No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.8
Torq saves users 150% time and resources, enhancing efficiency and satisfaction, despite initial adaptation and variable pricing.
Sentiment score
4.4
Cortex XSOAR delivers high ROI by automating tasks and integrating seamlessly, ideal for mature SOCs despite initial costs.
Sentiment score
7.5
Organizations improved trust, sales, and efficiency with ThreatConnect, reducing costs and response times while mitigating false positives.
Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts. It is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert.
SOC Analyst at AppsFlyer
By the time we officially bought Torq, we already had two workflows that were very helpful to us.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
It pretty much took until we got to our first renewal where we said that this is the value we see, this is the things we want more, but that is the first place where we said we are happy enough that we want to renew.
Information Technology Specialist at a media company with 201-500 employees
We are positioning Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which can be used in the SOC and do a lot of automation for the customer.
Vice President, Technology at Cache Digitech Pvt Ltd.
We have reduced manual analyst effort by thirty to forty percent.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
This trust has led to an increase in sales because customers are confident we can protect their data.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Torq's customer service is highly rated for quick, knowledgeable support, resolving issues efficiently with comprehensive assistance and prompt solutions.
Sentiment score
6.6
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR support is responsive and knowledgeable but could improve friendliness and initial response times.
Sentiment score
7.5
ThreatConnect TIP customer service is responsive and knowledgeable, providing highly rated support despite occasional time zone delays.
The speed and quality of their answers have been pretty good, as I usually get a response within 24 hours, and they follow up well.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
We can always get an answer, and the support team are experts in their own system.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Nine out of ten times, they give me a solution even if it is not the solution I wanted, and I still can get to the result.
Information Technology Specialist at a media company with 201-500 employees
Eight out of ten times, they provide valuable help.
Lead Application Security Engineer Iv at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Their support has been better than Anomali's and they are more responsive.
Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy
The technical support provided by Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is good.
Vice President, Technology at Cache Digitech Pvt Ltd.
They have been responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
I just like their customer support because, within a short period of contacting them, they are able to help navigate issues.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Torq excels in scalability for diverse environments despite potential performance issues, gaining high ratings from multinational teams.
Sentiment score
7.1
Cortex XSOAR offers high scalability and flexibility, efficiently integrating third-party APIs despite potential complexities in large deployments.
Sentiment score
7.5
ThreatConnect TIP scales efficiently, managing data and users seamlessly, ensuring robust performance and flexibility for growing organizations.
Our case management is super scalable.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
In terms of scalability, you can do as long as you can build it, and they can support it.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Regarding the ability of the solution to grow in your work environment, if it is scalable, if it fits your business requirements, and if there is room to scale up, the answer is yes, for sure.
Global IT Director at OpenWeb
The scalability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR supports our growth and security needs because we can integrate various tools and continuously add more capability.
Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has very good application capabilities and is highly scalable.
Assistant Security Architect at Cloudnomics
The issues with scalability arise from the speed of some integrations, as not all are perfectly tuned by Palo.
Lead Application Security Engineer Iv at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
ThreatConnect supports scalability by allowing us to identify threats and share information within our team networks.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
5.8
Torq generally maintains a positive stability reputation despite occasional reports of lagging, bugs, and short-term downtime.
Sentiment score
7.5
Cortex XSOAR is considered stable, reliable, and performs well, but requires careful sizing and regular updates for optimal use.
Sentiment score
7.3
ThreatConnect TIP offers stable, reliable performance with high availability, effectively integrating with tools, despite occasional performance slowdowns.
Most of the time, the system is stable as long as the components that they integrate with are stable.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
I have never faced any downtime or issues.
Senior Information Technology Security Consultant at Mideast Data Systems
Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
The system works smoothly even when I navigate deep into the playbook section.
Assistant Security Architect at Cloudnomics
I would rate the stability and reliability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR as a nine.
Lead Application Security Engineer Iv at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Sometimes, when using the solution, it slows down, affecting our ability to mitigate threats.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Room For Improvement

Torq requires enhancements in search, alert playbooks, transparency, dashboards, AI, data presentation, error handling, and workflow navigation.
Cortex XSOAR requires improved documentation, intuitive UI, modularity, integration, costs, setup, licensing, performance, and usability for efficiency.
ThreatConnect TIP's integration, pricing, and usability challenges hinder accessibility, with users seeking improved features and easier access.
Torq should offer default templates that can directly scan firewall data and automate actions.
Senior Information Technology Security Consultant at Mideast Data Systems
It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet.
Senior Consultant at a university with 10,001+ employees
From an engineering perspective, I think more error messages and error handling information for our engineering team would be very helpful.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
The deployment requires integration and the development of integration modules.
Presale Engineer at Westcon-Comstor
One of the significant issues we encounter is system slowdown when we receive an influx of alerts, which inhibits how quickly we can access the information needed for investigation.
Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play.
Vice President, Technology at Cache Digitech Pvt Ltd.
The pricing is high for smaller organizations, so it would be beneficial to have tiered pricing.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) could be improved by simplifying the user interface to better fit day-to-day analyst workflow.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users see Torq as more costly than Zapier but valuable for its features and regular renewals occur.
Cortex XSOAR is costly but offers valuable features; small businesses may find discounts helpful in mitigating expenses.
ThreatConnect TIP is priced mid-range, potentially costly for small firms, with costs based on deployment, support, and features.
When they bring more and more value into the platform, it makes more sense to pay that price, but still, it is expensive.
Senior Cyber Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Before deciding to implement Torq, I considered that compared to our old case management platform, Torq was a much better price and had a lot better value for what you get out of the platform, which was a key consideration for the company.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
It is an expensive solution, not an inexpensive solution, but we get through the flexibility.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
For customers, it is zero versus $20 million, which is why they have to make a decision.
Vice President, Technology at Cache Digitech Pvt Ltd.
The pricing seems a bit high for smaller companies.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
Generally, the pricing and setup cost are on the higher side.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
 

