Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kiuwan Logo

Top 10 Kiuwan Alternatives

Vendor: Kiuwan
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Kiuwan Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kiuwan based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), GitLab, and Snyk. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Kiuwan Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kiuwan, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
4.0 out of 5
SonarQube Server offers extensive language support and rich data representation. In comparison, Kiuwan excels with rapid scanning and detailed vulnerability analyses. SonarQube focuses on community integration, whereas Kiuwan prioritizes efficiency and cost-effective operations with flexible deployment options.
Download Kiuwan vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report
SonarQube Server includes a straightforward setup process, while Kiuwan may involve higher setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Server includes a straightforward setup process, while Kiuwan may involve higher setup costs.
Kiuwan Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan offers attractive pricing and easy deployment with robust code analysis and security features. In comparison, GitLab's higher cost delivers richer capabilities, including CI/CD integration and full DevOps lifecycle management, appealing to teams seeking comprehensive functionality despite more complex deployment.
Download GitLab vs. Kiuwan Report
Kiuwan requires a substantial setup cost investment, while GitLab offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a clear cost advantage.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan requires a substantial setup cost investment, while GitLab offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a clear cost advantage.
Kiuwan Logo
Snyk
4.0 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Snyk
4.0 out of 5
Kiuwan integrates with Jenkins and JIRA and addresses code defects with action plans, offering affordability through code-based pricing. In comparison, Snyk is valued for easy integration and vulnerability management with scalable licensing, supporting extensive features that justify its higher cost.
Download Kiuwan vs. Snyk Report
Kiuwan offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Snyk requires a higher initial investment but includes more comprehensive integration support.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Snyk requires a higher initial investment but includes more comprehensive integration support.
Kiuwan Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Checkmarx One offers extensive integrations and multi-language support. In comparison, Kiuwan excels in vulnerability insights and intuitive configuration, appealing to detailed security needs. Checkmarx One attracts with competitive pricing, while Kiuwan provides value through comprehensive insights despite higher costs.
Download Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Report
Checkmarx One has a high upfront setup cost, while Kiuwan offers a more affordable initial setup. This pricing difference may influence budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One has a high upfront setup cost, while Kiuwan offers a more affordable initial setup. This pricing difference may influence budget-conscious users.
Kiuwan Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
Veracode, known for robust analytics integration, appeals to those seeking seamless workflow integration. In comparison, Kiuwan attracts users desiring extensive rule customization. Veracode's intuitive deployment aids quick setup, while Kiuwan's cost-effectiveness offers detailed security insights, appealing to budget-conscious tech buyers.
Download Kiuwan vs. Veracode Report
Veracode's setup cost is typically higher yet offers robust enterprise-level features, while Kiuwan presents a more budget-friendly option with costs that align well with small to medium-sized businesses, emphasizing flexibility and ease of initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Veracode's setup cost is typically higher yet offers robust enterprise-level features, while Kiuwan presents a more budget-friendly option with costs that align well with small to medium-sized businesses, emphasizing flexibility and ease of initial implementation.
Kiuwan Logo
Coverity Static
3.9 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Coverity Static
3.9 out of 5
Kiuwan offers lower costs and quick scanning times, making it ideal for fast-paced environments. In comparison, Coverity's robust features and extensive language support cater to larger teams despite higher pricing. Integration flexibility makes both solutions appealing for diverse tech needs.
Download Coverity Static vs. Kiuwan Report
Kiuwan requires a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with Coverity Static, which may involve additional expenses. When evaluating these solutions, each presents unique considerations in their pricing setup, impacting the overall implementation budget.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan requires a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with Coverity Static, which may involve additional expenses. When evaluating these solutions, each presents unique considerations in their pricing setup, impacting the overall implementation budget.
Kiuwan Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
Kiuwan excels in pricing and customer support, appealing for its thorough code analysis and seamless integration efforts. In comparison, Mend.io's enhanced vulnerability detection and extensive tech support cater to those valuing a versatile solution, justifying its higher cost through robust features and solid ROI.
Download Kiuwan vs. Mend.io Report
Kiuwan has a more cost-effective setup cost compared to Mend.io, providing an attractive initial investment. On the other hand, Mend.io offers a higher setup cost, potentially indicating a more comprehensive upfront service or feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan has a more cost-effective setup cost compared to Mend.io, providing an attractive initial investment. On the other hand, Mend.io offers a higher setup cost, potentially indicating a more comprehensive upfront service or feature set.
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
OpenText Core Application Security
4.0 out of 5
OpenText Core Application Security offers comprehensive scanning and integration in CI/CD pipelines. In comparison, Kiuwan's modular approach and rapid scanning speed contribute to faster feedback cycles. OpenText excels in centralized management, while Kiuwan's real-time analytics aid agile development processes.
Download Kiuwan vs. OpenText Core Application Security Report
OpenText Core Application Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Kiuwan provides a more budget-friendly option. The differences highlight Kiuwan's affordability in comparison to OpenText Core's potentially higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Core Application Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Kiuwan provides a more budget-friendly option. The differences highlight Kiuwan's affordability in comparison to OpenText Core's potentially higher initial investment.
Kiuwan Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
