SonarQube and Kiuwan compete in the software quality and security analysis market. Based on the data comparisons, SonarQube holds the upper hand due to its extensive language support and wide community adoption.
Features: SonarQube Server supports a wide array of programming languages and offers robust features like pre-commit checks, custom coding rules, and integration with various CVSs. It excels in code metrics visualization and provides flexibility in quality gate policies. It is open-source and mandatory compliance makes it appealing for enterprise-level projects. Kiuwan provides rapid local scanning and detailed vulnerability assessments, offering agile security insights with a focus on effective vulnerability management and detailed mitigation steps.
Room for Improvement: SonarQube users suggest enhancing security features, streamlining update mechanisms, and improving dashboard efficiency. Calls for a more intuitive UI and better handling of false positives are also noted. Kiuwan needs improvement in installation processes and report customization. Users desire integrations with more languages and simplification of the UI alongside better handling of false positives and enhanced IDE integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube offers deployment in on-premises and hybrid environments with strong community support, although users seek faster response times in technical assistance. Kiuwan emphasizes ease of use and public cloud flexibility but faces challenges with seamless IDE integration, and differences in support availability impact community engagement.
Pricing and ROI: SonarQube's open-source model provides substantial value, while paid options cater to advanced features. Though more expensive than Kiuwan, its comprehensive language support justifies the cost for extensive use cases. Kiuwan positions itself as a cost-effective alternative with clear pricing based on lines of code, showing good ROI through improved code quality and reduced rework.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) | 20.4% |
| Kiuwan | 1.1% |
| Other | 78.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 75 |
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.
SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.
What are the key features of SonarQube Server?Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
