We performed a comparison between GitHub and Kiuwan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This product is very good for storing and versioning code."
"GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"I did not have any issues with the stability of Github. It worked seamlessly."
"GitHub's source code management is top-notch. It's easy to inspect changes and visualize code and differences. Their action system is comprehensive in terms of making changes and automation."
"I'm able to access any repository that I like, whether it's public or private."
"The solution can scale."
"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."
"The solution has a continuous integration process."
"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."
"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."
"The solution offers very good technical support."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."
"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."
"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."
"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."
"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."
"Our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH."
"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."
"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements."
"GitHub could add some more security features."
"Lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided."
"GitHub could add more security features. I am not sure how secure it is. If they provide more security features, then it can be used in more official applications."
"I would like to see additional languages supported."
"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."
"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."
"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."
"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."
"The configuration hasn't been that good."
"Perhaps more languages supported."
GitHub is ranked 13th in Application Security Tools with 64 reviews while Kiuwan is ranked 22nd in Application Security Tools with 23 reviews. GitHub is rated 8.6, while Kiuwan is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and Fortify on Demand, whereas Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Snyk, Veracode and Fortify on Demand. See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
