Kiuwan vs OWASP Zap comparison

Kiuwan and OWASP are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Kiuwan is ranked #26, while OWASP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. Kiuwan holds a 1.1% mindshare in SAST, compared to OWASP’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Kiuwan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of OWASP users who would recommend it.

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

2,214 Views
1,683 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OWASP Zap

Read 41 OWASP Zap reviews

7,440 Views
6,845 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

OWASP Zap

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

OWASP Zap and Kiuwan are key players in the application security testing arena. User feedback points to OWASP Zap as more favored for its pricing and support, while Kiuwan gains recognition for its comprehensive feature set, making it appealing despite its higher cost.

Features: OWASP Zap is known for effectively identifying security vulnerabilities, efficient scanning, and immediate vulnerability testing. Kiuwan is praised for its broad feature set, including advanced code analysis and integration capabilities, making it versatile for different use cases.

Room for Improvement: OWASP Zap users request improvements in performance speed and reporting tools. Kiuwan users seek more streamlined integrations and better documentation. Both sets of users desire enhanced usability features, with Kiuwan users seeking easier navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OWASP Zap is noted for straightforward deployment, though some users wish for more responsive customer service. Kiuwan provides detailed implementation support, but deployment can be challenging for some organizations.

Pricing and ROI: OWASP Zap is valued for its cost-effectiveness. Kiuwan, although more expensive, offers clear ROI through comprehensive functionality, appealing to those who prioritize an extensive suite of security tools despite higher costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan vs. OWASP Zap Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. OWASP Zap

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiuwan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (28th)

OWASP Zap

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OWASP Zap is 3.4%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OWASP Zap	3.4%
Kiuwan	1.1%
Other	95.5%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Nithin-K

Technical Analyst at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Open source testing tool empowers manual activities and has room to improve integration and reporting features

The improvement that has to be done for APIs focuses on manual activities where the feature exists, but it is not at the same level as what Burp Suite does with intercepting and tools such as Postman, so it needs improvement. There are limitations with authentication levels, particularly with form-based and cookie-based authentication. However, overall, we are satisfied with OWASP Zap as there are no major issues, and improving the scan engine could be beneficial. When comparing OWASP Zap and Burp Suite, the main difference besides pricing is that OWASP Zap has limitations with reporting levels and UI, which affects its reporting capabilities, whereas Burp Suite is already advancing with new AI features and scanning capabilities that OWASP Zap seems to be lacking.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"We switched because Kiuwan covers the entire SDLC; provides direct information to act upon, for the developer, architects, QA, CIO and CISO, in a few seconds; automatically, fully integrated in any CI/CD setup."

"The technical support is very good, and we have received valid answers to our questions."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"Customer service is excellent."

"This solution helps us to catch issues early on, and find problems that we never knew we had."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

More Kiuwan pros

"This is a very mature tool; it is capable of facilitating the work of many security experts, and I highly recommend it for beginners and advanced users when some other tools fail to catch traffic."

"The ZAP scan and code crawler are valuable features."

"One valuable feature of OWASP Zap is that it is simple to use."

"The product helps users to scan and fix vulnerabilities in the pipeline."

"The solution is good at reporting the vulnerabilities of the application."

"They offer free access to some other tools."

"The stability of the solution is very good."

"The interface is easy to use."

More OWASP Zap pros

Cons

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"For mobile development, we are not too experienced, and it is not the perfect tool because the integration with certain products is very manual."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."

"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."

More Kiuwan cons

"I'd like to see a kind of feature where we can just track what our last vulnerability was and how it has improved or not. More reports that can have some kind of base-lining, I think that would be a good feature too. I'm not sure whether it can be achieved and implement but I think that would really help."

"It would be nice to have a solid SQL injection engine built into Zap."

"The automated vulnerability assessments that the application performs needs to be simplified as well as diversified."

"I would like to see a version of “repeater” within OWASP ZAP, a tool capable of sending from one to 1000 of the same requests, but with preselected modified fields, changing from a predetermined word list, or manually created."

"I'd also like to see an improvement in test reports because we get too many false positives."

"The documentation needs to be improved because I had to learn everything from watching YouTube videos."

"The work that it does in the limited scope is good, but the scope is very limited in terms of the scanning features. The number of things it tests or finds is limited. They need to make it a more of a mainstream tool that people can use, and they can even think about having it on a proprietary basis. They need to increase the coverage of the scan and the results that it finds. That has always been Zap's limitation. Zap is a very good tool for a beginner, but once you start moving up the ladder where you want further details and you want your scan to show more in-depth results, Zap falls short because its coverage falls short. It does not have the capacity to do more."

"Reporting format has no output, is cluttered and very long."

More OWASP Zap cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Check with your account manager."

"It's free. It's good for us because we don't know what the extent of our use will be yet. It's good to start with something free and easy to use."

"It's free and open, currently under the Apache 2 license. If ZAP does what you need it to do, selling a free solution is a very easy."

"OWASP Zap is free to use."

"As Zap is free and open-source, with tons of features similar to those of commercial solutions, I would definitely recommend trying it out."

"OWASP ZAP is a free tool provided by OWASP’s engineers and experts. There is an option to donate."

"The solution’s pricing is high."

"The tool is open source."

"This solution is open source and free."

More OWASP Zap pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about OWASP Zap?

The best feature is the Zap HUD (Heads Up Display) because the customers can use the website normally. If we scan websites with automatic scanning, and the website has a web application firewall, i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OWASP Zap?

OWASP might be cost-effective, however, people prefer to use the free edition available as open source.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 25% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub vs Kiuwan

Compared 7% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Acunetix vs OWASP Zap

Compared 13% of the time

SonarQube vs OWASP Zap

Compared 12% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OWASP Zap

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OWASP Zap

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs OWASP Zap

Compared 8% of the time

More OWASP Zap Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

March 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Buyer's Guide

OWASP Zap

March 2026

Download OWASP Zap product report

Overview

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

OWASP Zap is a free and open-source web application security scanner.

The solution helps developers identify vulnerabilities in their web applications by actively scanning for common security issues.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, Zap is a popular choice among developers for ensuring the security of their web applications.

OWASP

Sample Customers

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. IBM 4. Amazon 5. Facebook 6. Twitter 7. LinkedIn 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. PayPal 11. Salesforce 12. Cisco 13. Oracle 14. Intel 15. HP 16. Dell 17. VMware 18. Symantec 19. McAfee 20. Citrix 21. Red Hat 22. Juniper Networks 23. SAP 24. Accenture 25. Deloitte 26. Ernst & Young 27. PwC 28. KPMG 29. Capgemini 30. Infosys 31. Wipro 32. TCS

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. OWASP Zap

March 2026

Free Report: Kiuwan vs. OWASP Zap

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. OWASP Zap and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiuwan vs. OWASP Zap report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.