ScienceLogic vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor comparison

ScienceLogic and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ScienceLogic is ranked #29 with an average rating of 9.0, while SolarWinds is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. ScienceLogic holds a 1.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

7,778 Views
4,200 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Network Device M...

Read 23 SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reviews

2,818 Views
2,762 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

SolarWinds Network Device M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and SolarWinds Network Device Monitor are competitors in the network monitoring category. ScienceLogic has the upper hand with its comprehensive customization and integration capabilities, while SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is favored for straightforward monitoring.

Features: ScienceLogic provides customizable solutions that allow management of multi-tenant environments, sophisticated dashboards, and reporting flexibility. It enables dynamic apps tailored to customer needs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor focuses on effective network data movement monitoring, setting alert thresholds, and features like device discovery and manual MIB integration.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic needs to enhance its reporting capabilities, improve usability, and streamline integration with external platforms. Users report difficulties with initial setup and navigating complex features, showing a need for out-of-the-box dashboards. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could improve user-friendliness and offer more detailed monitoring, particularly at the database and application-level topology. It faces security concerns needing attention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic and SolarWinds Network Device Monitor offer both on-premises and cloud deployment. ScienceLogic is praised for its exceptional customer and technical support with rapid response times. SolarWinds' support is knowledgeable and well-regarded but can encounter response delays.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is an expensive enterprise-level solution, with costs based on devices and storage needs, yet offers vast capabilities and potential ROI through reduced incident response times. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is competitively priced, offering a balance between costs and effective monitoring features with reasonable licensing fees, contributing to positive ROI through enhanced visibility and efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (14th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (19th), IT Operations Analytics (9th), Cloud Monitoring Software (13th), AIOps (13th)

SolarWinds Network Device M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

28th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor	0.9%
ScienceLogic	1.4%
Other	97.7%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Pallagani Siva Koteswararao

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Comprehensive monitoring streamlines operations with room for user support enhancement

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support team. Whenever we encounter difficulties, I raise vendor cases and am eager to deepen my understanding of those cases. Additionally, I want to learn more about ScienceLogic's dashboards, which display crucial metrics about collectors, their health, and devices aligned to them. The dashboard should be more detailed. Regarding improvements to ScienceLogic's technical support, my last company was IBM in India, and I worked on IBM MQ monitoring until my last day. I engaged with the LogicMonitor support team for MQ-level incidents, but these issues remained unresolved even after 10 to 15 days. On my last working day, I assisted with one such vendor case, and I am unsure if that issue was ever resolved. ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time. During my time working on MQ-level cases, including a power pack upgrade that did not fix the issues faced, I provided all necessary steps with the help of the middleware team. However, there were still gaps that needed addressing.

Read full review

Sorin Gogean

IT Infrastructure Senior Network Technician at Autoliv

Offers some features but needs better customization and analysis tools

There are solutions that can perform better, but due to pricing for our corporate implementation, we had to stay with this solution. It accomplishes the necessary tasks, but there is room for improvement. The features are not as customizable as we would prefer, but they are workable. If configured properly, you can perform a drill-down analysis. However, I have not used this feature much for our infrastructure on the network side.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"It has a lot of integration capabilities as well; we can integrate with a lot of things, monitor emails and APIs, handle customization and automation, and there is a great dashboard with many features to take advantage of."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

"Technical Support: The best I've ever experienced."

"The product provides agentless monitoring which is based on SNMP so there's no need to install the monitoring agent on each and every server."

"The whole platform overall is very powerful."

"After deploying ScienceLogic in our infrastructure and configured IT services around our critical applications we have experienced a considerable drop in major incidents which impact our customers."

"The customer service at ScienceLogic is one of the best I've experienced over the last 13 years of my career."

More ScienceLogic pros

"The solution and its interface are elaborate and fully integrate all monitored items for easy analysis and troubleshooting."

"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is it can alert you when a device is not working."

