Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Intune Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Intune Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Microsoft Intune Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Intune based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tanium, Workspace ONE UEM, and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Microsoft Intune surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive mobile device management, seamless integration with Azure services, and advanced security features that provide exceptional control and protection for enterprise environments.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Intune Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium specializes in advanced threat detection and rapid response with strong security features, attracting security-focused enterprises. In comparison, Microsoft Intune offers comprehensive device management and seamless integration with Microsoft services, appealing to businesses seeking ease of deployment and cost-effective integration capabilities.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Tanium Report
Tanium's setup cost is higher compared to Microsoft Intune, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium's setup cost is higher compared to Microsoft Intune, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in integrating with Office 365 and Azure, providing seamless management and policy deployment. In comparison, Workspace ONE UEM supports robust device management across platforms like iOS and Android, making it ideal for diverse environments requiring comprehensive mobile management.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Workspace ONE UEM Report
Microsoft Intune offers competitive setup costs, whereas Workspace ONE UEM may have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers competitive setup costs, whereas Workspace ONE UEM may have higher initial expenses.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible offers agentless automation and flexibility, appealing to IT environments needing simplicity and Linux integration. In comparison, Microsoft Intune provides seamless Microsoft ecosystem integration for managing Windows and mobile devices, suitable for businesses utilizing Azure and Microsoft 365 services.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's setup cost is competitive, while Microsoft Intune is notable for its straightforward pricing model. These differences highlight Red Hat's appeal for complex automation and Intune's suitability for straightforward implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's setup cost is competitive, while Microsoft Intune is notable for its straightforward pricing model. These differences highlight Red Hat's appeal for complex automation and Intune's suitability for straightforward implementation.
Microsoft Intune Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with Microsoft products, focusing on security and scalability. In comparison, NinjaOne excels in remote support and simplicity. For comprehensive Microsoft ecosystem management, Intune is ideal, whereas NinjaOne suits firms needing intuitive IT management and robust remote capabilities.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. NinjaOne Report
Microsoft Intune has free setup, contrasting with NinjaOne, which requires a setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has free setup, contrasting with NinjaOne, which requires a setup fee.
Microsoft Intune Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix offers extensive platform management and customization, appealing to environments with diverse OS requirements. In comparison, Microsoft Intune integrates seamlessly within the Microsoft ecosystem, providing streamlined management for Windows devices, making it ideal for enterprises already leveraging Microsoft tools.
Download BigFix vs. Microsoft Intune Report
BigFix typically involves higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Intune, making Intune a more cost-effective choice for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix typically involves higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Intune, making Intune a more cost-effective choice for budget-conscious organizations.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
VMware Aria Automation
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in seamless Microsoft ecosystem integration and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, VMware Aria Automation offers robust automation for complex environments. Buyers may prefer Intune for flexible device management and ROI or VMware for advanced automation despite higher costs and complexity.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. VMware Aria Automation Report
Microsoft Intune's setup cost is minimal with straightforward initial configuration, while VMware Aria Automation incurs higher setup expenses due to its complex installation process. This cost distinction significantly impacts initial investment considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune's setup cost is minimal with straightforward initial configuration, while VMware Aria Automation incurs higher setup expenses due to its complex installation process. This cost distinction significantly impacts initial investment considerations.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Jamf Pro
4.7 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Jamf Pro
4.7 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels with deep integration into the Microsoft ecosystem, making it ideal for businesses using Microsoft solutions. In comparison, Jamf Pro offers robust management for Apple devices, appealing to organizations focused on macOS and iOS with tailored, advanced capabilities.
