GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while Kiuwan is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.0. GitHub holds a 1.0% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,342 Views
1,972 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,647 Views
1,367 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

GitHub and Kiuwan both compete in the software development tools category, with a focus on different aspects of the development lifecycle. GitHub seems to have an upper hand in collaboration and development integration, while Kiuwan specializes in application security and code quality.

Features: GitHub provides extensive features for version control and code collaboration, including Git Hooks and SSH keys. Its robust source code management system is complemented by excellent automation and seamless integration with third-party tools. Kiuwan, on the other hand, concentrates on application security and code quality, offering detailed reports and analysis to improve these areas. Its modularity and capability to create new rules enhance its appeal for security audits.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance merging functionalities, simplify user interactions, and expand features for non-developers. Additionally, better integration with DevOps tools and stronger security measures are suggested enhancements. Kiuwan could improve its user interface and integration with common development environments, and needs to focus on scalability and multi-language support for a broader appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is widely used in Public and Hybrid Cloud environments, with its extensive community support offsetting average technical support. Kiuwan, available for on-premises setups, requires more hands-on management, relying on internal staff for deployment and maintenance, with sporadic customer service availability.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a mix of free and enterprise options, being generally affordable but with additional costs for private repositories and enterprise support. Its open-source nature results in significant long-term cost savings and a notable ROI due to its collaboration features. Kiuwan, though competitively priced per lines of code scanned, may incur costs based on usage, lacking free repository offerings, yet still delivers measurable ROI by enhancing security and code quality.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.0%
Kiuwan	1.1%
Other	97.9%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Anshul Anshul

Sr. Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Efficient and accurate scanning, and detailed analysis

In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further. Another issue I've encountered is that Kiuwan only looks at the version of components and doesn't take into account any workaround fixes that have been implemented at the code level. This can result in false positives being reported. Additionally, these issues are in the "insights" tab and not in the code base security aspect. Lastly, when muting findings that are false positives, there should be an option to see the only available at the code level rather than at the organization level because it can lead to missing vulnerabilities if they are muted at the org level. An additional feature that would be helpful is the ability to easily download reports from Kiuwan. Specifically, in the "insights" tab, we have been encountering an error when trying to download the PDF report. We are able to download the code-based security report, but not the insights report. This has been an ongoing issue for the past couple of months and would be beneficial if it could be resolved. My main recommendation would be to address the issues with downloading reports that we have been experiencing. Additionally, it would be helpful if Kiuwan could support a wider range of programming languages, as there are currently some that are not compatible with the tool. If the code of a particular application falls under the category which is not compatible with Kiuwan, then it will not be able to scan it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"GitHub's version control is valuable."

"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."

"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."

"The code sharing and updated history are valuable features."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"GitHub is easy, secure, and widely documented."

More GitHub pros

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice."

"The solution could have better support for the Markdown language."

"It would be useful to have tutorial videos within the GitHub dashboard."

"The UI is a little outdated, so that could be improved."

"The merging features can be improved."

"It would be better if the amount of storage were increased."

"GitHub storage is one of the main requirements and it could improve."

"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."

More GitHub cons

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Check with your account manager."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

University

11%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 44% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

December 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.