

Spiceworks and ScienceLogic compete in the IT infrastructure management space. ScienceLogic offers advanced features catering to larger enterprises, giving it an upper hand in customization and integration.
Features: Spiceworks provides free inventory tools, helpdesk capabilities, and easy installation, appealing to small and medium businesses. ScienceLogic focuses on extensive customization, monitoring diverse IT environments, and offers advanced automation features suited for large enterprises.
Room for Improvement: Spiceworks could improve its monitoring, reporting, and customization options. ScienceLogic requires enhancements in user interface simplicity, reporting, and more self-service functionalities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spiceworks is primarily on-premises with a strong community-driven customer service but lacks formal direct support. ScienceLogic is available on-premises, private, and public cloud, offering comprehensive technical support, though customization might present learning challenges.
Pricing and ROI: Spiceworks offers a significant advantage with its free pricing model, providing good ROI for basic IT support. ScienceLogic requires substantial investment, with licensing based on endpoints, but offers extensive features suited for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive monitoring solutions.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
Additionally, it is free software.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ScienceLogic | 1.6% |
| Spiceworks | 0.5% |
| Other | 97.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.