Download Jamf Pro vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune offers a cost-effective setup with limited initial expenses, while Jamf Pro requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a significant difference in startup costs for businesses evaluating device management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a cost-effective setup with limited initial expenses, while Jamf Pro requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a significant difference in startup costs for businesses evaluating device management solutions.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
TeamViewer Business
4.3 out of 5
TeamViewer Business excels in cross-platform access and ease of use without extensive support needs. In comparison, Microsoft Intune integrates deeply with Microsoft systems, offering a comprehensive management solution but faces challenges in deployment and support outside its ecosystem, benefiting enterprises using Microsoft products.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. TeamViewer Business Report
TeamViewer Business requires higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft Intune offers a more economical entry point for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamViewer Business requires higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft Intune offers a more economical entry point for setup.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
4.1 out of 5
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is chosen for its strong patch management and asset management features, offering cost-effective centralized endpoint solutions. In comparison, Microsoft Intune integrates seamlessly with Microsoft services, appealing to those invested in the Microsoft ecosystem for a cloud-based experience.
Download ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. Microsoft Intune Report
ManageEngine Endpoint Central has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Intune requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Endpoint Central has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Intune requires a higher initial investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Google Cloud Identity
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in comprehensive device management and security integration with Windows, Azure, Office 365, and more, making it ideal for Microsoft ecosystems. In comparison, Google Cloud Identity offers seamless app management and ease of use within the Google ecosystem, supporting user-friendly deployment.
Download Google Cloud Identity vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune has a straightforward setup cost, while Google Cloud Identity offers a more customizable setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a straightforward setup cost, while Google Cloud Identity offers a more customizable setup fee.
Microsoft Intune Logo
IBM MaaS360
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
IBM MaaS360
3.9 out of 5
IBM MaaS360 appeals with its efficient BYOD management, while Microsoft Intune excels through Microsoft 365 integration. In comparison, IBM MaaS360 faces Android enrollment challenges. However, Microsoft Intune offers competitive pricing within Microsoft bundles for seamless integration.
Download IBM MaaS360 vs. Microsoft Intune Report
IBM MaaS360 offers competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Intune provides scalable pricing options.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM MaaS360 offers competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Intune provides scalable pricing options.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Check Point Remote Access VPN
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Intune integrates deep within the Microsoft ecosystem for seamless management, appealing to organizations leveraging Microsoft 365. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN focuses on robust security, suitable for businesses prioritizing secure connections within the Check Point firewall ecosystem.
Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Remote Access VPN, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment. In contrast, Check Point offers more advanced features but with higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Remote Access VPN, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment. In contrast, Check Point offers more advanced features but with higher initial expenses.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in the Microsoft ecosystem with strong Windows integration and Azure AD support, appealing to enterprises already utilizing Microsoft products. In comparison, Red Hat Satellite is ideal for managing Red Hat environments with its robust patch management and security features suited for Linux administration.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Red Hat Satellite Report
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, whereas Red Hat Satellite presents a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust infrastructure management capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, whereas Red Hat Satellite presents a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust infrastructure management capabilities.
Microsoft Intune Logo
SOTI MobiControl
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
SOTI MobiControl
4.1 out of 5
SOTI MobiControl offers vital Android management and secure content features, appealing to IT support teams. In comparison, Microsoft Intune integrates with Office 365, optimizing device management and policy control for Windows and iOS. Pricing strategies differ, with Intune providing flexible options through Microsoft 365 integration.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. SOTI MobiControl Report
SOTI MobiControl has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Intune offers a lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SOTI MobiControl has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Intune offers a lower initial investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in endpoint management and security, with cost-effectiveness for Microsoft users. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager offers robust secure access and authentication protocols. While Intune benefits Microsoft environments, F5 BIG-IP APM is ideal for those prioritizing premium security features.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune has competitive setup costs appealing to businesses of all sizes, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) involves higher initial expenses but offers robust security features catering to enterprises with complex access management needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has competitive setup costs appealing to businesses of all sizes, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) involves higher initial expenses but offers robust security features catering to enterprises with complex access management needs.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
AWS Systems Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune offers integration with Office 365 and Azure Active Directory, ideal for Microsoft-centric environments. In comparison, AWS Systems Manager excels in automation and suits complex AWS setups. Each solution appeals based on ecosystem compatibility and infrastructure needs.
