Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) comparison

Akamai and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Akamai holds a 2.7% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 13.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

472 Views
317 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Read 81 OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

3,405 Views
2,004 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) compete in the performance testing market. Akamai CloudTest is noted for its competitive pricing and strong customer support, whereas OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is often preferred for its comprehensive features and detailed diagnostics.

Features: Akamai CloudTest is known for real-time analytics, scalability, and seamless cloud infrastructure integration. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) stands out with its extensive protocol support, detailed performance diagnostics, and ability to handle complex system environments effectively.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could improve in broader protocol support, enhanced detailed diagnostics, and offering more in-depth analysis tools. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) may benefit from streamlining its deployment process, improving documentation for API extensions, and reducing the need for deep technical expertise for setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest offers a fast setup and robust customer support, making it suitable for simpler cloud-based deployments. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) provides comprehensive customer service with strong training resources but involves a more intricate deployment process, often requiring specialized knowledge.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest is praised for cost-effective pricing and quick time-to-value, appealing to cost-conscious users. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) offers a higher ROI in enterprise-level projects despite a steeper initial cost, with substantial returns for in-depth performance capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

9th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

4th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 2.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is 13.9%, up from 13.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at Publicis Sapient

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

HelenSague

Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway

A sophisticated tool that supports many languages and works with all kinds of applications

I do not have any big challenges with LoadRunner. I only have some issues with load generators. It is a very common issue, and I hope it will be resolved in the latest release. For example, when we start to run our tests, users get the message that the load generator exceeded 80% of the CPU utilization. Even when the number of users is less, we get these messages. I am trying to resolve it, but it is not going. It is annoying. It is not a failure, but I hope that it will be resolved. IBM WebSphere MQ testing can be a bit challenging. It can handle that, but I hope that they will build more and more capabilities. We do a huge amount of testing for messaging. Just like aviation, the railway industry is based on messaging. There is messaging to build trains and messaging to create some bills. There are many train movements. Everything involves messaging. I wish that it will be developed more for IBM WebSphere testing. Monitoring is okay, but for testing, I currently have to create Java users. I have to load a lot of libraries from IBM WebSphere and so on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"The solution is very stable."

"It uses high-level languages like Java, CVC, and CCL."

"I like the user interface. I like the way we can divide our scenarios and can tune them. The integration with the quality center is great. These features are really good."

"LoadRunner is a very sophisticated tool, and I can use many languages. For example, I can use Java. I can use C++. I can test the Internet of Things, FTP, mail, and Active Directory. It is very useful."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"It is a good and stable tool."

"It is actually a very good tool because it will support almost all, if not all, industry-standard protocols, and it is also equipped with very nice reporting capabilities, which is why I like it."

"The reporting mechanism is a valuable feature that generates good reports."

"I appreciate its ability to handle various internal calls and its user-friendly interface."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pros

Cons

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"I recently just got to see LoadRunner Developer, but it is still not fully developed to use."

"The price of this solution should be cheaper."

"Technical support needs to be faster, and the pricing should be more competitive."

"You should be able to use LoadRunner as a single platform. You should be able to have browser based access. You should be able to run enterprise tests."

"Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional can improve the implementation of digital areas, such as digital testing, UI and native application, and native mobile applications."

"The tool needs to work on capture script feature."

"The pricing could be lower."

"The monitoring technology in LoadRunner could be improved. It depends on another tool called SiteScope, but they only took a part of the features of SiteScope. They need to improve on that."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Running cost is very low."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The licensing model is complex. You have to pick up the protocol and the number of concurrent users, and then select the level of concurrent users. For example, there would be one price for 100 to 500 users and another for 500 to 2000 users. If you choose two protocols, then you will have to pay twice the amount depending on the number of concurrent users."

"Pricing depends on our choices because it depends on what type of protocol we are getting, what type of licensing we are getting, and what kind of relationships we have with HP and Micro Focus."

"There is a licensing cost that is expensive."

"It is a high-cost investment, particularly for companies with small budgets or limited testing needs."

"For licensing, we pay a lot for it. But the incentive is the support we get with it, that we pay once, and we are set."

"It is competing with other products that may cost significantly less or may be available as open-source. Because of that it is relatively expensive."

"The fee for LoadRunner Professional is very high - about US$500 per user."

"The pricing model and the software licensing model could be better."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which helps us understand and meet SLAs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

The pricing should be reduced and made more competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I would like to improve OpenText LoadRunner Professional based on what we discussed in our last discussion, as those points remain similar and applicable. For future updates, I would like to see th...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 38% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 13% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 30% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 14% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

June 2025

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

May 2025

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner

Overview

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

Akamai

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?

Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.

What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?

Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

May 2025

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.