Top 10 OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

81 reviews
94% willing to recommend

3,036 followers

Top OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, and Perfecto. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) surpasses its competitors by providing advanced load testing, robust analytics, and seamless integrations with popular development tools, ensuring optimal application performance and scalability across diverse environments.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Apache JMeter

3.9 out of 5

Apache JMeter

3.9 out of 5

OpenText LoadRunner Professional is favored for its extensive protocol support and comprehensive analysis tools, suitable for complex testing needs. In comparison, Apache JMeter is chosen for its cost-effectiveness and ease of use in simpler scenarios, aided by its open-source nature and flexible plugin support.

Download Apache JMeter vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Report

Pricing

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) incurs significant initial setup costs, whereas Apache JMeter offers a low-cost setup, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two performance testing solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis NeoLoad

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis NeoLoad

4.1 out of 5

LoadRunner Professional offers extensive protocol support, appealing to tech buyers needing robust scripting and analysis. In comparison, NeoLoad's ease of use and CI/CD integration attracts those valuing adaptability, with more cost-effective options suitable for diverse deployment needs.

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report

Pricing

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) has a significant setup cost, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad presents a more economical setup option, highlighting a clear cost differential between the two performance testing solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Perfecto

4.2 out of 5

Perfecto

4.2 out of 5

LoadRunner impresses with extensive protocol support and analytics, ideal for large-scale simulations. In comparison, Perfecto excels in cloud-based testing on real devices, emphasizing mobile testing and cross-platform flexibility, appealing to those prioritizing ease of integration and mobile testing capabilities.

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Perfecto Report

Pricing

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has a higher setup cost than Perfecto, reflecting its advanced capabilities. Perfecto offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to enterprises seeking lower initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

BlazeMeter

4.1 out of 5

BlazeMeter

4.1 out of 5

BlazeMeter attracts buyers with its global scalability and integration with open source tools, simplifying cloud-based load testing. In comparison, LoadRunner's powerful scripting and protocol support draw attention for managing complex scenarios, though it involves more intricate setups and higher pricing.

Download BlazeMeter vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Report

Pricing

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) requires a significant setup investment, whereas BlazeMeter is more budget-friendly with lower setup costs, highlighting notable differences in initial financial commitments.

View comparison

Pricing

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in scripting and broad protocol support but is complex and costly. In comparison, ReadyAPI is user-friendly with flexible pricing. Both offer deployment flexibility, though LoadRunner targets performance needs and ReadyAPI emphasizes API testing with seamless CI/CD integration.

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. ReadyAPI Report

Pricing

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering requires a notable initial investment, whereas ReadyAPI offers a more cost-effective setup. The setup cost for LoadRunner Professional is higher, highlighting a key difference between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Application Testing Suite

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Application Testing Suite

3.9 out of 5

OpenText LoadRunner Professional offers a robust scripting engine and extensive protocol support for complex testing, appealing to those requiring detailed analysis. In comparison, Oracle Application Testing Suite integrates seamlessly with Oracle applications, providing an efficient automation framework suitable for Oracle-centric environments.

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report

Pricing

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) has a straightforward setup process, making it accessible for quick deployment, while Oracle Application Testing Suite involves a more complex setup that might require additional resources and planning.

View comparison

Pricing

Appvance AIQ Platform

4.0 out of 5

Appvance AIQ Platform

4.0 out of 5

LoadRunner Professional provides robust testing capabilities with extensive protocol support, ideal for detailed work. In comparison, Appvance AIQ offers an AI-driven approach for efficient test creation, appealing to organizations favoring innovation and agile deployment.

Pricing

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering often has a higher setup cost compared to Appvance AIQ Platform, which generally offers a more accessible initial pricing structure. This difference can significantly impact budget allocation for businesses considering performance testing so...

View comparison

Pricing

Eggplant Performance

3.9 out of 5

Eggplant Performance

3.9 out of 5

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering excels in pricing and robust analytics, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Eggplant Performance impresses with AI-driven features and integration flexibility, attracting those seeking cutting-edge solutions. Eggplant offers ease of deployment, while LoadRunner Professional requires more technical expertise.

Download Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Report

Pricing

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has a lower setup cost compared to Eggplant Performance, which involves higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has a lower setup cost compared to Eggplant Performance, which involves higher initial investment.

RadView WebLOAD

4.1 out of 5

RadView WebLOAD

4.1 out of 5

LoadRunner Professional excels with broad protocol support and integration options, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, WebLOAD appeals with ease of use and cost-effective scalability, catering to budget-conscious businesses seeking simplicity and efficiency in their performance testing processes.

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. RadView WebLOAD Report

Pricing

OpenText LoadRunner Professional involves a substantial initial setup cost, while RadView WebLOAD offers a more affordable entry point. RadView's cost-effective approach contrasts with LoadRunner's premium investment, highlighting distinct financial implications for businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

Akamai CloudTest

3.8 out of 5

Akamai CloudTest

3.8 out of 5

Akamai CloudTest attracts tech buyers with real-time analytics and cloud scalability, offering quick deployment and flexible pricing. In comparison, LoadRunner Professional appeals due to its extensive protocol support and integration capabilities, providing a comprehensive solution for complex enterprise environments and long-term ROI.

Download Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Report

Pricing

Akamai CloudTest offers a straightforward setup experience with flexible pricing, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Professional involves a more complex setup process with higher initial costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Akamai CloudTest offers a straightforward setup experience with flexible pricing, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Professional involves a more complex setup process with higher initial costs.

Show 9 more products

Related categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

API Testing Tools