Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Intune Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Intune Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Microsoft Intune Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Intune based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Workspace ONE UEM, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, and Jamf Pro. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Microsoft Intune surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, allowing comprehensive device management, advanced security policies, and simplified application deployment, making it an essential tool for enterprises prioritizing security and efficiency in their mobile device management strategies.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Intune Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels with its integration in a Microsoft ecosystem, ideal for organizations invested in Microsoft products. In comparison, Workspace ONE UEM supports diverse devices, making it suitable for heterogeneous environments. Workspace ONE's cost may limit adoption compared to Intune's value in Microsoft contexts.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Workspace ONE UEM Report
Microsoft Intune has a lower setup cost than Workspace ONE UEM, highlighting its affordability advantage. Conversely, Workspace ONE UEM incurs higher initial expenses but may offer more comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a lower setup cost than Workspace ONE UEM, highlighting its affordability advantage. Conversely, Workspace ONE UEM incurs higher initial expenses but may offer more comprehensive features.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers simplicity and agentless architecture, appealing for scalable automation tasks. In comparison, Microsoft Intune integrates with Microsoft 365, benefiting environments using Microsoft's ecosystem. Each solution provides unique advantages tailored to specific operational needs.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform incurs a higher setup cost, whereas Microsoft Intune offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform incurs a higher setup cost, whereas Microsoft Intune offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Jamf Pro
4.8 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Jamf Pro
4.8 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels with seamless integration in Microsoft environments, offering broad device support. In comparison, Jamf Pro focuses on Apple devices with specialized management features. Intune is cost-effective with Microsoft bundles, while Jamf delivers dedicated Apple solutions, enhancing efficiency for Apple ecosystems.
Download Jamf Pro vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward and minimal setup cost ideal for budget-conscious users, while Jamf Pro involves a higher investment with advanced features for Apple device management, highlighting a significant focus on specialized functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward and minimal setup cost ideal for budget-conscious users, while Jamf Pro involves a higher investment with advanced features for Apple device management, highlighting a significant focus on specialized functionality.
Microsoft Intune Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix impresses with asset management across diverse operating systems, excelling in endpoint tools. In comparison, Microsoft Intune integrates seamlessly within Microsoft's ecosystem, ideal for environments favoring easy configuration and application management. BigFix supports diverse OSs, while Intune offers autopilot and zero-touch deployment benefits.
Download BigFix vs. Microsoft Intune Report
BigFix has a lower initial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Intune offers flexible pricing structures, highlighting a significant difference in the pricing model between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a lower initial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Intune offers flexible pricing structures, highlighting a significant difference in the pricing model between the two solutions.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
4.1 out of 5
ManageEngine Endpoint Central offers comprehensive asset management and automation features suitable for diverse platforms. In comparison, Microsoft Intune excels in security and integration within Microsoft ecosystems, appealing to businesses deeply embedded in Microsoft environments seeking streamlined management.
Download ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. Microsoft Intune Report
ManageEngine Endpoint Central offers lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Intune, which presents a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Endpoint Central offers lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Intune, which presents a higher initial investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
VMware Aria Automation
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Intune integrates seamlessly within Microsoft environments, offering cost-effective solutions for businesses using Azure and Office 365. In comparison, VMware Aria Automation excels in automation and multi-cloud management, catering to enterprises with complex infrastructure needs despite its higher cost.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. VMware Aria Automation Report
Microsoft Intune's setup cost is generally lower than VMware Aria Automation, providing a cost-effective initial investment, while VMware Aria Automation may require a larger upfront expenditure for its more advanced automation capabilities and features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune's setup cost is generally lower than VMware Aria Automation, providing a cost-effective initial investment, while VMware Aria Automation may require a larger upfront expenditure for its more advanced automation capabilities and features.
