We performed a comparison between Kiuwan and Qualys Web Application Scanning based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers very good technical support."
"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."
"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."
"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."
"The solution has a continuous integration process."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."
"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."
"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."
"By using QualysGuard, we are able to finish external scans with assured results in half the time."
"It is a very stable solution."
"Key features include: Cloud-based, so the installation is not so tedious. Easily deployed. Highly scalable. Comprehensive reporting."
"QualysGuard web-based scanner is very useful for performing external penetration and PCI scans from remote locations."
"It is easy to use."
"Licensing is the most valuable. Qualys provides the best licensing for companies. It is the best product for the development purposes of web applications. The product has a lot of integrations."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the progressive scan. It is good. It's done in 24 hours."
"The most valuable feature of Qualys Web Application Scanning is the effective scanning that can be done."
"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."
"The configuration hasn't been that good."
"Perhaps more languages supported."
"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."
"The QA developer and security could be improved."
"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."
"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."
"We procured around 110 licenses for Web Application Scanning, but we have issues running concurrent scans. I don't currently have the option to trigger scans for all 100-plus websites. The default limit is around 10 conference scans. It's not very scalable, to be honest, because of the limitation that they put on concurrent scans."
"The virus code updates are not frequent enough."
"The support could be faster."
"There could be better management and faster scanning."
"There should be better visibility into the application."
"The pricing does not seem to be competitive."
"It should have better automatic reporting."
"Deployment can be complicated."
More Qualys Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kiuwan is ranked 21st in Application Security Tools with 23 reviews while Qualys Web Application Scanning is ranked 19th in Application Security Tools with 31 reviews. Kiuwan is rated 8.6, while Qualys Web Application Scanning is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys Web Application Scanning writes "A stable solution that can be used for infrastructure vulnerability scanning and web application scanning". Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Veracode, Snyk and Fortify on Demand, whereas Qualys Web Application Scanning is most compared with OWASP Zap, Veracode, SonarQube, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify WebInspect. See our Kiuwan vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
