Top 10 ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

8 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, and Recorded Future. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) surpasses its competitors by delivering robust threat analytics, seamless integration capabilities, and superior automation features that empower organizations to proactively defend against emerging cyber threats effectively.

ThreatConnect Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ThreatConnect, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive endpoint detection with AI-driven threat intelligence, excelling in deployment flexibility. In comparison, ThreatConnect TIP focuses on threat correlation and automation, appealing to users prioritizing threat intelligence management. Falcon's high cost contrasts with TIP's mid-range, challenging smaller enterprises.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with ThreatConnect TIP, which typically involves a more complex and potentially higher setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with ThreatConnect TIP, which typically involves a more complex and potentially higher setup cost.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

4.2 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

4.2 out of 5

ThreatConnect TIP offers exceptional threat intelligence gathering, enhancing data enrichment and risk assessment. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR excels with advanced automation for incident response and seamless integration, making it appealing for maximizing security efficiency through orchestration capabilities and customization options.

Download Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

ThreatConnect TIP offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR involves higher setup expenses, making the initial deployment costs notably different between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future

4.2 out of 5

Recorded Future

4.2 out of 5

Recorded Future excels in integration and customization for threat intelligence, appealing to tech buyers seeking flexible dashboards and alert systems. In comparison, ThreatConnect attracts those needing automation and scoring enhancements, with strong playbook features for response automation and internal indicator enrichment.

Download Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

Recorded Future requires a lower initial setup cost, whereas ThreatConnect TIP involves more significant upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future requires a lower initial setup cost, whereas ThreatConnect TIP involves more significant upfront expenses.

Splunk SOAR

4.0 out of 5

Splunk SOAR

4.0 out of 5

ThreatConnect TIP attracts budget-conscious buyers with its in-depth threat data management and competitive pricing. In comparison, Splunk SOAR, known for advanced automation and extensive integration, appeals to organizations seeking comprehensive support and long-term ROI benefits from initial investments.

Download Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

ThreatConnect TIP has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, making Splunk SOAR more budget-friendly with its lower initial expenditure.

View comparison

Pricing

ThreatConnect TIP has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, making Splunk SOAR more budget-friendly with its lower initial expenditure.

ZeroFOX

4.3 out of 5

ZeroFOX

4.3 out of 5

ThreatConnect TIP is known for its comprehensive integration capabilities and actionable intelligence, beneficial for those seeking extensive connectivity. In comparison, ZeroFOX focuses on social media threats, appealing to those prioritizing protection on these platforms. ThreatConnect TIP offers cost-effectiveness, while ZeroFOX's higher cost includes a broad feature set.

Download ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs. ZeroFOX Report

Pricing

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has higher setup costs, while ZeroFOX offers a more affordable initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has higher setup costs, while ZeroFOX offers a more affordable initial setup.

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System

4.0 out of 5

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System

4.0 out of 5

ThreatConnect excels with advanced threat intelligence and integration, offering extensive customization. In comparison, Trend Micro TippingPoint emphasizes robust intrusion prevention and real-time protection with streamlined defense mechanisms. ThreatConnect's in-depth features justify higher costs, while Trend Micro achieves quicker returns with effective threat protection.

Download ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Report

Pricing

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has a higher initial setup cost compared to Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, which boasts a more affordable setup for users seeking immediate cost efficiency.

View comparison

Pricing

Anomali

3.9 out of 5

Anomali

3.9 out of 5

ThreatConnect TIP excels in integrating with third-party tools through customizable dashboards. In comparison, Anomali offers detailed threat visualization and automated detection. ThreatConnect’s deployment is straightforward, while Anomali provides extensive support for complex setups, each catering to different organizational needs.

Download Anomali vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

ThreatConnect TIP incurs a higher setup cost compared to Anomali, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment when choosing between the platforms.

View comparison

Pricing

ThreatConnect TIP incurs a higher setup cost compared to Anomali, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment when choosing between the platforms.

ServiceNow Security Operations

4.0 out of 5

ServiceNow Security Operations

4.0 out of 5

ThreatConnect TIP offers advanced threat intel analysis ideal for organizations seeking automation. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations provides a comprehensive IT security management solution appealing to enterprises seeking integrated incident management and orchestration within broader IT operations.

Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) involves high setup costs, whereas ServiceNow Security Operations offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. This cost difference highlights varying budget considerations for organizations evaluating these security platforms.

View comparison

Pricing

NetWitness NDR

4.0 out of 5

NetWitness NDR

4.0 out of 5

ThreatConnect TIP offers integrations and community-driven threat intelligence for collaborative environments. In comparison, NetWitness NDR excels in network security with advanced analytics. Buyers seeking collaboration may prefer ThreatConnect, while those wanting robust network protection might choose NetWitness for cost-effectiveness and quick deployment.

Download NetWitness NDR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has an affordable setup cost, while NetWitness NDR demands a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has an affordable setup cost, while NetWitness NDR demands a higher initial investment.

Fortinet FortiSOAR

3.8 out of 5

Fortinet FortiSOAR

3.8 out of 5

ThreatConnect TIP is favored for its affordability and user-friendly deployment, enhancing threat intelligence and faster integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiSOAR appeals for advanced automation and customization, rewarding users willing to invest in comprehensive features for enhanced incident response efficiency.

Download Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) offers a structured setup cost that may appeal to established enterprises, while Fortinet FortiSOAR provides a flexible cost structure, catering to a broader range of businesses with varying budget constraints.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 13 more products

Related categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)