Kiuwan vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Kiuwan and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Kiuwan is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.8, while Tenable is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.6. Kiuwan holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Kiuwan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,474 Views
1,297 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

2,098 Views
1,636 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Kiuwan and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are leaders in application security assessment. Kiuwan is notable for its competitive pricing and reliable customer support, while Tenable.io is favored for its comprehensive features, offering robust solutions.

Features: Kiuwan provides static code analysis, integration capabilities, and supports a wide range of programming languages. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning offers robust vulnerability detection, continuous monitoring, and detailed scanning features.

Room for Improvement: Kiuwan needs development in dynamic analysis, reporting functionalities, and documentation details. Tenable.io users seek enhanced API accessibility, more comprehensive documentation, and improvements in user interface navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, beneficial for teams with limited security infrastructure experience. Tenable.io, while more complex to deploy, provides comprehensive user support and resources to facilitate the initial setup process.

Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan is considered cost-effective, quickly returning investment due to competitive setup costs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, although higher priced, offers significant ROI with its feature-rich offerings, ideal for enterprises requiring extensive security coverage.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (24th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Harshal Deshmukh

CEO and Managing Director at Digidata Infsystems Private Limited

Simple tool to use, good dashboard capabilities and offers asset criticality ratings

It has good dashboard capabilities and gives good results with priority ratings, asset criticality ratings, and exposure scores for vulnerabilities. It also provides automated web application scanning, which customers appreciate because it doesn't disturb the web application or hamper the business. While testing the web application, sometimes it happens that the website or application goes down. But with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it doesn't affect the business. It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices."

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

More Kiuwan pros

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"The solution is stable."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

More Kiuwan cons

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap."

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"The technical support needs improvement. Currently, it takes time, which might be due to the free version, but providing some level of support could encourage future purchase decisions."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"The platform's technical support services could be better."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Check with your account manager."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"The pricing is okay."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 48% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 20% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

August 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2025

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Overview

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

July 2025

Free Report: Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.