Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Tricentis and Microsoft are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. Tricentis holds a 14.4% mindshare in TMT, compared to Microsoft’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Tricentis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Tricentis qTest
Read 19 Tricentis qTest reviews
  • 1,791 Views
  • 1,290 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Read 52 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews
  • 954 Views
  • 239 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Visual Studio Test Professional and Tricentis qTest are two leading test management solutions. Tricentis qTest appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive features and robust functionality.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional integrates seamlessly with Azure DevOps, manages test cases efficiently with Microsoft tools, and ensures streamlined workflows. Tricentis qTest supports Agile and DevOps methodologies, offers superior automation capabilities, and provides advanced reporting features. qTest's comprehensive feature set makes it suitable for complex testing environments.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional needs better automation, more flexible reporting options, and an improved user interface. Tricentis qTest could enhance usability, improve integration with third-party tools, and streamline the setup process. Focusing on these enhancements would significantly benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional's straightforward deployment suits Microsoft-centric environments but has less responsive customer service. Tricentis qTest has a more complex deployment due to broader tool integration but offers highly responsive and supportive customer service. qTest's customer support is a notable advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is cost-effective for Microsoft product users. Tricentis qTest has higher upfront costs but provides better ROI due to its extensive features and capabilities. The comprehensive feature set and better ROI make qTest a more attractive long-term option.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,655 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.0
Tricentis qTest enhances efficiency and returns with easy use, reusable features, and rapid adoption, despite skill set challenges.
Sentiment score
7.3
Visual Studio Test Professional boosts productivity and ROI, enhancing development speed and quality, while varying ROI across companies.
Due to the fast adoption, there is a quick ROI along with faster and better maintenance due to Tosca's AI and self-healing aspects.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
1.0
Tricentis qTest support is generally quick and helpful but occasionally struggles with initial delays and setup communication.
Sentiment score
7.1
Visual Studio Test Professional's support is well-rated for responsiveness, knowledgeable staff, and helpful resources, despite navigation challenges.
Support has never been an issue, except for consulting which Tricentis charges for.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Tricentis qTest offers excellent scalability and ease of use for global teams, despite complex navigation for some users.
Sentiment score
7.5
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly scalable, effectively supporting various team sizes and projects despite cost and infrastructure considerations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Tricentis qTest is stable with minimal downtime, though users note occasional glitches and room for stability improvements.
Sentiment score
7.9
Visual Studio Test Professional is generally stable, with updates enhancing reliability, though occasional performance issues are reported.
As for stability and performance, apart from a few hiccups and glitches, Tricentis qTest worked fine.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
 

Room For Improvement

Tricentis qTest needs faster reporting, better API documentation, improved JIRA integration, UI updates, and enhanced user management.
Visual Studio Test Professional needs improved performance, integration, usability, compatibility, and support for automation and web application testing.
It also does not allow for task tracking or calculating time spent on tasks, which affects project timelines.
There may be missing features that should be included in the next release of Tricentis qTest, such as integration with other tools, specifically integration with Parasoft.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
PA
reviewer2772063 - PeerSpot reviewer
CC
ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewerVaibhav Kaneria - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Tricentis qTest offers competitive yearly pricing for shared global licenses, with costs varying based on package size and features.
Visual Studio Test Professional is costly but offers competitive value, priced at $52 monthly per user, with multi-user discounts.
The solution is expensive.
The pricing and execution of qTest are easy.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
The price is expensive.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
reviewer2356440 - PeerSpot reviewer
PA
CC
 

Valuable Features

Tricentis qTest offers intuitive test management, agile lifecycle support, and seamless integrations to enhance efficiency and global collaboration.
Visual Studio Test Professional excels in code testing, user interface, integration, debugging, and scalability for efficient software development.
There are also AI insights available based on the data and defects raised, which gives a view of functionalities where there are challenges and where more regression needs to happen.
A valuable feature is the ease of uploading, as well as creating folders.
I have seen measurable benefits with Tricentis qTest in terms of time-saving and resource-saving.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
reviewer2356440 - PeerSpot reviewer
PA
reviewer2772063 - PeerSpot reviewer
CC
ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Tricentis qTest
Ranking in Test Management Tools
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Tricentis qTest is 14.4%, up from 13.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 2.7%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tricentis qTest14.4%
Visual Studio Test Professional2.7%
Other82.9%
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SamuLehikoinen - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient and collaborative software testing providing comprehensive test management capabilities, seamless integration with various tools and impressive manual regression testing features
The user interface has a somewhat outdated design, which is certainly an area that could be improved. Some of the modules appear to be loosely connected, but despite these aspects, our overall experience with the tool was positive. When you begin integrating your testing tools with qTest, the available examples may not be very clear, and I believe this is an area that could be enhanced, particularly in terms of providing clearer integration guidance. While the tool's integration with various testing tools is impressive, there is room for improvement in showcasing more cases and benefits, especially through additional videos and documentation.
Read full review
ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides extensive extensions and plugins for seamless AI product development
Our primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional is as a development tool. We develop software primarily in Python, specifically for applications related to artificial intelligence. We use frameworks like PyTorch for training models and developing applications using these models. This tool…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Tricentis qTest?
I found the reporting aspect to be the most valuable as it provided a comprehensive overview of the efforts needed and the workload for individual tests.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis qTest?
The solution is expensive. For the features that are available, depending on the volumes of licenses we get, we are able to get better discounts as strategic partners of Tosca. We can pass some ben...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Tricentis qTest?
Customers are moving towards Tricentis due to their association with SAP. There is interest in understanding if there are connectors for converting UFT scripts to Tosca, as many customers are looki...
See all answers
What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?
The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions. This feature would save time by providing direct assi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 33% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis qTest Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 24% of the time
TestRail vs Tricentis qTest Logo
TestRail vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 13% of the time
Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest Logo
Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 7% of the time
PractiTest vs Tricentis qTest Logo
PractiTest vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 3% of the time
More Tricentis qTest Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 18% of the time
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 15% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 14% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 13% of the time
TFS vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
TFS vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 9% of the time
More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest
October 2025
Tricentis qTest reportDownload Tricentis qTest product report
Buyer's Guide
Visual Studio Test Professional
October 2025
Visual Studio Test Professional reportDownload Visual Studio Test Professional product report
 

Also Known As

qTest
No data available
 

Overview

Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality. 

Tricentis
Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

McKesson, Accenture, Nationwide Insurance, Allianz, Telstra, Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton (LVMH PCIS), and Vodafone
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
September 2025
Free Report: Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.