Ixia BreakingPoint and Kiuwan are tools in network security and software analysis. Ixia BreakingPoint seems to have the upper hand in comprehensive testing capabilities, while Kiuwan is noted for robust code analysis.
Features: Ixia BreakingPoint offers extensive network protocols, attack simulation capabilities, and comprehensive testing abilities for deep security assessments. Kiuwan provides strong static code analysis, integration capabilities, and software development alignment.
Room for Improvement: Ixia BreakingPoint users suggest improvements in user-friendly documentation, complexity reduction, and learning curve enhancement. Kiuwan users recommend enhancing speed performance, reporting features, and optimizing platform performance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia BreakingPoint is noted as challenging to deploy with significant resource needs, though its customer service is positively rated. Kiuwan is easier to deploy, but customer service experiences are mixed, indicating areas for service improvement.
Pricing and ROI: Ixia BreakingPoint pricing is considered high, offering strong ROI for its advanced capabilities. Kiuwan is seen as cost-effective, providing good value through comprehensive analysis, making it suitable for smaller budgets.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Kiuwan | 1.0% |
| Ixia BreakingPoint | 0.4% |
| Other | 98.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
