Akamai's straightforward setup and active customer support stand out, while iboss provides cost efficiency and strong security features.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. iboss Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access users find the setup cost high but worth the investment, while iboss users appreciate the lower setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access users find the setup cost high but worth the investment, while iboss users appreciate the lower setup cost.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
4.1 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access is valued for its simplicity and affordability, making it suitable for quick implementations. In comparison, Prisma Access features advanced security and tool integration, targeting enterprises needing comprehensive protection, despite its higher cost and more elaborate setup process.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly at the initial stages, whereas Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher initial setup investment, reflecting its advanced feature set and targeted user base.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly at the initial stages, whereas Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher initial setup investment, reflecting its advanced feature set and targeted user base.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform
4.2 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access is preferred for integration and cost-efficiency, delivering rapid ROI. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform offers superior scalability and extensive features, making it ideal for large enterprises despite higher initial costs. Akamai excels in supportive customer service, while Zscaler provides robust support resources.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers competitive setup costs, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform may present a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers competitive setup costs, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform may present a higher initial investment.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access excels with deep security integration and customization, appealing to enterprises needing tailored solutions. In comparison, Cloudflare One focuses on intuitive deployment and a broad network, attracting those prioritizing ease of use and global capabilities for secure access.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Cloudflare One Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access is praised for its cost-effective setup, while Cloudflare One highlights its straightforward implementation process, showcasing distinct differences in initial investment and ease of deployment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access is praised for its cost-effective setup, while Cloudflare One highlights its straightforward implementation process, showcasing distinct differences in initial investment and ease of deployment between the two solutions.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Okta Platform
4.3 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Okta Platform
4.3 out of 5
Okta Platform excels in comprehensive identity management and seamless app integration, offering streamlined deployment and cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Akamai Enterprise Application Access strengthens secure remote access and zero trust security, providing a worthwhile ROI through enhanced security despite higher costs and complex setups.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Okta Platform Report
Okta Platform's setup cost is lower, providing a more budget-friendly option, whereas Akamai Enterprise Application Access involves a higher initial investment for its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Okta Platform's setup cost is lower, providing a more budget-friendly option, whereas Akamai Enterprise Application Access involves a higher initial investment for its comprehensive features.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5

