I am in the process of selecting a tool for automating wsdl files. I wanted to know about the pros and cons of SOAtest, and also how it compares with SoapUI NG pro.
Anonymous User at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
2015-02-02T04:02:11Z
Feb 2, 2015
Hi
I have not done a comparison between these tools. I would go with open source tools if there are any at this point. If you need virtuailization, then select your tool based on that criteria.
User at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
MSP
2015-01-27T20:21:37Z
Jan 27, 2015
I think the last version of neoload (Neoload5) is able to do this. See the NeoLoad 5.0 Technical Publications: http://www.neotys.com/documents/doc/neoload/latest/en/html/#843.htm
It depends on what kind of testing you want to perform,if it is basic webservice testing with less complexity,SOAP UI suits well.SOAP UI has many APIs, which to prepare automation framework .A development experience is required for that to some extent.In Parasoft SOAtest,very less scripting is required as it itself provides a automation framework.Its easy to use and can be used without any training, with the help of user guide.But again scripting is required for complex scenarios based on the project.
If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering SoapUI Pro, what would you say? How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?
Digital Bank-QA and DevOps Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dec 30, 2019
I would recommend this solution. You should proceed and know that communication is very easy to use, and it's user-friendly. There is a lot of support online. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
SmartBear LoadNinja is a great all-in-one test automation tool. Here are some reasons why users like it:
Speed. It is fast on almost any machine.
Configuration consistency.
Accuracy of tests with fantastic results.
Great AI features with good cloud scaling.
Artificial intelligence.
The automation is very good.
An application can be tested across many programs with ease. For example, ...
PeerSpot’s crowdsourced user review platform helps technology decision-makers around the world to better connect with peers and other independent experts who provide advice without vendor bias.
Our users have ranked these solutions according to their valuable features, and discuss which features they like most and why.
You can read user reviews for the Top 5 Performance Testing Tools to help ...
https://www.scribd.com/doc/178422270/Soapui-vs-Soatest-comparison#scribd
Hi
I have not done a comparison between these tools. I would go with open source tools if there are any at this point. If you need virtuailization, then select your tool based on that criteria.
I think the last version of neoload (Neoload5) is able to do this. See the NeoLoad 5.0 Technical Publications: http://www.neotys.com/documents/doc/neoload/latest/en/html/#843.htm
You may want to try LoadRunner, and particularly LoadRunner's Web Services protocol. It has full support for SOAP, WSDL and other related standards.
It depends on what kind of testing you want to perform,if it is basic webservice testing with less complexity,SOAP UI suits well.SOAP UI has many APIs, which to prepare automation framework .A development experience is required for that to some extent.In Parasoft SOAtest,very less scripting is required as it itself provides a automation framework.Its easy to use and can be used without any training, with the help of user guide.But again scripting is required for complex scenarios based on the project.
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/SOATest-vs-SoapUI-1007537.S.90427166
In our case the Smart bear products did not pass our security requirements/criteria for a 3rd party load testing vendor.