Veracode and Kiuwan are both prominent players in the application security testing market. Veracode is often preferred for its comprehensive range of features and reliable customer support, while Kiuwan is noted for its robustness and efficient pricing structure.
Features: Veracode offers static, dynamic, and software composition analysis, ensuring thorough vulnerability detection. It provides a comprehensive security testing suite ideal for addressing a wide range of security issues. Kiuwan is known for its strong integration capabilities, detailed code quality analysis, and flexible deployment options, making it a suitable choice for environments needing adaptability and deep code insights.
Room for Improvement: Veracode could enhance reporting functionalities, improve scan speed, and refine user learning experience. Kiuwan users see potential improvements in enhancing user experience, expanding documentation clarity, and evolving the user interface for better usability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode has a straightforward deployment process, though the learning curve may be challenging; customer service generally receives positive marks. Kiuwan is recognized for its easy deployment and high-quality customer support, often noted for its simplicity and effective issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: Veracode is often seen as a premium product with higher initial costs, yet it delivers long-term ROI with its expansive security capabilities. Kiuwan offers a more budget-friendly approach with competitive pricing and reasonable ROI, appealing to users focused on cost savings.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Veracode | 8.0% |
| Kiuwan | 1.1% |
| Other | 90.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 69 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 43 |
| Large Enterprise | 112 |
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.
Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.
What are the key features of Veracode?
What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?
Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.
Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