Microsoft Intune Logo
TeamViewer
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
TeamViewer
4.3 out of 5
TeamViewer offers robust remote control with cross-platform functionality, ideal for diverse OS management. In comparison, Microsoft Intune centralizes device management, excelling in Microsoft integration and security features. Tech buyers may prefer TeamViewer for remote accessibility and Intune for its comprehensive device policy management.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. TeamViewer Report
TeamViewer setup costs are minimal compared to Microsoft Intune, which includes higher setup fees due to its comprehensive management features.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamViewer setup costs are minimal compared to Microsoft Intune, which includes higher setup fees due to its comprehensive management features.
Microsoft Intune Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in enterprise environments with seamless Microsoft integration, beneficial for existing Microsoft users. In comparison, NinjaOne offers an intuitive interface tailored for smaller organizations, ensuring straightforward management. Intune's broader scope suits complex needs, while NinjaOne simplifies tasks for uncomplicated setups.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. NinjaOne Report
Microsoft Intune offers a competitive setup process, while NinjaOne provides more transparent pricing for new users.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a competitive setup process, while NinjaOne provides more transparent pricing for new users.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Google Cloud Identity
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Intune integrates well with Microsoft 365, offering advanced management for device platforms. In comparison, Google Cloud Identity excels in simplicity and strong identity features but lacks Intune's advanced device management, making it ideal for those prioritizing ease of use over comprehensive control.
Download Google Cloud Identity vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune has a straightforward setup cost, while Google Cloud Identity offers a more flexible, tiered structure. This difference highlights Microsoft's simplicity in initial costs versus Google Cloud's adaptable pricing strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a straightforward setup cost, while Google Cloud Identity offers a more flexible, tiered structure. This difference highlights Microsoft's simplicity in initial costs versus Google Cloud's adaptable pricing strategy.
Microsoft Intune Logo
IBM MaaS360
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
IBM MaaS360
3.9 out of 5
IBM MaaS360 offers remote device management with BYOD support and third-party integration. In comparison, Microsoft Intune features seamless Office 365 integration and Windows management. IBM requires Android security updates, while Intune needs improved macOS and Linux support. IBM's moderate pricing contrasts Intune's Microsoft 365 bundled cost-effectiveness.
Download IBM MaaS360 vs. Microsoft Intune Report
IBM MaaS360 offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, whereas Microsoft Intune typically requires a higher investment for configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM MaaS360 offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, whereas Microsoft Intune typically requires a higher investment for configuration.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in integration with Microsoft services, offering robust device management. In comparison, Red Hat Satellite focuses on automation and configuration. Tech buyers may prefer Intune for Microsoft environments or Satellite for strong automation and security compliance management.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Red Hat Satellite Report
Microsoft Intune has a low setup cost, while Red Hat Satellite requires a significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a low setup cost, while Red Hat Satellite requires a significant initial investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
SOTI MobiControl
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
SOTI MobiControl
4.1 out of 5
SOTI MobiControl offers robust remote support and flexibility across diverse platforms. In comparison, Microsoft Intune integrates seamlessly with Office 365 and Azure. SOTI excels with cost negotiation, while Intune's broader Microsoft package makes it cost-effective for existing Microsoft users.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. SOTI MobiControl Report
SOTI MobiControl has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, which may make it a more appealing option for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SOTI MobiControl has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, which may make it a more appealing option for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Check Point Remote Access VPN
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, aiding tech buyers in device management through its Azure console. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN emphasizes secure connectivity, ideal for organizations prioritizing security with integration into Check Point firewall infrastructure.
Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune involves higher setup costs, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune involves higher setup costs, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a more cost-effective setup.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
AWS Systems Manager
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in managing Windows 10, with strengths in Azure integration and security. In comparison, AWS Systems Manager enhances infrastructure efficiency with its automation capabilities. Tech buyers may choose Intune for Office 365 integration, while AWS Systems Manager offers significant cost benefits for existing AWS users.