Valuable Features

Torq automates workflows with a low-code interface, enhancing SecOps through AI-driven alert management and seamless system integration.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR excels in automation, integration, and ease-of-use, enhancing incident response and threat intelligence capabilities.
ThreatConnect TIP simplifies threat management with ease of use, automation, integrations, and improved detection and response capabilities.
Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management has significantly benefited us by integrating the case management platform with the automation, which saves time compared to managing multiple point solutions across our security stack.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
The fact that I can build whatever I want within my own imagination and skills without relying on code is the best thing about Torq.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
You can copy and paste a cURL command. If you have documentation or APIs, you usually have an example on the side. You basically have all the information on how the API call should be. You can just copy that and paste it into a step, and it will just build the step for you.
Global IT Director at OpenWeb
Execution of automatic tasks for collecting, enriching, and correlating security events from hundreds of different technologies.
Presale Engineer at Westcon-Comstor
If I already have an established process, I do not have to change my process to fit into the tool. I can modify the tool to fit into my process, which makes things considerably easier.
Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy
We have implemented automation features, such as automated responses to email threats and automatic configuration of target devices for blocking specific IPs.
Vice President, Technology at Cache Digitech Pvt Ltd.
The features are simple to use, and the interface is user-friendly, making it easy to navigate and apply the solutions.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
The API-first architecture that enables us to perform custom integration with other products and real-time distribution.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
 

Categories and Ranking

Torq
Sponsored
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
AI-SOC (2nd), AI-Powered Security Automation (2nd)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
SOC as a Service (2nd)
ThreatConnect Threat Intell...
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Torq is 3.7%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is 8.8%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is 3.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR8.8%
Torq3.7%
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)3.2%
Other84.3%
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

Nimrod Vardi - PeerSpot reviewer
Global IT Director at OpenWeb
Automation workflows have transformed our IT, enabling secure just-in-time access control
We work with them quite often, so we have a direct line regarding areas in Torq that have room for improvement. If we have a feature request, we can request it. I do not have anything in mind at the moment. We were a design partner for a short while, so we feel that they listen and that users of the system have an impact on the way the system is designed for the better. They have a new community, which is something that I personally suggested years ago. There are many people like me in different places and they might have already built the workflow that I need. Having the option to share workflows or to jump on a thread and say I have this need, did anyone ever build a workflow for it, is amazing. Someone would jump in and say yes, sure, here, take this workflow. I think this is an amazing thing and I really hope that the community will come alive because I think this is really powerful. This is something that I already suggested and it did happen eventually, and I am quite happy with it. I do not have any specific feature in mind that I have a need for at the moment.
Sricharan R - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Application Security Engineer Iv at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Security automation has transformed incident workflows and now reduces response time dramatically
I think the areas of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR that could be improved are mainly in UX. We have communicated with the vendor team about this, but they are prioritizing product functionality over usability because most target customers are technical and understand a primitive UI. They face difficulties in implementing UI changes as their team is stretched. Thus, the UI/UX of the tool needs significant improvement. There are plans on their roadmap, but a lot remains to be done. Parts of the tool run on an older framework, causing slowness. Usability is a broader issue than features alone. This usability problem is common in many cybersecurity tools, unlike customer-facing applications. Some integrations have speed issues and might not function seamlessly with different upstream configurations, requiring manual updates. These are the main pain points we encountered, particularly with UI/UX, integration speed, and the usability of certain inbuilt playbooks.
Nikhil Jethwa - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
Centralized threat intelligence has streamlined IOC workflows and now improves response time
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has positively impacted our organization by significantly reducing response times and improving detection accuracy by ensuring only high-confidence, context-rich indicators are pushed to security controls. From an operational standpoint, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has helped us reduce IOC handling and response time from hours to minutes by automating injection, enrichment, and distribution workflows.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
894,998 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise26
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise23
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?
This is exactly what we discussed two days ago with the Torq team. We told them where we want to see improvements. Fo...
What is your primary use case for Torq?
I use Torq as my case management and alert system. Working as a SOC analyst, the first thing I do every morning is ge...
What advice do you have for others considering Torq?
I would definitely recommend Torq. I have no doubt, really. When we looked for another vendor, Torq really answered a...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Comparing pricing to Micro Focus, they were offering bundles, making it free with their SIEM. For customers, it is ze...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Regarding areas for improvement in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, I want to highlight one concern about playbook cr...
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
My primary use cases for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR are malware incidents, specifically phishing-related inciden...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
My experience with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that...
What needs improvement with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
Based on my experience, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is already doing a great job in the market b...
What is your primary use case for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
Our main use case for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is to centralize, analyze, and operationalize ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Customer Case Studies & Use Cases
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
894,998 professionals have used our research since 2012.