OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs OpenText ProVision comparison

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and OpenText ProVision are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText ProVision is ranked #48. OpenText 360 for SharePoint holds a 0.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText ProVision’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText 360 for SharePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText ProVision users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 16 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

641 Views
583 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

546 Views
322 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

OpenText ProVision

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and OpenText ProVision are competing in the enterprise solutions category. OpenText ProVision has an advantage due to its robust features tailored for advanced functionalities.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers seamless integration with Microsoft SharePoint, enhancing collaboration and content management. It supports efficient document management and workflow automation. OpenText ProVision provides comprehensive enterprise architecture features, strategic planning support, and business process management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint benefits from straightforward deployment with the Microsoft ecosystem, offering efficient customer service. In contrast, OpenText ProVision has a more complex deployment process but offers strong support to address challenges.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint is cost-effective with a reasonable ROI for SharePoint users due to simplified setup. OpenText ProVision may involve higher initial setup costs but promises a greater ROI with its extensive feature set for enterprises seeking advanced management solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

48th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	0.7%
OpenText ProVision	0.4%
Other	98.9%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Ravi Krishnan S

Head - Financial Reporting and Taxation at TVS Capital Funds

Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive

OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…

Read full review

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I would rate OpenText 360 for SharePoint as ten."

"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."

"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices."

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

"The stability of the product is very good."

Cons

"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."

"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"Sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently."

"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"It has a reasonable price."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

20%

Construction Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 36% of the time

BIC Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 33% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 31% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Visio vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 34% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 34% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 32% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

October 2025

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Metastorm ProVision

Overview

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision

November 2025

Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.