OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and BlazeMeter compete in the field of performance testing. Based on the data, BlazeMeter seems to have the upper hand due to its cloud-based flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
Features: LoadRunner Professional provides powerful scripting tools, extensive protocol support, and advanced analysis capabilities. It supports versatile testing scenarios and detailed system monitoring. BlazeMeter is known for its cloud-based flexibility, integration with open-source tools like JMeter, and ease of use in crafting realistic test scenarios. It supports global load testing and easy platform integration.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner's complexity, high resource requirements, and cost are significant drawbacks. It also faces challenges with integrations and test flexibility. BlazeMeter's pricing and test performance issues are points of criticism. Improvements are needed in custom reporting, APM tool integration, and test scalability documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner generally requires complex on-premises setups which demand extensive resources. Customer service reviews are mixed, with some mentions of delays. BlazeMeter offers more agile cloud deployment options, enhancing flexibility. Its customer support is positively reviewed, though improvements in responsiveness and technical guidance are desired.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner is expensive, with costs linked to protocol types and virtual users, but users recognize the tool's value in application performance insights. BlazeMeter provides flexible pricing, often viewed as more affordable, and reduces infrastructure burdens. Its consumption-based pricing plans are appreciated alongside its extensive features and integration potential.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