Download AWS Systems Manager vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune has a higher setup cost but offers comprehensive device management features, while AWS Systems Manager provides a more cost-effective setup, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a higher setup cost but offers comprehensive device management features, while AWS Systems Manager provides a more cost-effective setup, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
Microsoft Intune Logo
TeamViewer Tensor
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
TeamViewer Tensor
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in device management and Microsoft integration. In comparison, TeamViewer Tensor provides superior remote support and real-time access. Intune is apt for organizations using Microsoft, while Tensor suits those prioritizing advanced remote capabilities and cross-platform support.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. TeamViewer Tensor Report
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward setup process that is included in its subscription, while TeamViewer Tensor requires a separate installation fee, highlighting a notable difference in initial cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward setup process that is included in its subscription, while TeamViewer Tensor requires a separate installation fee, highlighting a notable difference in initial cost structure.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in cloud administration and integration within its ecosystem. In comparison, KACE SMA is preferred for comprehensive IT asset management in diverse environments, offering flexible licensing. Intune suits Microsoft-centric settings, while KACE meets diverse platform needs.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune generally has lower setup costs, offering a straightforward onboarding process, whereas KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a more complex setup with potentially higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune generally has lower setup costs, offering a straightforward onboarding process, whereas KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a more complex setup with potentially higher initial costs.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune targets seamless device management, especially for Microsoft ecosystem users. In comparison, BeyondTrust excels in security-focused remote access control. Tech buyers might choose Intune for integrated compliance and administration, while those prioritizing security may prefer BeyondTrust's robust access management features.
Download BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune's setup cost is more flexible, while BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access involves higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune's setup cost is more flexible, while BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access involves higher initial investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
BeyondTrust Remote Support
4.5 out of 5
BeyondTrust Remote Support focuses on secure remote access and customized support, appealing to those prioritizing security and flexibility. In comparison, Microsoft Intune offers strong integration within Microsoft ecosystems, ideal for organizations seeking comprehensive device management and seamless integration with Office 365 and Azure.
Download BeyondTrust Remote Support vs. Microsoft Intune Report
BeyondTrust Remote Support has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
BeyondTrust Remote Support has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment for deployment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune offers deep integration with Windows environments, ideal for enterprises using Microsoft technology. In comparison, Automox excels in cross-platform flexibility and simplicity, appealing to organizations with diverse operating systems seeking cost-effective, efficient management solutions. Both cater to distinct organizational priorities.
Download Automox vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune typically involves a more complex setup costing time and resources, while Automox offers simpler and more affordable setup options catering to immediate deployment needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune typically involves a more complex setup costing time and resources, while Automox offers simpler and more affordable setup options catering to immediate deployment needs.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Samsung Knox
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Samsung Knox
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, ideal for managing Windows devices and enhancing ROI in enterprise environments. In comparison, Samsung Knox excels in securing Samsung devices, offering a competitive pricing structure for businesses focused on Samsung's ecosystem.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Samsung Knox Report
Microsoft Intune has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Samsung Knox often requires a more complex setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Samsung Knox often requires a more complex setup process.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager offers robust network features like real-time monitoring and automated backups, ideal for network-centric environments. In comparison, Microsoft Intune excels in endpoint management and seamless integration with Microsoft services, making it suitable for comprehensive device and application management across platforms.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager Report
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager involves a more substantial setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, providing insight into its robust network management capabilities versus Intune's streamlined, cost-effective endpoint management solution.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager involves a more substantial setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, providing insight into its robust network management capabilities versus Intune's streamlined, cost-effective endpoint management solution.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Kandji
3.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Kandji
3.5 out of 5
Microsoft Intune emphasizes enterprise-grade security and broad device compatibility, making it ideal for Microsoft 365 integrated businesses. In comparison, Kandji targets Apple environments with automation and ease of use, appealing to organizations seeking specialized Apple device management solutions.
