

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and Apache JMeter are prominent competitors in the load testing tools category. LoadRunner Professional holds an advantage with its extensive protocol support and advanced testing capabilities, especially suitable for large enterprises requiring sophisticated test scenarios.
Features: OpenText LoadRunner Professional is notable for its extensive protocol support, deep integration options for complex testing scenarios, and excellent reporting and analysis features. In contrast, Apache JMeter is praised for being open-source, intuitive, and flexible across platforms. It includes a wide array of community-backed plugins that enhance its testing capabilities.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Professional could benefit from more straightforward scripting processes, improved support for modern technologies such as mobile and cloud integration, and a reduction in licensing costs. Apache JMeter would be enhanced by user interface improvements, better scalability for handling large loads, and more robust reporting functionalities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Professional offers a comprehensive feature set that makes deployment more complex, requiring time-intensive configuration efforts. Customer service experiences vary, with some users appreciating the available resources, while others have less favorable views. Apache JMeter's open-source nature means it lacks direct vendor support but benefits from a strong community, reducing reliance on traditional support channels due to its ease of use.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Professional's high licensing costs encompass various aspects, such as protocol types and virtual users, providing value for large-scale operations by minimizing production risks and downtimes. Apache JMeter, being free, offers significant cost benefits, ideal for smaller projects. While JMeter is economical, LoadRunner delivers a higher ROI for complex testing needs.
With Apache JMeter, I have gained great statistics for performance and server metrics.
I have not seen a return on investment right now, as there is no improvement in Apache JMeter and reduction in cost, but I save time and reduce costs with Apache JMeter.
With AI models ChatGPT, troubleshooting issues has become very easy for us.
The support for Apache JMeter is excellent.
Apache JMeter has strong support through its vast Java-based community on platforms like Stack Overflow.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
The technical support is really excellent.
We do have some methods where we can distribute the complete load between multiple systems and then try to do our testing.
JMeter is highly scalable, easily handling increased loads through the use of multiple servers.
This restricts the number of users and necessitates increasing load agents or distributing the script across multiple machines.
We look at the scalability because we are using the SaaS model now.
JMeter performs exceptionally well, especially in non-GUI mode, which supports high loads efficiently.
Several necessary features still need improvements, specifically in terms of reports and additional functionalities compared to other commercial tools.
Previous versions of Apache JMeter were a little unstable, but the new versions are very stable.
I see it is stable, though there are some glitches or latency sometimes.
With AI becoming more prominent, they can implement features where it can generate code by itself based on the results or provide suggestions.
Currently, we need to use multiple separate JMeter instances to simulate reductions in load, which isn't ideal.
The tool needs improvements related to client-side metrics, integrating with tools like YSlow or HTTP Watch, and enhancing mobile testing capabilities.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
Using JMeter helps us avoid additional costs for high-load testing since it is open-source and allows for unlimited virtual users at no extra cost.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost and license are free because Apache JMeter is open source.
It's a cost-effective solution.
JMeter facilitates scripting capabilities, which include options for Groovy scripts.
It's useful for both the person conducting the test and the higher management, like project managers or senior executives, who may not know about the test.
Despite being open source, it offers features comparable to paid tools.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
The scripting language is quite comfortable for us since we are working with C and C++.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Apache JMeter | 10.4% |
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 13.6% |
| Other | 76.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 56 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
Apache JMeter is a versatile, open-source tool designed for performance and load testing, widely recognized for its user-friendly interface and robust test automation capabilities. It supports a range of protocols and integrates seamlessly into various environments, making it ideal for high-load scenarios.
Apache JMeter stands out in performance testing for its ability to handle high transactions per second and perform distributed load testing effectively. Its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness are enhanced by its user-friendly GUI, which simplifies the testing process. Despite memory consumption concerns, Apache JMeter remains a top choice due to its large community support, comprehensive scripting capabilities, and easy integration with CI/CD pipelines, allowing for continuous automated testing. Its robust protocol support meets diverse testing needs.
What are Apache JMeter's key features?In industries like finance and banking, Apache JMeter is used extensively for performance validation to ensure system robustness under heavy user loads. It's integrated into CI/CD pipelines for automated testing processes, allowing organizations to simulate real-world scenarios and ensure high-performance standards.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.