ScienceLogic and Datadog compete in the monitoring solutions category. Datadog appears to have the upper hand due to its feature-rich tools and robust real user monitoring capabilities, favored by users for distributed environment monitoring.
Features: ScienceLogic offers a customizable platform with multi-tenancy support, extensive event correlation, and AWS integration. Datadog provides versatile observability with broad integrations, application performance monitoring (APM), and synthetic testing, excelling in real user monitoring.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic's interface could be simplified, and its knowledge base needs enhancement. Users also note areas for improvement in SNMP trap processing and reporting capabilities. Datadog faces challenges with cost predictability and integration nuances, requiring more comprehensive documentation and pricing transparency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic offers flexible deployment for on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, making it suitable for complex infrastructures, while Datadog simplifies scaling across public and private clouds. ScienceLogic's customer service is praised for its responsive support, whereas Datadog users see room for improvement in pricing transparency despite its capable support.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic operates on a device-based pricing model, offering clear ROI through incident reduction and improved monitoring capacity. Datadog is recognized for its feature richness but may be costly for smaller businesses, prompting users to monitor costs to prevent unexpected expenses.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
The documentation is adequate, but team members coming into a project could benefit from more guided, interactive tutorials, ideally leveraging real-world data.
There should be a clearer view of the expenses.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
Our architecture is written in several languages, and one area where Datadog particularly shines is in providing first-class support for a multitude of programming languages.
The technology itself is generally very useful.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
It offers over 500 integrations with a wide range of device types, referred to as PowerPacks, which are prebuilt integrations for hundreds, if not thousands, of integration types.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.
Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.
What are the key features of Datadog?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.