SonarQube Server and Kiuwan are key players in the code quality assurance category. While SonarQube Server is favored for its comprehensive language support and analytical capabilities, Kiuwan stands out for its speed and cost-effectiveness.
Features: SonarQube Server provides extensive support for over 20 programming languages, integration with numerous source control management tools, and the ability to create custom coding rules. It offers rich graphical insights into code quality. Kiuwan, on the other hand, is known for its fast scanning speed and detailed risk analyses. It allows for modular rule creation and comprehensive reporting across applications.
Room for Improvement: SonarQube Server users suggest enhancements in its security scanning granularity, interface usability, and reducing false positives. Better API documentation is also desired. Kiuwan could benefit from improved integration with development frameworks and more streamlined rule updates, alongside a modernization of its user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server offers flexible deployment across hybrid cloud, on-premises, and public clouds, with robust community support often compensating for limited direct technical support. Kiuwan also provides flexible deployment options, but there is feedback about the need for more responsive technical support. Both products' community forums are considered helpful, though direct support is more limited in SonarQube's free edition.
Pricing and ROI: SonarQube Server offers many free features, but its premium plugins and enterprise editions are noted as costly, yet justified by improved code quality and security. Kiuwan is perceived as more competitively priced, operating on a model that charges based on analyzed lines of code. Despite pricing differences, both products deliver significant ROI through enhanced code quality and reduced vulnerabilities.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) | 20.8% |
| Kiuwan | 1.1% |
| Other | 78.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 75 |
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.
SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.
What are the key features of SonarQube Server?Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
