OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

33rd

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 1.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Real User Monitoring	1.3%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.6%
Other	98.1%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

Yasir Amin

Sr. Solution Architect, Project Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

User-level monitoring with near-real-time analytics boosts service availability

The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, from a user perspective The functions that Real User Monitor is intended for, which is to provide the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"The solution is very good at showing users ways to use a user action on a website and to see the performance."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"Product allows business analysts to create the application with very little software development time needed."

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"Ability to monitor multiple application protocols."

"What I find most valuable is that it has synthetic monitoring that you can run from different geographies and identify, as it’s more proactive monitoring than reactive monitoring, so it'll alert customers before they find out things are not working, and proactive monitoring is very helpful to most of our customers."

"The reporting feature is good for us."

"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."

"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."

"With the solution, you can easily access any issues in your infrastructure."

"If you have an old-fashioned infrastructure with data center servers then this is a good solution for you."

"It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful."

"We use RUM and BSM and so far it has been really good at getting real user transactions from a real user monitor and then tying it to a BSM single view dashboard, where we get the whole realistic picture."

"The technical support is good at resolving issues."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros

Cons

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

"Customer support is pretty average and can use some improvement."

"The product has been discontinued."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect."

"Support has experienced high turnover recently due to HP acqusition of the former Mercury Interactive product."

"This technology is considered to be older."

"When we want to monitor our encrypted traffic, this product doesn't work because our cipher is not supported."

"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."

"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."

"I have to say that I am very disappointed with this solution. It's very heavy, and it is a nightmare to deploy and maintain."

"If it is a standalone solution, however, I would not recommend Micro Focus."

"One final complaint I have is that the roadmap from the vendor is not clear, which makes it less attractive to some customers."

"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

"Not expensive."

"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."

"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Construction Company

20%

Government

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 13% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 9% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 7% of the time

IDERA Precise vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

OmniPeek vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

Sematext Synthetics vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM

Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring provides advanced capabilities in anomaly detection, proactive analysis, and alerts, enhancing monitoring proficiency with an easy-to-use interface supporting multiple application protocols.

Supporting organizations in identifying potential issues, OpenText Business Process Monitoring delivers compelling functionality for monitoring applications through synthetic monitoring across geographies. Its strategic utility extends to asset management in large ERP systems, focusing on complex transactions, real user experience modeling, and change management. Easy implementation is bolstered by advantageous licensing deals and limited development time, helping business analysts create applications swiftly. Stability and scalability add significant value, although improvement is needed in support response times post-HP acquisition, protocol support challenges, and documentation clarity. Concerns revolve around real-time analytics, tool integration, and enhanced monitoring configurations.

What are key features?

Anomaly Detection: Identifies irregularities to prevent issues before they impact performance.
Proactive Analysis: Assesses potential risks for preemptive action.
Automatic Alerts: Provides instant notifications on critical developments.
Synthetic Monitoring: Enables proactive alerts and performance assessment from multiple geographies.
Multiple Protocol Monitoring: Offers versatility in overseeing diverse application ecosystems.

What benefits should be expected in reviews?

Quick ROI: Fast returns on investment through robust monitoring features.
Easy Interface: User-friendly design reducing complexity in navigation.
Enhanced Scalability: Adaptable monitoring capabilities supporting expanding infrastructures.
Minimal Development Time: Rapid application creation with familiar scripting tools.
Advantageous Licensing: Cost-effective options leveraging existing tools and technologies.

Organizations leverage OpenText Business Process Monitoring to maintain the performance of both public and internal applications, predicting and preparing for maintenance needs. It serves critical roles in strategic change, complex transaction monitoring, and ERP workflow development across various industries, ensuring consistency and effective management of change.

OpenText

OpenText Real User Monitoring enables effective application performance tracking with end-to-end visibility. It features easy setup and helps organizations identify and resolve issues efficiently.

OpenText Real User Monitoring works by providing a single view dashboard that integrates seamlessly with BSM, facilitating application performance monitoring. It is valued for its proactive issue identification via monitoring thresholds and efficient incident resolution. Organizations can leverage its comprehensive tracking capabilities for mobile and website monitoring, yielding near-real-time analytics. However, they may face challenges like an outdated interface and limited support for non-Windows environments. Dependency on additional purchases and traditional data collection methods can be limitations. Modernizing architecture and enhancing protocol support are often desired.

What are the important features?

End-to-end application monitoring: Provides comprehensive insights and tracking.
Single view dashboard: Enables integrated monitoring experience with BSM.
Near-real-time analytics: Offers timely data on user interactions and performance.
Proactive issue identification: Utilizes monitoring thresholds to detect issues early.
Mobile and website monitoring: Extends tracking capabilities across multiple platforms.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved incident resolution: Leads to efficient problem-solving and maintenance.
Enhanced user experience: Ensures optimal application performance monitoring.
Business service agreements insights: Offers data to calculate business performance metrics.
Real-time transaction monitoring: Provides real-time data for network and performance analysis.
Comprehensive error identification: Helps pinpoint issues within application workflows.

Industries employing OpenText Real User Monitoring often use it for real-time and transaction monitoring by capturing network data to analyze performance from user perspectives. It is particularly useful for assessing availability and providing insights in environments where backend analysis and automation are essential.

OpenText

Sample Customers

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring