OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and OpenText Core Performance Engineering are competing in the performance testing tools category. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has the upper hand in feature comprehensiveness, whereas OpenText Core Performance Engineering excels in cloud functionality.
Features: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering includes extensive protocol support, robust scripting tools, and powerful analysis capabilities, making it suitable for diagnosing performance issues efficiently. OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers high scalability, user-friendliness, and quick setup for ease of testing across distributed systems, focusing on agility and cost-effectiveness.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering could improve in ease of use and cost management, and simplifying scripting would make it more accessible. OpenText Core Performance Engineering needs enhancements in analytical depth, customization of reports, and handling complex testing scenarios to better support its cloud-based versatility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment for OpenText Professional Performance Engineering can be complex due to on-premise and private cloud use, although customer service is strong, support availability varies. OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers smoother deployment via public and hybrid cloud options with similar customer service issues, particularly in responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is costly, making ROI challenging for small-scale users despite long-term benefits from its robust features. OpenText Core Performance Engineering's flexible pay-as-you-go model is more appealing for dynamic usage, balancing investment with reduced infrastructure management costs.
LoadRunner Cloud helps with risk elimination by reducing performance degradation in production, ensuring a better end-user experience.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
The technical support is really excellent.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
The solution is highly scalable, which is its main feature.
We look at the scalability because we are using the SaaS model now.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
I see it is stable, though there are some glitches or latency sometimes.
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
It would also be convenient if there were options to convert scripts from competitor tools like NeoLoad to LoadRunner.
I expect an improvement in the cloud location offering to better serve local applications, particularly to enhance testing accuracy for users in regions like Thailand.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
A significant difference is in its depth of analysis.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines.
We can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times.
The scripting language is quite comfortable for us since we are working with C and C++.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 13.7% |
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) | 9.2% |
Other | 77.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 6 |
Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
Large Enterprise | 29 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 17 |
Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
Large Enterprise | 66 |
OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.
What are the key features?Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.