OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 12.1% |
| Apache JMeter | 12.8% |
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 10.0% |
| Other | 65.1% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Performance Testing Tools | Jan 19, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jan 19, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeter | Jan 19, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis NeoLoad | Jan 19, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter | Jan 19, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache JMeter | 3.9 | 12.8% | 88% | 96 interviewsAdd to research |
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 4.1 | 10.0% | 95% | 66 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 51 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 110 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 61 |
| Large Enterprise | 300 |
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) was previously known as Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner.
JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy | 4.5 | I've worked with OpenText LoadRunner Professional through its various iterations, currently using its cloud version on Azure. Its analysis, scalability, and multiple protocol support are commendable, though improvements in AI functionality would enhance its utility. |
| Assistant Director at Synapxe | 4.0 | I've used LoadRunner Professional for five years for performance testing; it's stable, scalable via SaaS, and easy to install. Support is excellent, though pricing is high, and I’d need my team’s input for improvement suggestions. |
| Senior Performance Analyst at EPAM Systems | 5.0 | We use OpenText LoadRunner Professional for scripting and workload modeling in finance, valuing its compatibility with C and JavaScript. While effective, it struggles with high resource utilization during heavy traffic recording. Despite this, we observe positive ROI. |
| Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway | 5.0 | I find OpenText LoadRunner Professional to be a sophisticated tool, handling complex testing for multiple applications and platforms seamlessly. The main issue is with load generators, but overall it excels compared to alternatives like JMeter and Tricentis Neoload. |
| Senior Technical Manager at Amtrak | 4.5 | We utilize OpenText LoadRunner Professional for load testing to optimize our infrastructure sizing and reduce costs. The tool offers great value, though manual coding can be time-consuming. Supporting SPAs and having a customizable dashboard would enhance its functionality further. |
| Senior Quality & Test Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | We use OpenText LoadRunner Professional for enterprise performance modeling and validation. The scripting flexibility across environments is valuable, but improvements are needed in on-premises features, data replay, and reporting, particularly in cloud deployment compared to detailed on-premises analysis. |
| Lead Performance Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I use OpenText LoadRunner Professional across multiple industries for tasks like load generation and network issue identification. The web protocol is its strongest feature, though improvements are needed for non-Windows platforms. It's cost-effective compared to alternatives like BlazeMeter. |
| Performance Architect at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I use OpenText LoadRunner Professional for load testing and system performance analysis. Its integration capabilities are valuable, but the cost and support need improvement. Mobile performance testing requires external tools, and some protocol support is lacking. |