"The solution and its interface are elaborate and fully integrate all monitored items for easy analysis and troubleshooting."

"SolarWinds is flexible and works with multiple vendor devices."

"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is it can alert you when a device is not working."

"Overall, it is a good user experience and the dashboards are very usable."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is the best solution for closely monitoring how the link is performing when compared to ManageEngine OpManager."

"Link monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pros

Cons

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"The reporting module needs work."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"Reporting is still a gigantic pain point, we invest a lot of cycles in manufacturing reports off-board -#notfun."

"The overall product rating is six out of ten. It's suitable for specific customers, although slower in implementation and offering tougher ROI compared to some."

"I would like to see an expansion of the API."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring."

More ScienceLogic cons

"The initial setup is a bit complex. It's not for anyone who is a beginner to work in the products to do it."

"The data is in the system but we are unable to pull it because reporting is not integrated and versatile."

"It would be beneficial if SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could provide a feature to monitor CRC errors specifically on individual interfaces rather than the entire device. This would help in detecting intermittent issues and packet drops on main links more accurately, especially when there are CRC errors. It's important for us to be aware of these issues to avoid any voice quality problems or interruptions on our MTS links."

"There is no mobile version of this product, and our team should be able to access it using a mobile device."

"Integration with different tools, such as ServiceNow and Excel, can be improved."

"The solution lacks in performance monitoring."

"It should provide user-friendly page"

"The reporting feature needs improvement because we are unable to configure reports that were included during initial implementation."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

"The enterprise license is good for the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor. However, it is expensive, they should reduce their price."

"When compared with other solutions SolarWinds is more expensive."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is not an expensive solution."

"The product is expensive."

"I rate the product's price as three to three and a half or on a scale of one to ten, where one means low price, and ten means high price."

"I find the cost of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reasonable for our company. Though, I'm not aware of the exact licensing cost."

"Well, we had a perpetual license and the renewal was $20 to $25,000."

"The price of the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is good."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?

Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

I am not a positive person regarding SolarWinds Network Device Monitor.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

I have experience regarding the AD part, but my focus for the last 15 years has been oriented to the network side. My experience with identity tools comes more from a network perspective. We used N...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 2% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Domotz Pro vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

FortiMonitor vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

OpenNMS vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Entuity vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

April 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

April 2026

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report

Download SolarWinds Network Device Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

Network Device Monitor

Overview

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor offers comprehensive real-time network monitoring capabilities with seamless integration across multiple vendor devices, ensuring efficient network operations.

Offering features like cloud workload monitoring, quick deployment, and a user-friendly interface, SolarWinds Network Device Monitor supports real-time alert thresholds, accurate link readings, historical utilization metrics, and customizable dashboards. Its ability to integrate with multiple vendor devices and perform network discovery enhances operational efficiency. Comprehensive bandwidth and fault management features provide stable network monitoring, benefiting devices such as switches and IP phones. However, there is room for improvement in integration with tools like ServiceNow and Excel, support response times, and enhanced security. Users highlight the need for a mobile version, improved reporting, and better customization options, alongside concerns about setup complexity and licensing costs.

What are the key features?

Cloud Workload Monitoring: Monitors workloads hosted in the cloud.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers an intuitive experience for users.
Quick Deployment: Simplifies installation and setup processes.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides immediate alerts for network statuses.
Customizable Dashboards: Enhances network visibility with tailored displays.

What benefits can users expect?

Proactive Problem Solving: Real-time alerts facilitate quick issue resolution.
Efficiency: Automated network monitoring streamlines operational workflows.
Insightful Analytics: Provides valuable data on memory and CPU usage.
Cost-Effective: Monitors bandwidth and fault management to reduce outages.

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is implemented prominently in industries needing robust network infrastructure monitoring, like tech and manufacturing. Companies rely on its capabilities for IP address management, cloud workload monitoring, and remote equipment monitoring, gaining insights into system performance and ensuring compliance checks are met effectively.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Air Rarotonga

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

April 2026

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.