Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
SOC as a Service (2nd)
ThreatConnect Threat Intell...
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is 13.3%, down from 16.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is 1.6%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Unique Categories:
SOC as a Service
45.5%
Threat Intelligence Platforms
7.2%
 

Featured Reviews

Donald Keeber - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 1, 2024
Got what I needed, but not what I wanted
I want to make note that it seems like Palo Alto Networks is moving to a full A La-cart licensing model where just about every feature in the product has a separate key and license to purchase/maintain and monitor. I have had firewalls bricked because it became cost prohibitive to license them. Once licenses expire, the firewall virtually stops operating as anything more than a router. With Cortex specifically, it's the poor platform based logging. I can generate logs for individual users, but there is little platform data available from either the client or the Dashboard. Also, having to maintain GP and Cortex on the same machines makes life more complicated as there are two seperate controls that need to be managed, licensed and monitored. I would like to see a day when GP and Cortex are one and the same with feature switches to enable/disable functionality
SC
Nov 27, 2023
The tool could be integrated into any environment, but it was expensive, and the deployment process was complex
The solution was used for publishing artefacts and threat intel data. We gathered data from the internet and uploaded it to the platform. It was integrated into every aspect of our cybersecurity network, like endpoints, SOC management, patch management, and vulnerability management tools TIP and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The drag-and-drop interface enables analysts with no programming knowledge to create playbooks easily."
"It’s easy to install."
"I am satisfied with the product overall."
"I have no complaints about Cortex's stability."
"Many different playbooks are available and can be customized."
"The repository of playbooks and the integration between Palo Alto and IBM QRadar are some useful features"
"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration."
"The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR are the remote controller from the workstation that can execute commands and isolate the systems outside of the network. Only the system with an internet connection can execute the task because the main console is in the cloud."
"The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."
"The tool's installation, integration, and playbooks are very straightforward."
"It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use."
"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."
 

Cons

"The solution should be made a bit cheaper."
"I would love to see more flexibility on what we can display and design on the dashboards."
"Corex XSOAR could be improved by reducing the time it takes to process large amounts of data and increasing the number of integrations."
"The dashboard could be better."
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the Panorama feature. We had to turn it off because it was not working properly."
"With Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, managing its setup phase can be a complicated task."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the look, feel, and management of the cloud console. Additionally, the user could be more easily integrated."
"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"
"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."
"I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool."
"Support is an area with which nobody is ever fully satisfied, so it can be improved."
"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Palo Alto offers significant discounts to customers who purchase the products repeatedly."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could be reduced. We are always looking for a discount. There is an annual license needed to use this solution."
"When I first looked at Demisto, it had a price tag of $250,000 but when we finally purchased it, it was $345,000."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is expensive."
"The solution is based on an annual licensing model that is expensive."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing a nine."
"The solution's pricing needs improvement."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is comparable to other solutions in the market."
"The price could be better."
"I rate the product price as six on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten means it is cheap."
"The tool is expensive."
"The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Whether the product is cheap or expensive depends on the company and how much they are willing to spend on security. Nowadays, security is important. The solution is not suitable for small business...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
The solution is complicated to learn. Customers find it difficult to learn how the solution works. We need professionals to learn and understand how the tool works to expand it further. Our custome...
What do you like most about ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
The tool's prices are at par when compared to the other products in the market, so it is not uber-premium or too pricey. I rate the product price as six on a scale of one to ten, where one is extre...
What needs improvement with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) needs to develop its SOAR platform because it currently doesn't position or connect itself as a SOAR tool, even though it has at least 60 percent of...
 

Also Known As

Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Interactive Demo

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Oracle, IBM, General Dynamics, Scotiabank, Sony, Athena Health, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, Workday, TikTok
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.