OpenText Core Application Security and Kiuwan compete in the application security category. OpenText has the upper hand due to its comprehensive approach, which benefits users who prioritize manual review and vulnerability insights.
Features: OpenText Core Application Security shines with its integration of static and dynamic results, reducing false positives and providing correlated insights. It stands out for its detailed vulnerability insights and its ability to connect with development platforms for seamless bug classification. In contrast, Kiuwan's noteworthy features include its modularity, quick scan efficiency, and actionable reporting, making it an excellent choice for rapid assessments.
Room for Improvement: OpenText needs to enhance integration with incident management processes and improve dynamic scanning speeds while further reducing false positives. Streamlining reporting and overcoming integration challenges are key areas for development. Kiuwan should focus on improving compatibility with diverse development environments and programming languages, further reducing false positives, and enhancing its user interface for a smoother experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers diverse deployment options, focusing on on-premises environments but also accommodating hybrid and cloud solutions. Its customer service is generally positive, though response times could be quicker. Kiuwan supports cloud and on-premises environments with a customer service team known for being helpful, albeit with occasional delays.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText, while expensive, offers flexible licensing models and is valued for its contribution to security issue reductions. Kiuwan is praised for its cost-effectiveness, especially with pricing related to lines of code, and provides substantial value, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.
OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.
What features define OpenText Core Application Security?Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
