Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Alfresco?

Get the report
Helped 884,266 peers since 2012

Featured Alfresco reviews

Alfresco mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of Alfresco in the Enterprise Content Management category stands at 7.6%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Alfresco7.6%
SharePoint11.6%
OpenText Content Management8.0%
Other72.8%
Enterprise Content Management

PeerResearch reports based on Alfresco reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEnterprise Content ManagementMar 17, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 17, 2026Download
ComparisonAlfresco vs SharePointMar 17, 2026Download
ComparisonAlfresco vs IBM FileNetMar 17, 2026Download
ComparisonAlfresco vs Adobe Experience ManagerMar 17, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
SharePoint3.911.6%79%164 interviewsAdd to research
Hyland OnBase4.15.7%100%17 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 17, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business111
Midsize Enterprise59
Large Enterprise257
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Insurance Company
4%
Media Company
4%
University
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Performing Arts
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
2%
Retailer
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Construction Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
 
Alfresco Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Human Resources Specialist at Unilever Inc.4.5I’ve used Alfresco for six years to manage high-volume customer documents; it’s stable, scalable, searchable, and highly customizable with strong REST integrations, saving costs and boosting sales. REST scheduling, Activiti docs, and legacy SOAP support need improvement.
Software Engineer at Procter & Gamble4.5I use Alfresco Content Services as a unified ECM for document storage, metadata, workflows, and integrations. It’s stable, scalable, cost-effective, and supports paperless collaboration. I’d like direct scanning, better UI polish, and more social platform integration.
Country Head Spain at Apiux4.0We use Alfresco to store transaction-related documents, valuing its persistent document-linking and customizability. While its storage method is a security concern, it offers efficient document management, providing significant ROI compared to solutions like FileNet, SharePoint, and OpenText.
Network Engineer at AT&T4.5I use Alfresco to manage and share engineering documents, prints, and invoices across departments, improving collaboration and shop-floor information flow. It’s stable, scalable, configurable, and cost-effective, with responsive support and strong scripting/APIs, though I’d like more APIs and new features.
Technical Project Manager at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0Alfresco effectively consolidates unstructured document management with customizable workflows and extensive APIs. Though documentation and workflow features have improved, challenges in workflow customization and system governance remain. Proper governance is crucial to avoid performance issues caused by improper document handling.
Head Of Information Technology at a consultancy with 11-50 employees3.0We used Alfresco for document management, focusing on automating manual forms. Its integration, search capability, and metadata storage were valuable. However, improvements are needed in workflow digitalization and AI. We switched to SharePoint due to cost-effectiveness with Office 365.
Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees2.5I primarily use Alfresco for document look-up, but it's less user-friendly than Nautilus, which I preferred due to familiarity with its setup. While Alfresco offers extensive search capabilities, its configuration is challenging and index fields are unintuitive.
Head Of Information Technology at a consultancy with 11-50 employees3.0No summary available