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost compared to Kandji, which can be a more expensive option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost compared to Kandji, which can be a more expensive option for initial deployment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
ScreenConnect
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
ScreenConnect
4.2 out of 5
ScreenConnect provides robust remote access with affordability and reliable connectivity. In comparison, Microsoft Intune excels in device management and security features, offering integration with Office 365, though it is costlier and more complex. Both have strong customer support and deployment options.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. ScreenConnect Report
ScreenConnect offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, making it more budget-friendly for small businesses. Microsoft Intune, however, provides a comprehensive setup ideal for larger enterprises seeking extensive security management features.
View comparison
Pricing
ScreenConnect offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, making it more budget-friendly for small businesses. Microsoft Intune, however, provides a comprehensive setup ideal for larger enterprises seeking extensive security management features.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune's seamless integration with Office 365 and Azure enhances security and productivity through comprehensive policy deployment. In comparison, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager emphasizes ease of use, scalability, and enterprise-grade features like remote wiping, benefiting organizations with diverse device needs.
Download Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost with a straightforward implementation process, whereas Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) has a higher initial expense but provides robust configuration options tailored for more complex environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a lower setup cost with a straightforward implementation process, whereas Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) has a higher initial expense but provides robust configuration options tailored for more complex environments.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Intune Logo
HashiCorp Terraform
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Intune offers robust endpoint management, excelling in integration with the Microsoft ecosystem for streamlined deployment and security. In comparison, HashiCorp Terraform provides significant advantages in infrastructure automation, appealing to those seeking Infrastructure as Code capabilities across diverse cloud providers.
Download HashiCorp Terraform vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune has a relatively lower setup cost, while HashiCorp Terraform's setup involves more expenses. The cost difference may influence decisions based on budget constraints for setup implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a relatively lower setup cost, while HashiCorp Terraform's setup involves more expenses. The cost difference may influence decisions based on budget constraints for setup implementation.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Sophos Mobile
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Sophos Mobile
3.8 out of 5
Sophos Mobile excels in integration with firewalls and endpoints, appealing to those seeking a comprehensive security ecosystem. In comparison, Microsoft Intune's strength lies in seamless Microsoft product integration, making it ideal for organizations leveraging Microsoft's range of enterprise solutions.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Sophos Mobile Report
Sophos Mobile typically offers a lower initial setup cost, while Microsoft Intune may require a larger upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Mobile typically offers a lower initial setup cost, while Microsoft Intune may require a larger upfront investment.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Chef
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Chef
4.0 out of 5
Chef excels in configuration management, appealing to DevOps environments with its automation capabilities. In comparison, Microsoft Intune offers extensive mobile device management and integration with Microsoft 365, making it ideal for organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem seeking comprehensive IT management solutions.
Download Chef vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Chef has a low initial setup cost, making it an affordable choice, while Microsoft Intune has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Chef has a low initial setup cost, making it an affordable choice, while Microsoft Intune has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive features.
Microsoft Intune Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Intune provides comprehensive management and integration with other Microsoft services, ideal for businesses invested in its ecosystem. In comparison, Scalefusion excels in ease of use and quick deployment, appealing to companies seeking affordability and flexibility across multiple platforms.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Scalefusion Report
Microsoft Intune has a complex setup cost structure, while Scalefusion offers a more straightforward and budget-friendly setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a complex setup cost structure, while Scalefusion offers a more straightforward and budget-friendly setup cost.
Microsoft Intune Logo
42Gears SureMDM
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune Logo
42Gears SureMDM
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in integration with Azure and Office 365, providing seamless device management across various platforms. In comparison, 42Gears SureMDM focuses on mobile device control with strong security features, appealing to users needing specialized mobile management solutions.
Download 42Gears SureMDM vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune offers low setup costs, attracting businesses focused on budget, while 42Gears SureMDM requires higher initial investment, appealing to users valuing advanced features and customization.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers low setup costs, attracting businesses focused on budget, while 42Gears SureMDM requires higher initial investment, appealing to users valuing advanced features and customization.

Related categories

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)
Configuration Management
Remote Access