Download AWS Systems Manager vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune features a straightforward setup cost favorable for small to medium enterprises, while AWS Systems Manager provides scalable options that may result in higher initial costs depending on the complexity and scale of implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune features a straightforward setup cost favorable for small to medium enterprises, while AWS Systems Manager provides scalable options that may result in higher initial costs depending on the complexity and scale of implementation.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune enhances security with seamless device management and Azure integration, excelling in security policy enforcement. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers strong remote access and protocol support, ideal for secure authentication. Both cater to unique organizational needs in security and management.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune typically incurs lower setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which can involve higher initial investment due to its extensive configuration and deployment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune typically incurs lower setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which can involve higher initial investment due to its extensive configuration and deployment requirements.
Microsoft Intune Logo
TeamViewer Tensor
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
TeamViewer Tensor
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in integration with Microsoft services and offers comprehensive device management, making it ideal for organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem. In comparison, TeamViewer Tensor offers powerful remote support features, appealing to those needing robust access across diverse device environments.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. TeamViewer Tensor Report
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas TeamViewer Tensor may involve additional initial setup fees. Intune tends to provide more predictable pricing, while TeamViewer's setup costs might fluctuate based on specific deployment needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas TeamViewer Tensor may involve additional initial setup fees. Intune tends to provide more predictable pricing, while TeamViewer's setup costs might fluctuate based on specific deployment needs.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in managing Windows devices within the Microsoft ecosystem with Azure integration and cost advantages for users of Office 365. In comparison, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access provides robust security without a VPN, ideal for secure remote access with extensive control.
Download BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune typically incurs lower setup costs compared to BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, which requires a more significant upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune typically incurs lower setup costs compared to BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, which requires a more significant upfront investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Intune integrates smoothly with the Microsoft ecosystem, ideal for Windows-focused environments. In comparison, Quest KACE SMA excels in endpoint inventory and asset management. Intune suits hybrid cloud users, while KACE is optimal for organizations trained in complex system management.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost compared to the higher initial investment required for Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA). Quest KACE SMA provides more robust features justifying its setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost compared to the higher initial investment required for Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA). Quest KACE SMA provides more robust features justifying its setup expense.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager targets network configuration and compliance with strong security features. In comparison, Microsoft Intune focuses on mobile device management and integrates seamlessly with Azure AD. Each offers distinct value based on enterprise needs and existing infrastructure.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager Report
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager involves initial setup costs, while Microsoft Intune offers a more cost-effective setup solution, highlighting a key financial difference.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager involves initial setup costs, while Microsoft Intune offers a more cost-effective setup solution, highlighting a key financial difference.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Intune attracts tech buyers with its integration with Microsoft 365, enhancing security management and policy settings. In comparison, Automox’s cloud-native approach emphasizes patch management and automation, appealing to those prioritizing quick deployment and simplified operations without reliance on extensive ecosystems.
Download Automox vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune entails a higher initial setup cost, while Automox offers a more budget-friendly implementation. The price distinction highlights the varied financial implications of deploying these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune entails a higher initial setup cost, while Automox offers a more budget-friendly implementation. The price distinction highlights the varied financial implications of deploying these two solutions.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
BeyondTrust Remote Support
4.5 out of 5
BeyondTrust Remote Support offers robust customization and secure remote connections, ideal for enterprises seeking high availability. In comparison, Microsoft Intune integrates smoothly within the Microsoft ecosystem, appealing to those prioritizing seamless integration with Office 365 and Azure.
Download BeyondTrust Remote Support vs. Microsoft Intune Report
BeyondTrust Remote Support has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, highlighting a significant price difference in initial deployment fees between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
BeyondTrust Remote Support has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, highlighting a significant price difference in initial deployment fees between the two solutions.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune integrates deeply with Microsoft services, ideal for businesses in a Microsoft-centric ecosystem. In comparison, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager offers superior application deployment and cloud management, beneficial for educational and retail sectors seeking simple, user-friendly solutions.