Netskope provides seamless integration with existing security frameworks, offering secure web gateway and cloud security capabilities. In comparison, Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers enhanced security with strong access management and scalability, appealing to organizations prioritizing robust protection and comprehensive application visibility.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Netskope Report
Netskope offers competitive setup costs that are generally perceived as lower and smoother compared to Akamai Enterprise Application Access, which requires a more detailed and potentially costly configuration phase.
View comparison
Pricing
Netskope offers competitive setup costs that are generally perceived as lower and smoother compared to Akamai Enterprise Application Access, which requires a more detailed and potentially costly configuration phase.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
4.5 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access emphasizes robust security and ease of access, making it ideal for businesses prioritizing application performance and global scalability. In comparison, Cato SASE Cloud Platform integrates networking and security in one platform, appealing to those seeking a unified, feature-rich solution.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Cato SASE Cloud Platform Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a higher setup cost compared to Cato SASE Cloud Platform. The significant difference in setup costs makes Cato SASE more budget-friendly than Akamai for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a higher setup cost compared to Cato SASE Cloud Platform. The significant difference in setup costs makes Cato SASE more budget-friendly than Akamai for initial implementation.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps offers ease of integration and advanced threat protection, attracting those invested in Microsoft ecosystems. In comparison, Akamai Enterprise Application Access focuses on secure access and robust DDoS protection, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive security despite higher costs.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps has a straightforward setup cost, while Akamai Enterprise Application Access features a more complex pricing structure. Notably, Microsoft focuses on ease of setup, contrasting with Akamai's more intricate entry process.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps has a straightforward setup cost, while Akamai Enterprise Application Access features a more complex pricing structure. Notably, Microsoft focuses on ease of setup, contrasting with Akamai's more intricate entry process.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Cisco Duo
4.4 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Cisco Duo
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Duo is ideal for straightforward deployment and cost-effective security with reliable authentication and adaptive features. In comparison, Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers a comprehensive zero-trust model and integrated identity access management, justifying its higher cost through advanced capabilities for complex environments.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Cisco Duo Report
Cisco Duo often incurs a lower initial setup cost, making it attractive for budget-conscious users, while Akamai Enterprise Application Access may involve higher setup expenses but offers broader integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Duo often incurs a lower initial setup cost, making it attractive for budget-conscious users, while Akamai Enterprise Application Access may involve higher setup expenses but offers broader integration capabilities.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
4.4 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access is valued for its efficient application-level identity access and attractive pricing. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers comprehensive features with integrated security solutions. Akamai’s strategy appeals with cost-effectiveness, whereas Check Point promotes long-term security investments.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more cost-effective initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more cost-effective initial configuration.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)
4.2 out of 5
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) is used for remote access and connecting external users to networks. Businesses praise its user-friendliness, security features, and seamless connectivity but desire better compatibility with non-Windows systems. Frequent version updates and licensing complexity are concerns. Cost and enhancements in security are also highlighted by users.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) Report
Sometimes there is a problem with the number of licenses for the end-user. The number of concurrent users is limited due to a valid license.
The pricing depends on the requirement, so proper planning and an RF analysis help to properly size the solution and get the best pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Sometimes there is a problem with the number of licenses for the end-user. The number of concurrent users is limited due to a valid license.
The pricing depends on the requirement, so proper planning and an RF analysis help to properly size the solution and get the best pricing.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN
4.1 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers advanced security and seamless cloud integration. In comparison, VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN provides high network performance and reliability. Tech buyers might choose Akamai for cost-effective security or VMware VeloCloud for superior SD-WAN capabilities and investment returns.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access features lower setup costs compared to the comprehensive package offered by VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access features lower setup costs compared to the comprehensive package offered by VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Appgate SDP excels in security protocols and deployment flexibility, while Akamai Enterprise Application Access integrates seamlessly and offers robust threat intelligence. In comparison, Appgate SDP benefits from straightforward deployment, whereas Akamai Enterprise Application Access provides superior customer support and onboarding, making it worth its higher initial cost.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Appgate SDP Report
Appgate SDP setup cost is moderately high, while Akamai Enterprise Application Access setup cost is relatively lower but offers less flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
Appgate SDP setup cost is moderately high, while Akamai Enterprise Application Access setup cost is relatively lower but offers less flexibility.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
IBM Security Verify Access
3.9 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access is known for its scalability and ease of integration, making it a cost-effective option with robust user authentication. In comparison, IBM Security Verify Access offers comprehensive policy management and multi-factor authentication, justifying its higher cost with extensive security capabilities.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a straightforward setup cost structure, while IBM Security Verify Access is noted for a higher initial setup expense. Akamai's lower setup cost makes it appealing for cost-sensitive projects.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a straightforward setup cost structure, while IBM Security Verify Access is noted for a higher initial setup expense. Akamai's lower setup cost makes it appealing for cost-sensitive projects.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access is valued for robust security and ease of use, with comprehensive support and frequent updates. In comparison, Axis Security provides advanced features such as real-time threat detection and zero-trust network access. Axis Security offers high ROI and cost-effectiveness.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Axis Security Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a higher setup cost compared to Axis Security, which offers a more affordable initial implementation fee. Akamai's cost may reflect its extensive features, while Axis prioritizes budget-friendly integration.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a higher setup cost compared to Axis Security, which offers a more affordable initial implementation fee. Akamai's cost may reflect its extensive features, while Axis prioritizes budget-friendly integration.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Netskope Private Access
4.3 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers comprehensive security and scalability. In comparison, Netskope Private Access excels with integration capabilities and advanced policy controls. Akamai's pricing is competitive, while Netskope's robust features justify its higher cost. Akamai faces configuration challenges, whereas Netskope needs better user training resources.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Netskope Private Access Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a lower initial setup cost compared to Netskope Private Access, which requires a higher investment upfront. In contrast, Netskope offers more extensive configuration options during the initial setup period.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a lower initial setup cost compared to Netskope Private Access, which requires a higher investment upfront. In contrast, Netskope offers more extensive configuration options during the initial setup period.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Forcepoint CASB
3.6 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
Forcepoint CASB
3.6 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access focuses on simplifying secure access with a VPN-free approach, appealing to remote workforce environments. In comparison, Forcepoint CASB offers advanced data protection and threat analytics, attracting businesses prioritizing comprehensive cloud security over initial deployment simplicity.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Forcepoint CASB Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a moderate setup cost, while Forcepoint CASB requires a higher initial investment. The pricing distinction highlights Akamai's appeal to cost-conscious users compared to Forcepoint's higher entry cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a moderate setup cost, while Forcepoint CASB requires a higher initial investment. The pricing distinction highlights Akamai's appeal to cost-conscious users compared to Forcepoint's higher entry cost.
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
NetFoundry
4.5 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access Logo
NetFoundry
4.5 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access excels in user satisfaction, particularly in pricing and support. In comparison, NetFoundry's advanced feature set justifies its higher cost. Akamai is notable for robust security and straightforward deployment, while NetFoundry offers excellent performance and flexibility, with room for improved documentation.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. NetFoundry Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a straightforward setup cost, while NetFoundry involves a more flexible cost structure. Akamai's setup cost is typically fixed, whereas NetFoundry offers a scalable pricing option based on usage.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a straightforward setup cost, while NetFoundry involves a more flexible cost structure. Akamai's setup cost is typically fixed, whereas NetFoundry offers a scalable pricing option based on usage.

Related categories

ZTNA as a Service
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
Access Management