LoadRunner Professional and LoadRunner Cloud are leading competitors in the performance testing category. LoadRunner Professional appears advantageous for detailed performance analysis, whereas LoadRunner Cloud excels in scalability and ease of deployment.
Features: LoadRunner Professional offers powerful scripting tools, extensive protocol support, and advanced system monitoring, ideal for enterprises that require complex testing. LoadRunner Cloud simplifies testing with a user-friendly interface, ease of cloud deployment, and flexible scaling options, making it accessible for fast-paced projects.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Professional could improve with a simpler interface, lower costs, and enhanced protocol integration. LoadRunner Cloud might benefit from more flexible custom reporting, improved backward compatibility, and advanced load pattern capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Professional requires on-premises or hybrid setups, which can complicate deployment. LoadRunner Cloud offers seamless integration for public and hybrid cloud environments, reducing infrastructure burdens. Support for LoadRunner Professional can be inconsistent, while LoadRunner Cloud is generally praised for responsive and efficient support.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Professional's pricing is high but often justified by its robust features for large enterprises. LoadRunner Cloud offers a more flexible pay-as-you-go model, appealing for agile and scalable testing, though it can still be expensive compared to alternatives. Both solutions provide significant ROI through enhanced testing efficiency and preemptive issue detection.
LoadRunner Cloud helps with risk elimination by reducing performance degradation in production, ensuring a better end-user experience.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
The solution is highly scalable, which is its main feature.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
It would also be convenient if there were options to convert scripts from competitor tools like NeoLoad to LoadRunner.
I expect an improvement in the cloud location offering to better serve local applications, particularly to enhance testing accuracy for users in regions like Thailand.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
A significant difference is in its depth of analysis.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines.
We can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.
What are the key features?Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.