Download Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune typically features a lower initial setup cost compared to Cisco Meraki Systems Manager, which may require more extensive upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune typically features a lower initial setup cost compared to Cisco Meraki Systems Manager, which may require more extensive upfront investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Sophos Mobile
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Sophos Mobile
3.8 out of 5
Sophos Mobile offers comprehensive corporate mobile management, ideal for businesses focusing on synchronized security and ISO 27001 certifications. In comparison, Microsoft Intune provides seamless integration within Microsoft environments, appealing to organizations utilizing Office 365 and Azure for cost-effective management.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Sophos Mobile Report
Sophos Mobile has a lower setup cost than Microsoft Intune, offering an economical option, while Microsoft Intune justifies its higher cost with comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Mobile has a lower setup cost than Microsoft Intune, offering an economical option, while Microsoft Intune justifies its higher cost with comprehensive features.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
HashiCorp Terraform
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in managing Windows 10 devices with integration across Microsoft services. In comparison, HashiCorp Terraform is favored for infrastructure automation, managing multi-cloud environments. Intune benefits from cost-effectiveness within Microsoft 365 bundles, whereas Terraform attracts with its open-source model.
Download HashiCorp Terraform vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward setup with a moderate initial cost, while HashiCorp Terraform provides a complex setup that might require more initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward setup with a moderate initial cost, while HashiCorp Terraform provides a complex setup that might require more initial investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Kandji
3.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Kandji
3.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune's broad compatibility across devices and comprehensive capabilities attract diverse enterprises. In comparison, Kandji offers streamlined Apple-centric solutions, enhancing efficiency in macOS and iOS environments. Intune's cost-effective pricing benefits large deployments, while Kandji justifies costs with tailored Apple optimizations.
Microsoft Intune requires no setup cost, while Kandji charges an initial fee, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment between the two management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune requires no setup cost, while Kandji charges an initial fee, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment between the two management solutions.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Samsung Knox
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Samsung Knox
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune stands out with its seamless Microsoft 365 integration and flexible cloud deployment, appealing to Microsoft-centric organizations. In comparison, Samsung Knox offers superior device-specific security and configuration for Samsung devices, making it ideal for security-focused businesses emphasizing Samsung hardware.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Samsung Knox Report
Microsoft Intune has a straightforward and affordable setup cost, while Samsung Knox offers a slightly higher initial cost but provides comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a straightforward and affordable setup cost, while Samsung Knox offers a slightly higher initial cost but provides comprehensive capabilities.
Microsoft Intune Logo
42Gears SureMDM
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
42Gears SureMDM
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune offers deep integration with Office 365 and Azure, facilitating centralized management. In comparison, 42Gears SureMDM focuses on mobile management, featuring remote control. Both provide distinct advantages: Intune for Microsoft alignment and SureMDM for mobile-centric environments.
Download 42Gears SureMDM vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune requires no setup cost, while 42Gears SureMDM has an initial setup fee. This fee difference highlights diverse approaches to onboarding expenses for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune requires no setup cost, while 42Gears SureMDM has an initial setup fee. This fee difference highlights diverse approaches to onboarding expenses for businesses.
Microsoft Intune Logo
LogMeIn Rescue
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
LogMeIn Rescue
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with its ecosystem, ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive device management. In comparison, LogMeIn Rescue focuses on immediate remote support, appealing to organizations requiring rapid troubleshooting and efficient remote access capabilities.
Download LogMeIn Rescue vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost compared to LogMeIn Rescue, highlighting its affordability. LogMeIn Rescue's higher setup cost suggests a focus on advanced features, establishing its position as a premium choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost compared to LogMeIn Rescue, highlighting its affordability. LogMeIn Rescue's higher setup cost suggests a focus on advanced features, establishing its position as a premium choice.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Ivanti Neurons for MDM
3.6 out of 5
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with Office 365 and Azure, ideal for existing Microsoft users. In comparison, Ivanti Neurons delivers versatility across operating systems and excels in security features, appealing to organizations focused on diverse device management and robust policy options.
Download Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune offers competitive setup costs with streamlined deployment, while Ivanti Neurons for MDM generally involves higher initial expenses but is noted for comprehensive configuration options.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers competitive setup costs with streamlined deployment, while Ivanti Neurons for MDM generally involves higher initial expenses but is noted for comprehensive configuration options.

Related categories

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)
Configuration Management
Remote Access