Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: November 2022).
653,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Works well for test management and is a good testing repository."

More Tricentis qTest Pros →

"It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money.""It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."

More Zephyr Enterprise Pros →

Cons
"Could use additional integration so that there is a testing automation continuum."

More Tricentis qTest Cons →

"We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility.""The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there.""The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."

More Zephyr Enterprise Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "DFS is more expensive than Zephyr. DFS is around $32 per person, whereas Zephyr is $10 per person. There is a major difference in the price, which is the main reason why we are trying to shift to Zephyr."
  • "It costs a couple of thousand dollars for a little more than 125 users, per month."
  • More Zephyr Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    653,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Works well for test management and is a good testing repository.
    Top Answer:We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support.
    Top Answer:I'd like to see better integration in the platform so that there is a testing automation continuum, where customers can easily mature through qTest and Tosca functionalities.
    Top Answer:It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money.
    Top Answer:The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there. Those are most likely the two major areas.
    Top Answer:We have been working with DFS for almost six or seven years. We have a lot of automation in our own framework, and DFS is supporting that framework. We have integrated DFS with our automation… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    6,112
    Comparisons
    2,921
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    184
    Rating
    8.0
    5th
    Views
    5,026
    Comparisons
    2,480
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    566
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    qTest
    SmartBear Zephyr
    Learn More
    Overview

    Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality. 

    Zephyr Enterprise is a robust enterprise test management platform that manages all aspects of the testing lifecycle. The solution is provided as an on-premise installation as well as a SaaS-based installation. Zephyr Enterprise enables you to make a rigid process flow flexible enough to accommodate changes. In addition, it provides all the functionality QA teams and testers need in order to create and execute test cases with less effort, allowing more time to do actual testing by alleviating significant time-wasting steps.

    Zephyr Enterprise Features

    Zephyr Enterprise has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Visual dashboards
    • One-click integration
    • Multi Jira instance
    • Scalability
    • Third-Party Integrations
    • Reporting & Statistics
    • Data Import/Export
    • Data Visualization
    • User Management
    • Move & Copy
    • Software Testing Management
    • Requirements-Based Testing
    • Industry-strength scalability
    • Documented APIs
    • Regular maintenance and upgrades

    Zephyr Enterprise Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Zephyr Enterprise. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Ready-to-use reports and customizable dashboards: With Zephyr Enterprise, reports and dashboards are updated in real time and you can share test results and link with your team in Jira to connect any known issues. In addition, the solution helps you increase workflow efficiency because it improves info sharing during standup meetings.
    • Supports bi-directional and multi-instance Jira integration: Not only does Zephyr Enterprise support bi-directional and multi-instance Jira integration, but it also gives you the ability to support multiple projects simultaneously – up to 200,000 test cases.
    • Global repository for test cases: Zephyr Enterprise helps you create, categorize, and store your test cases via a global repository that can be shared across your entire organization. You can also quickly reuse test cases using the structured folder management.
    • Test execution: Zephyr Enterprise makes it possible for you to execute tests step by step, manage pass/fail status, and launch automated execution, then file those defects into Jira. Zephyr Enterprise test executions allow teams to operate in a more efficient way.

    • Universal test automation: Zephyr Enterprise supports a wide range of automation frameworks, helping you decrease operational costs and increase test coverage.

      Reviews from Real Users

      Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Zephyr Enterprise solution.

      A Manager of Enterprise Applications at a retailer says what’s most valuable is that “It's very easy and simple to use, which is beneficial. It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money.” He also adds, “Zephyr Enterprise is very stable and the initial setup is straightforward.”

      Jawaad A., Test Automation Lead at Trapeze, explains, "It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."
    Offer
    Learn more about Tricentis qTest
    Learn more about Zephyr Enterprise
    Sample Customers
    McKesson, Accenture, Nationwide Insurance, Allianz, Telstra, Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton (LVMH PCIS), and Vodafone
    Hyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Insurance Company22%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: November 2022.
    653,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Tricentis qTest is ranked 4th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while Zephyr Enterprise is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews. Tricentis qTest is rated 8.0, while Zephyr Enterprise is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Tricentis qTest writes "Great for test management and automates a lot of the testing functions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zephyr Enterprise writes "Zero maintenance, with excellent technical support, easy to install and use". Tricentis qTest is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, TFS and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, whereas Zephyr Enterprise is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TFS, Tricentis Tosca and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.