OWASP Zap appeals for its cost-effectiveness, plugin support, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Kiuwan attracts through its comprehensive features, offering in-depth analytics and continuous monitoring, although its complex setup is offset by responsive support. Buyer choice hinges on budget and feature priorities.
Download Kiuwan vs. OWASP Zap Report
OWASP Zap offers a low-cost setup appealing to budget-conscious users, while Kiuwan presents a more premium setup cost reflecting its comprehensive solution.
View comparison
Pricing
OWASP Zap offers a low-cost setup appealing to budget-conscious users, while Kiuwan presents a more premium setup cost reflecting its comprehensive solution.
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)
4.1 out of 5
Kiuwan offers integration ease with Jenkins and JIRA, appealing for legacy systems with its security and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud focuses on continuous analysis and integration capabilities, benefiting mid-sized companies with its cloud-based setup and strong customer support.
Download Kiuwan vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
Kiuwan incurs a significant setup cost while SonarQube Cloud provides a more affordable onboarding option, highlighting a clear distinction in initial investment requirements for users considering these code analysis solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan incurs a significant setup cost while SonarQube Cloud provides a more affordable onboarding option, highlighting a clear distinction in initial investment requirements for users considering these code analysis solutions.
Kiuwan Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
HCL AppScan excels in comprehensive vulnerability detection with flexible deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Kiuwan offers efficient integration and affordability, making it ideal for diverse programming environments. HCL may suit organizations prioritizing support, while Kiuwan appeals with cost-effective integration capabilities.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan Report
HCL AppScan offers competitive setup costs suitable for large enterprises, while Kiuwan provides a more cost-effective setup ideal for smaller teams. Differing approaches to affordability highlight distinct target audiences and utilization scales.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan offers competitive setup costs suitable for large enterprises, while Kiuwan provides a more cost-effective setup ideal for smaller teams. Differing approaches to affordability highlight distinct target audiences and utilization scales.
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning
3.8 out of 5
Qualys Web Application Scanning is noted for its efficient deployment, favorable pricing, and strong support, making it ideal for vulnerability management and seamless integration needs. In comparison, Kiuwan appeals with a comprehensive feature set for those prioritizing extensive code analysis and security compliance.
Download Kiuwan vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning Report
Qualys Web Application Scanning incurs a setup cost that can be higher, focusing on comprehensive security features, while Kiuwan presents a comparatively lower setup expense, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with moderate initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys Web Application Scanning incurs a setup cost that can be higher, focusing on comprehensive security features, while Kiuwan presents a comparatively lower setup expense, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with moderate initial investment.
Kiuwan Logo
Klocwork
4.0 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Klocwork
4.0 out of 5
Klocwork offers reliable support and clear pricing for efficient code analysis. In comparison, Kiuwan provides a comprehensive feature set with robust integration capabilities. Tech buyers may choose Klocwork for ease of deployment or opt for Kiuwan's broader functionality despite its complexity.
Download Kiuwan vs. Klocwork Report
Klocwork's setup cost is generally higher due to its comprehensive features, while Kiuwan offers a more budget-friendly option with a lower initial setup cost, highlighting its potential appeal for organizations with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Klocwork's setup cost is generally higher due to its comprehensive features, while Kiuwan offers a more budget-friendly option with a lower initial setup cost, highlighting its potential appeal for organizations with limited budgets.
Kiuwan Logo
GitHub
4.4 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
GitHub
4.4 out of 5
GitHub excels in code management and collaboration with features like Git Hooks and GitHub Actions. In comparison, Kiuwan performs fast security scans and detailed risk assessments. Tech buyers might choose GitHub for collaboration and Kiuwan for comprehensive security analysis.
Download GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report
GitHub offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Kiuwan requires additional investment for implementation. This contrast highlights a significant cost difference in the initial setup phase between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
GitHub offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Kiuwan requires additional investment for implementation. This contrast highlights a significant cost difference in the initial setup phase between the two solutions.
Kiuwan Logo
Invicti
4.1 out of 5
Kiuwan Logo
Invicti
4.1 out of 5
Invicti attracts budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and efficient customer support. In comparison, Kiuwan offers advanced integration capabilities and extensive scanning features, appealing to those prioritizing long-term value through comprehensive security tools despite higher initial costs.
Download Invicti vs. Kiuwan Report
Invicti has a competitive setup cost, while Kiuwan requires a higher initial investment. This pricing distinction highlights Invicti as a more budget-friendly option compared to Kiuwan.
View comparison
Pricing
Invicti has a competitive setup cost, while Kiuwan requires a higher initial investment. This pricing distinction highlights Invicti as a more budget-friendly option compared to Kiuwan.
Kiuwan Logo
Kiuwan Logo
Contrast Security Assess
4.4 out of 5
Kiuwan appeals with competitive pricing and robust support, catering to diverse environments. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess delivers advanced real-time monitoring and dynamic assessments. Kiuwan's efficiency suits budget-conscious teams, while Contrast's richer features justify higher costs for those seeking comprehensive security insights.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Kiuwan Report
Kiuwan offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which tends to be higher. This difference may influence businesses depending on budget considerations when evaluating software security tools.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which tends to be higher. This difference may influence businesses depending on budget considerations when evaluating software security tools.

Related categories

Application Security Tools
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Development Analytics