HCL AppScan vs Kiuwan comparison

HCLSoftware and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HCLSoftware is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.5, while Kiuwan is ranked #29. HCLSoftware holds a 2.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

HCL AppScan

Read 44 HCL AppScan reviews

6,863 Views
4,667 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

3,250 Views
2,633 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

HCL AppScan and Kiuwan compete in the security and code quality enhancement category. HCL AppScan seems to have the upper hand in scalability and stability, while Kiuwan offers a more cost-effective solution with a strong continuous integration process.

Features: HCL AppScan provides effective scanning during code construction with excellent scalability and stability, specializing in detecting reflected XSS vulnerabilities. Kiuwan offers impressive speed and modularity, enhancing both vulnerability scanning and code quality. It has a strong continuous integration process that ensures seamless security in software development.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could improve its false positives rate, enhance usability, and expand service integration and language support. Users note a need for a better UI and database expansion. Kiuwan faces challenges with limited language support and issues like report downloading difficulties; improving dependency scanning and defining clearer rules are suggested enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan offers high adaptability across various deployment environments with mixed reviews on technical support, especially after its transition from IBM. Kiuwan provides diverse deployment options including hybrid cloud environments, receiving slightly better feedback on support quality. Both are available in public cloud and on-premises formats.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is considered expensive with a challenging pricing model, but effective in reducing vulnerabilities, providing significant ROI over time. Kiuwan's more affordable subscription model based on code lines appeals to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness. Despite its higher cost, AppScan users highlight its better ROI through improved security efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,204 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

21st

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (6th)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

29th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.3%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HCL AppScan	2.3%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	96.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Has improved identification of encryption and authentication issues across cloud and on-prem applications

During the learning curve of onboarding HCL AppScan, we learned that HCL has altered the portfolio and now offers HCL AppScan 360, which has a much better look and feel with an improved user interface. However, there is one feature called SCA, which stands for Software Composition Analysis, that could be improved. When I'm doing an application scan, HCL AppScan has the ability to generate information about what components are in use. For example, if I'm scanning a web application, it shows me the various components being used. It tells me whether I have Java libraries, .NET frameworks, or other log management libraries such as Log4j, and what versions of those specific components are present. I would like to see more detailed reports from the tool. Currently, you can find out the components belonging to a specific software, but if detailed reporting became available, you would be in a better position to identify vulnerabilities. For instance, I could identify that I had the Log4j vulnerability and know that I need to fix my application accordingly. If they add the features I'm describing, I would consider giving them a higher rating. However, I've only been experienced with the product for three months.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has certainly improved our organization in terms of quality of solutions that are developed."

"SAST is the only feature that works using the on-prem version."

"This is a stable solution."

"AppScan is stable."

"The solution is easy to use."

"For me, as a manager, it was the ease of use. Inserting security into the development process is not normally an easy project to do. The ability for the developer to actually use it and get results and focuses, that's what counted."

"It is an application for security assessment or scanning for static environments, and with all customers, it is performing well."

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase."

More HCL AppScan pros

"Kiuwan has enabled us to give our customers peace of mind through early identification of code vulnerabilities and remediation before delivery to the customer."

"We have been using this solution for one and a half years."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"Customer service is excellent."

"Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices."

"This solution helps us to catch issues early on, and find problems that we never knew we had."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The solution often has a high number of false positives. It's an aspect they really need to improve upon."

"The dashboard, for AppScan or the Fortified fast tool, which we use needs to be improved."

"There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost. "

"It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good."

"They should have a better UI for dashboards."

"Visibility is an issue for us. Our partners were not even aware that we had an integration with AppSense."

"Many silly false positives are produced."

"It has crashed at times."

More HCL AppScan cons

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"More languages and frameworks would enhance this tool."

"We faced a lot of problems with the initial setup and support gave us difficulties around the installation."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

"The tool was expensive."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Check with your account manager."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

University

11%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

I'm currently working with BigFix and HCL AppScan. At least three people in my company are using HCL AppScan. Since we are a reseller, we run it in both lab environments and live production applica...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HCL AppScan?

AppScan is considered more cost-effective than Veracode, although I have not updated the exact pricing details. Companies often choose based on budget constraints, with Veracode being on the higher...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs HCL AppScan

Compared 6% of the time

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 6% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 19% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 13% of the time

GitHub vs Kiuwan

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

Digital.ai Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 3% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

May 2026

Download HCL AppScan product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

May 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

No data available

Overview

HCL AppScan offers quick vulnerability detection with effective SDLC integration and is known for its user-friendly interface and seamless security integration.

HCL AppScan provides dynamic and static scanning to identify vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection. It integrates well into CI/CD pipelines, supports multiple languages, and offers web and dynamic scanning, helping businesses ensure security across development lifecycles. Users benefit from API coverage, Postman integration, and its ability to function in cloud and on-premise environments, facilitating a shift from DevOps to DevSecOps practices.

What features define HCL AppScan?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and usage.
Vulnerability detection: Quickly identifies issues like XSS and SQL injection.
Integration with SDLC: Seamlessly blends with development processes.
Dynamic scanning: Offers comprehensive security evaluations.
Multiple language support: Supports diverse programming environments.

What benefits should users consider?

Scalability: Adapts to growing needs and projects.
Low false-positive rates: Delivers accurate and reliable results.
Detailed reporting: Provides comprehensive vulnerability insights.
Effective integration: Enhances CI/CD pipeline security.

HCL AppScan is leveraged in sectors requiring rigorous security checks, such as finance and healthcare, where it conducts comprehensive scans and offers insights into potential vulnerabilities. Its robust scanning capabilities aid companies in maintaining compliance and security standards.

HCLSoftware

Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.

Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and security integration for continuous deployment. Developers can perform efficient local or cloud-based scans, benefiting from action plans for better code correction. Integration with tools like Jenkins facilitates quick processing and detailed risk assessments, while challenges remain in language support expansion and smoother integration with Azure DevOps and popular IDEs. Enhanced frameworks and mobile development testing would amplify its utility, with users seeking improved navigation, report downloading, and technical support.

What are the most important features of Kiuwan?

Fast Scanning: Provides quick scans for immediate insights.
Reporting: Robust features for generating detailed reports.
Intuitive UI: Easy-to-navigate interface.
Technology Coverage: Supports a range of languages from COBOL to JS.
Tool Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins for CI/CD processes.
Modularity: Allows specific models for targeted analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Kiuwan reviews?

Enhanced Code Security: Identifies vulnerabilities swiftly and efficiently.
Continuous Integration: Facilitates ongoing security assessments.
Improved Code Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to coding standards.
Actionable Insights: Provides risk assessments with actionable recommendations.

In industries focused on software development, Kiuwan is integral for security and vulnerability assessments. It's embedded into workflows to analyze, detect and correct vulnerabilities, addressing threats like SQL injection and adhering to OWASP Top 10. The tool supports secure coding practices and performance evaluation, aiding organizations in maintaining rigorous security standards.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan

June 2026

Free Report: HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.