HCL AppScan vs Kiuwan comparison

Why PeerSpot?

HCLSoftware and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HCLSoftware is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0, while Kiuwan is ranked #34. HCLSoftware holds a 2.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

HCL AppScan

Read 44 HCL AppScan reviews

9,023 Views
5,865 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

4,202 Views
3,320 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

HCL AppScan and Kiuwan compete in the security and code quality enhancement category. HCL AppScan seems to have the upper hand in scalability and stability, while Kiuwan offers a more cost-effective solution with a strong continuous integration process.

Features: HCL AppScan provides effective scanning during code construction with excellent scalability and stability, specializing in detecting reflected XSS vulnerabilities. Kiuwan offers impressive speed and modularity, enhancing both vulnerability scanning and code quality. It has a strong continuous integration process that ensures seamless security in software development.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could improve its false positives rate, enhance usability, and expand service integration and language support. Users note a need for a better UI and database expansion. Kiuwan faces challenges with limited language support and issues like report downloading difficulties; improving dependency scanning and defining clearer rules are suggested enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan offers high adaptability across various deployment environments with mixed reviews on technical support, especially after its transition from IBM. Kiuwan provides diverse deployment options including hybrid cloud environments, receiving slightly better feedback on support quality. Both are available in public cloud and on-premises formats.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is considered expensive with a challenging pricing model, but effective in reducing vulnerabilities, providing significant ROI over time. Kiuwan's more affordable subscription model based on code lines appeals to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness. Despite its higher cost, AppScan users highlight its better ROI through improved security efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,088 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

22nd

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (7th)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

34th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HCL AppScan	2.3%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	96.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Has improved identification of encryption and authentication issues across cloud and on-prem applications

During the learning curve of onboarding HCL AppScan, we learned that HCL has altered the portfolio and now offers HCL AppScan 360, which has a much better look and feel with an improved user interface. However, there is one feature called SCA, which stands for Software Composition Analysis, that could be improved. When I'm doing an application scan, HCL AppScan has the ability to generate information about what components are in use. For example, if I'm scanning a web application, it shows me the various components being used. It tells me whether I have Java libraries, .NET frameworks, or other log management libraries such as Log4j, and what versions of those specific components are present. I would like to see more detailed reports from the tool. Currently, you can find out the components belonging to a specific software, but if detailed reporting became available, you would be in a better position to identify vulnerabilities. For instance, I could identify that I had the Log4j vulnerability and know that I need to fix my application accordingly. If they add the features I'm describing, I would consider giving them a higher rating. However, I've only been experienced with the product for three months.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers services in a few specific development languages."

"The security and the dashboard are the most valuable features."

"HCL AppScan has helped us improve our security posture, as we've been able to identify quite a few issues."

"For its first initial release, the integration was pretty good."

"The most valuable feature is that it achieves a very low false-positive detection rate."

"Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production."

"I mainly use AppScan for vulnerability scanning and database bridging."

"We use it as a security testing application."

More HCL AppScan pros

"Saving time and money by automatically identifying problems is unbelievable."

"I advise using Kiuwan because it's very straightforward and totally easy to understand."

"For the moment, this is a solution that I could recommend."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"We have had an improvement of 20% in our time to market and it significantly improved the quality of our code."

"We switched because Kiuwan covers the entire SDLC; provides direct information to act upon, for the developer, architects, QA, CIO and CISO, in a few seconds; automatically, fully integrated in any CI/CD setup."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"HCL AppScan needs to improve security."

"Unfortunately, there is a big discussion if it is very expensive to use it or not, and there are competitors."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated."

"We would like to integrate with some of the other reporting tools that we're planning to use in the future."

"One thing which I think can be improved is the CI/CD Integration"

"The depth was low, but the part that the user could miss was also diagnosed."

"Scans become slow on large websites."

More HCL AppScan cons

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"Improvement could be made with the integration of the programming tools."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"For mobile development, we are not too experienced, and it is not the perfect tool because the integration with certain products is very manual."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."

"The tool was expensive."

"The solution is cheap."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Check with your account manager."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

I'm currently working with BigFix and HCL AppScan. At least three people in my company are using HCL AppScan. Since we are a reseller, we run it in both lab environments and live production applica...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HCL AppScan?

AppScan is considered more cost-effective than Veracode, although I have not updated the exact pricing details. Companies often choose based on budget constraints, with Veracode being on the higher...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs HCL AppScan

Compared 5% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs HCL AppScan

Compared 5% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 15% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 4% of the time

Digital.ai Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 3% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

October 2026

Download HCL AppScan product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

October 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

No data available

Overview

HCL AppScan offers quick vulnerability detection with effective SDLC integration and is known for its user-friendly interface and seamless security integration.

HCL AppScan provides dynamic and static scanning to identify vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection. It integrates well into CI/CD pipelines, supports multiple languages, and offers web and dynamic scanning, helping businesses ensure security across development lifecycles. Users benefit from API coverage, Postman integration, and its ability to function in cloud and on-premise environments, facilitating a shift from DevOps to DevSecOps practices.

What features define HCL AppScan?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and usage.
Vulnerability detection: Quickly identifies issues like XSS and SQL injection.
Integration with SDLC: Seamlessly blends with development processes.
Dynamic scanning: Offers comprehensive security evaluations.
Multiple language support: Supports diverse programming environments.

What benefits should users consider?

Scalability: Adapts to growing needs and projects.
Low false-positive rates: Delivers accurate and reliable results.
Detailed reporting: Provides comprehensive vulnerability insights.
Effective integration: Enhances CI/CD pipeline security.

HCL AppScan is leveraged in sectors requiring rigorous security checks, such as finance and healthcare, where it conducts comprehensive scans and offers insights into potential vulnerabilities. Its robust scanning capabilities aid companies in maintaining compliance and security standards.

HCLSoftware

Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.

Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and security integration for continuous deployment. Developers can perform efficient local or cloud-based scans, benefiting from action plans for better code correction. Integration with tools like Jenkins facilitates quick processing and detailed risk assessments, while challenges remain in language support expansion and smoother integration with Azure DevOps and popular IDEs. Enhanced frameworks and mobile development testing would amplify its utility, with users seeking improved navigation, report downloading, and technical support.

What are the most important features of Kiuwan?

Fast Scanning: Provides quick scans for immediate insights.
Reporting: Robust features for generating detailed reports.
Intuitive UI: Easy-to-navigate interface.
Technology Coverage: Supports a range of languages from COBOL to JS.
Tool Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins for CI/CD processes.
Modularity: Allows specific models for targeted analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Kiuwan reviews?

Enhanced Code Security: Identifies vulnerabilities swiftly and efficiently.
Continuous Integration: Facilitates ongoing security assessments.
Improved Code Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to coding standards.
Actionable Insights: Provides risk assessments with actionable recommendations.

In industries focused on software development, Kiuwan is integral for security and vulnerability assessments. It's embedded into workflows to analyze, detect and correct vulnerabilities, addressing threats like SQL injection and adhering to OWASP Top 10. The tool supports secure coding practices and performance evaluation, aiding organizations in maintaining rigorous security standards.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan

September 2026

Free Report: HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.