Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Kiuwan comparison

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

3,551 Views
2,841 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Kiuwan and Check Point WAF compete in the domain of application security solutions, focusing on code quality and web application protection respectively. Check Point WAF seems to have the upper hand given its advanced security capabilities, such as AI-driven threat prevention and zero-day attack protection, which are critical for handling diverse IT challenges.

Features: Kiuwan provides quick code scanning, integration with Jenkins and JIRA, and supports various programming languages. Check Point WAF offers AI-driven threat prevention, zero-day attack protection, and API security, making it ideal for comprehensive web application protection.

Room for Improvement: Kiuwan can enhance language and framework support, UI, and integration with Azure DevOps. Check Point WAF could simplify its UI, reduce setup complexity, and improve API security depth and bot protection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments with fast deployment but needs to improve customer support. Check Point WAF offers broader cloud environment support and generally positive customer service, though it faces initial setup complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan is cost-effective with a subscription model based on lines of code and offers good time-to-market and code quality improvements. Check Point WAF is pricier regarding licensing and setup costs but is justified by its comprehensive features. Both are seen as valuable investments, with Kiuwan focusing on cost-effectiveness and Check Point WAF offering stronger security features at a higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: August 2026).

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Kiuwan

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

33rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	0.9%
Kiuwan	1.1%
Other	98.0%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can maintain a legal framework structure at all times."

"Machine learning is a valuable tool for this assessment because it allows for a two-phase approach: secure and non-secure."

"It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running."

"Among its most outstanding features is the powerful AI in container security; above all, it is one of the most powerful and easy-to-manage solutions."

"Automation has helped a lot to identify and automatically execute policies, rules, and blocks due to its machine learning."

"User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF has improved our organization by providing protection against web application attacks such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and bot threats."

"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"Saving time and money by automatically identifying problems is unbelievable."

"We switched because Kiuwan covers the entire SDLC; provides direct information to act upon, for the developer, architects, QA, CIO and CISO, in a few seconds; automatically, fully integrated in any CI/CD setup."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the continuous integration process, which enables us to make the best in terms of security of our solution and not introduce new mistakes, with problems solved step by step."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"We have been using this solution for one and a half years."

"The technical support is very good, and we have received valid answers to our questions."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The web user interface needs some improvement, even though the functionality is good."

"The User interface can be improved, especially for 1st time user."

"For Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), the negative aspects include the very high price, complex licensing, and the need for specialized trained people to configure it, which is comparatively more complicated than other firewalls like Palo Alto and FortiGate."

"I am satisfied with the performance and results enhanced by this product since we deployed it."

"It was costlier than other solutions."

"Deeper and more transparent integration between Cloud Application Security and analysis monitoring tools could be very valuable - although the solution currently offers integrations with third-party security tools."

"The ease of use could be better."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved; initially, the setup is very complicated, and there's not a lot of documentation available, plus it didn't have something for anti-bot, but other than that, it is fine."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"We faced a lot of problems with the initial setup and support gave us difficulties around the installation."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"Improvement could be made with the integration of the programming tools."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Check with your account manager."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

12%

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 19% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 13% of the time

GitHub vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.

Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and security integration for continuous deployment. Developers can perform efficient local or cloud-based scans, benefiting from action plans for better code correction. Integration with tools like Jenkins facilitates quick processing and detailed risk assessments, while challenges remain in language support expansion and smoother integration with Azure DevOps and popular IDEs. Enhanced frameworks and mobile development testing would amplify its utility, with users seeking improved navigation, report downloading, and technical support.

What are the most important features of Kiuwan?

Fast Scanning: Provides quick scans for immediate insights.
Reporting: Robust features for generating detailed reports.
Intuitive UI: Easy-to-navigate interface.
Technology Coverage: Supports a range of languages from COBOL to JS.
Tool Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins for CI/CD processes.
Modularity: Allows specific models for targeted analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Kiuwan reviews?

Enhanced Code Security: Identifies vulnerabilities swiftly and efficiently.
Continuous Integration: Facilitates ongoing security assessments.
Improved Code Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to coding standards.
Actionable Insights: Provides risk assessments with actionable recommendations.

In industries focused on software development, Kiuwan is integral for security and vulnerability assessments. It's embedded into workflows to analyze, detect and correct vulnerabilities, addressing threats like SQL injection and adhering to OWASP Top 10. The tool supports secure coding practices and performance evaluation, aiding organizations in maintaining rigorous security standards.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Kiuwan