OpenText Core Application Security and Kiuwan compete in the application security space. Users prefer OpenText for its pricing and support, while Kiuwan is favored for its features and usability.
Features: OpenText stands out with its compliance capabilities and expert-reviewed results, providing a broad range of application management tools. Kiuwan is praised for its fast scanning capabilities and comprehensive reporting, which enhance usability and user satisfaction.
Room for Improvement: OpenText needs to improve reporting, integration with bug tracking systems, and reduce false positives. Enhancements in dynamic scanning time and false positive management are also recommended. Kiuwan requires better integration with development tools and an improved user interface, alongside enhanced dependency scanning and solutions for false positives.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers flexibility with various deployment models, including hybrid and public cloud options, and is praised for excellent customer service from the TAM team, despite needing more responsive technical support. Kiuwan provides similar deployment options but lacks the versatility of OpenText, and while customer service is good, it sometimes lacks responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText's subscription model is expensive, which may deter users, although negotiating pricing might improve affordability. Kiuwan is more economical, charging based on lines of code, making it a cost-effective option for different user needs with straightforward pricing.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Core Application Security | 3.9% |
| Kiuwan | 1.1% |
| Other | 95.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.
OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.
What features define OpenText Core Application Security?Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
