Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic.""The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats.""The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros →

"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it.""It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use.""ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface.""The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."

More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pros →

Cons
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present.""It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons →

"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment.""Integration is an area that could use some improvement.""I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool.""They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"

More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is expensive."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive."
  • "The price could be better."
  • "The tool is expensive."
  • More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.
    Top Answer:I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.
    Top Answer:The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.
    Top Answer:The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP.
    Top Answer:The building of playbooks could be more refined. The training is not openly available. I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool. With other tools, I could easily get… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,191
    Comparisons
    429
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    354
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    1,721
    Comparisons
    1,274
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Interactive Demo
    Overview

    AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

    The ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations (TIOps) Platform lets organizations operationalize and evolve their cyber threat intel program, enabling cybersecurity operations teams to measurably improve their organization’s resilience to attacks. The TIOps Platform enhances collaboration across teams to drive proactive threat defense, and improve threat detection and response. The AI- and automation-powered TI Ops Platform enables analysts to perform all their work effectively and efficiently in a single, unified platform, allowing threat intel to be aggregated, analyzed, prioritized, and actioned against the most relevant threats. 

    Sample Customers
    Telkom Indonesia
    Oracle, IBM, General Dynamics, Scotiabank, Sony, Athena Health, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, Workday, TikTok
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 8th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is ranked 4th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 4 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 7.8, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Impressive performance and monitoring capabilities but lacks in documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) writes "The tool could be integrated into any environment, but it was expensive, and the deployment process was complex". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with Anomali ThreatStream, VirusTotal, LogRhythm SIEM, CrowdStrike Falcon and Cisco Threat Grid, whereas ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is most compared with Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, ThreatQ, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and TruSTAR. See our Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) report.

    See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.