OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

OpenText and Progress Software are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Progress Software is ranked #15. OpenText holds a 13.6% mindshare in LTT, compared to Progress Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Read 81 OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

3,843 Views
2,882 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,210 Views
109 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and Telerik Test Studio are competing products in the performance testing and test automation category. LoadRunner Professional holds a stronger position due to its comprehensive testing features and extensive integration capabilities, making it suitable for complex environments.

Features: LoadRunner Professional is recognized for its high protocol support, powerful analysis tool, and robust load testing capabilities by simulating numerous users. Telerik Test Studio offers intuitive test automation, efficient script creation without deep coding knowledge, and excellent PDF validation, enhancing its usability in typical testing settings.

Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Professional could improve user experience and simplify its real-time performance monitoring dashboard. Additionally, expanding support for newly emerging web technologies is needed. Test Studio benefits from enhancing its reporting tools, increasing support for various protocols, and reducing the tool's resource consumption to handle more extensive tests efficiently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio provides straightforward deployment suitable for teams with limited IT infrastructure, complemented by solid customer support. In contrast, LoadRunner Professional has a complex deployment process geared towards enterprises, with strong customer service support facilitating large-scale operations.

Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Professional entails a higher initial cost but promises substantial ROI through its advanced testing and integration benefits suited for enterprises with intricate needs. Telerik Test Studio offers attractive pricing with quick setup, ensuring fast ROI, appealing more to teams focusing on flexible and accessible test automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Telerik Test Studio

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (4th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (24th), Regression Testing Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is 13.6%, up from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

HelenSague

Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway

A sophisticated tool that supports many languages and works with all kinds of applications

I do not have any big challenges with LoadRunner. I only have some issues with load generators. It is a very common issue, and I hope it will be resolved in the latest release. For example, when we start to run our tests, users get the message that the load generator exceeded 80% of the CPU utilization. Even when the number of users is less, we get these messages. I am trying to resolve it, but it is not going. It is annoying. It is not a failure, but I hope that it will be resolved. IBM WebSphere MQ testing can be a bit challenging. It can handle that, but I hope that they will build more and more capabilities. We do a huge amount of testing for messaging. Just like aviation, the railway industry is based on messaging. There is messaging to build trains and messaging to create some bills. There are many train movements. Everything involves messaging. I wish that it will be developed more for IBM WebSphere testing. Monitoring is okay, but for testing, I currently have to create Java users. I have to load a lot of libraries from IBM WebSphere and so on.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like LoadRunner's ability to use multiple protocols. That's one of the greatest features along with the ability to test service calls between the app and server."

"LoadRunner is a very systematic tool for anyone to use. Even someone who is actually a first time user of LoadRunner can actually get a lot of benefit out of the tool."

"The solution is quite stable."

"We don't find any features lacking. One of the most beneficial points we have from LoadRunner is we start sizing our infrastructure accordingly. So what we do is when we deploy a new workload, we do performance testing."

"My favorite feature in LoadRunner Professional is its ability to group scripts under separate IDs."

"LoadRunner Professional allowed us to load test potential new payroll solutions that would be implemented throughout the entire organization so that we knew which was best suited to performing well under pressure."

"I appreciate its ability to handle various internal calls and its user-friendly interface."

"I think that analytics is very good and that the analytics features are very powerful."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pros

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

Cons

"The solution is very costly. The cost is very high, especially considering a lot of other resources are available now and they are less expensive. For a small organization, it is very difficult to sustain the costs involved in having the solution or the related fees"

"Micro Focus has two separate products for web and mobile applications, which means you have to invest in both."

"Support for Microsoft Dynamics needs improvement."

"There's a reporting part of the cloud that could be improved a little bit."

"LoadRunner experiences high resource utilization. Even though we have machines with higher configurations, I've observed this behavior. Heavy traffic recording results in the tool hanging. So heavy traffic recording makes the tool slow."

"Improvement wise, the pipeline should be enabled. It should be embedded as part of the tool itself rather than going with third-party tools. Monitoring should be more effective as well."

"I would like the solution to include monitoring capacity."

"Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional can improve the implementation of digital areas, such as digital testing, UI and native application, and native mobile applications."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) cons

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"LoadRunner is more expensive than some competing products."

"I would still consider LoadRunner as an expensive tool and you get a LoadRunner and the Performance Center."

"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise's pricing is reasonable."

"It is a high-cost investment, particularly for companies with small budgets or limited testing needs."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is a high price, I rate the solution a five."

"When you compare the cost of other tools such as NeoLoad and LoadNinja, the cost of LoadRunner is on the expensive side. As a result, we are currently considering going with NeoLoad."

"The licensing fees are based on the number of users."

"LoadRunner Professional's licensing costs are on the higher side, apart from the Community Edition."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which helps us understand and meet SLAs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

The pricing should be reduced and made more competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I would like to improve OpenText LoadRunner Professional based on what we discussed in our last discussion, as those points remain similar and applicable. For future updates, I would like to see th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 13% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI Performance vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 29% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 19% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 9% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

August 2025

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

August 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner

No data available

Overview

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?

Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.

What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?

Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Telerik Test Studio

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.