Top 10 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

44 reviews
85% willing to recommend

Top BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity surpasses its competitors by utilizing advanced AI-driven threat prevention, offering predictive security solutions, and delivering unparalleled protection against both known and unknown cyber threats, ensuring robust security measures for businesses worldwide.

BlackBerry Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with BlackBerry, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon excels with strong EDR capabilities and advanced threat hunting, favored for comprehensive threat visibility. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity emphasizes low CPU usage and AI-driven threat detection, making it appealing for resource efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost than BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity. BlackBerry Cylance offers a more cost-effective setup, while CrowdStrike Falcon may provide additional features that could justify its higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

BlackBerry Cylance focuses on AI-driven threat protection with low CPU usage and strong zero-day defense. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers seamless Microsoft ecosystem integration with strong endpoint protection, making it advantageous for users seeking bundled solutions with machine learning capabilities.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity features a lower setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers more robust initial support options, highlighting the cost-effective approach of BlackBerry compared to the comprehensive features provided by Microsoft.

View comparison

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides extensive security with advanced machine learning, suitable for complex environments. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity focuses on lightweight, AI-driven threat detection, excelling in efficiency for smaller infrastructures seeking lower resource usage. Both offer strong protection with distinct benefits.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a streamlined setup cost, whereas BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity's setup costs may involve higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a streamlined setup cost, whereas BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity's setup costs may involve higher initial investment.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity emphasizes AI-driven endpoint protection for lightweight, simple security. In comparison, Cortex XDR offers extensive integration and behavior-based detection for robust threat visibility. BlackBerry's competitive pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while Cortex XDR suits those needing comprehensive network security solutions.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity features lower setup costs compared to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, which offers more comprehensive integration with existing infrastructure.

View comparison

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity features lower setup costs compared to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, which offers more comprehensive integration with existing infrastructure.

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity excels in AI-driven threat protection and requires no regular updates. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient integrates seamlessly with FortiGate, offering comprehensive features like web filtering and VPN. BlackBerry is premium priced, while Fortinet's pricing is attractive for budget-conscious buyers.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity has higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, attracting those looking for cost-effective cybersecurity solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers AI-driven threat detection and cloud-based simplicity, appealing to those valuing ease and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, HP Wolf Security provides hardware-enforced protection with comprehensive features, attracting tech buyers seeking integrated, robust security solutions despite higher costs.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. HP Wolf Security Report

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity involves lower setup costs, whereas HP Wolf Security requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity involves lower setup costs, whereas HP Wolf Security requires a higher initial investment.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security excels in central management and flexibility, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive oversight. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is valued for lightweight design and advanced machine learning, making it ideal for seamless protection against zero-day threats.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a higher setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, which offers a more budget-friendly setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a higher setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, which offers a more budget-friendly setup process.

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security provides comprehensive protection with extensive features but can be resource-intensive. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers lightweight, AI-driven protection with a focus on proactive prevention, making it ideal for those seeking advanced technology despite its higher cost.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security typically involves higher setup costs compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, reflecting differences in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security typically involves higher setup costs compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, reflecting differences in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business

4.0 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business

4.0 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cost-effective with strong user protection and centralized management, suitable for large deployments. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance offers AI-driven protection and minimal resource usage, appealing to those seeking advanced threat management despite higher costs.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers a competitive setup cost, whereas BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity presents a more premium option; the choice hinges on budget constraints and specific security needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One attracts tech buyers with comprehensive threat protection and extensive integration. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance appeals to those prioritizing AI-driven security, especially for zero-day threats. Trend Vision One is valued for its cost-efficiency, while BlackBerry Cylance is valued for sophisticated AI capabilities.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security incurs a lower setup cost than BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, highlighting its affordability. Conversely, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers more advanced features, justifying its higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 20 more products

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Threat Intelligence Platforms