Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Kiuwan | 1.2% |
| SonarQube | 13.6% |
| Checkmarx One | 8.8% |
| Other | 76.4% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SonarQube | 4.0 | 13.6% | 84% | 136 interviewsAdd to research |
| Snyk | 4.1 | 5.1% | 100% | 51 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 77 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
| Large Enterprise | 96 |
Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and security integration for continuous deployment. Developers can perform efficient local or cloud-based scans, benefiting from action plans for better code correction. Integration with tools like Jenkins facilitates quick processing and detailed risk assessments, while challenges remain in language support expansion and smoother integration with Azure DevOps and popular IDEs. Enhanced frameworks and mobile development testing would amplify its utility, with users seeking improved navigation, report downloading, and technical support.
What are the most important features of Kiuwan?In industries focused on software development, Kiuwan is integral for security and vulnerability assessments. It's embedded into workflows to analyze, detect and correct vulnerabilities, addressing threats like SQL injection and adhering to OWASP Top 10. The tool supports secure coding practices and performance evaluation, aiding organizations in maintaining rigorous security standards.
DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I find Kiuwan useful for secure code reviews, detecting vulnerabilities, and protecting sensitive data. It quickly processes reports but needs UI improvements, as its interface resembles older Windows versions, making user experience less optimal. |
| Application Architect at IBM | 4.0 | I use Kiuwan to modify and enhance code, focusing on efficiency and comprehensive information. It effectively handles controllers and interfaces, but streamlining calls and improving transitions would enhance performance. Its functionality is crucial for our project's diverse code requirements. |
| Sr. Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use Kiuwan for quick SaaS scans of web applications, valuing its speed and detailed vulnerability analysis. It beats competitors like Veracode. However, duplicate findings and download issues in reports need improvement, alongside broader programming language compatibility. |
| Security consultant at Entelgy Innotec Security | 4.0 | I use Kiuwan for code assessment and issue resolution, appreciating its modularity and efficient rule creation. However, integration with development frameworks could be improved. Despite time-consuming updates, Kiuwan is essential, preventing costly errors and offering valuable insights. |
| Information Security Manager at ITC SOLUCIONES TECNOLOGICAS S.A.S | 4.5 | I use Kiuwan for vulnerability testing, valuing its local scanning for security and early issue detection. I'd like better support (chat/phone) and usage-based pricing. Despite minor maintenance, I recommend this excellent, easy-to-setup platform. |
| Information Security Officer at Umniah | 4.0 | I value Kiuwan's stability, scalability, and good remediation. However, initial setup and support were problematic, its configuration assessment is weak, and free tools offer comparable quality, making its cost a concern. |
| Cyber Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I develop use cases to improve code quality and address vulnerabilities. Kiuwan offers valuable options for enhancing code quality and security, although limited library alternatives require extensive modifications. It is more user-friendly than Checkmarx, Veracode, and Fortify. |
| Information Security Specialist at a tech company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I use Kiuwan for FinTech code analysis, valuing its detailed reports on risk and vulnerability. However, integration needs improvement, and report effectiveness is questionable, as it missed key issues. I rate it an eight. |
