OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs OpenText ProVision comparison

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and OpenText ProVision are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText ProVision is ranked #42. OpenText 360 for SharePoint holds a 1.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText ProVision’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText 360 for SharePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText ProVision users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

1,065 Views
1,012 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

977 Views
664 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

OpenText ProVision

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and OpenText ProVision are competing in the enterprise solutions category. OpenText ProVision has an advantage due to its robust features tailored for advanced functionalities.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers seamless integration with Microsoft SharePoint, enhancing collaboration and content management. It supports efficient document management and workflow automation. OpenText ProVision provides comprehensive enterprise architecture features, strategic planning support, and business process management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint benefits from straightforward deployment with the Microsoft ecosystem, offering efficient customer service. In contrast, OpenText ProVision has a more complex deployment process but offers strong support to address challenges.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint is cost-effective with a reasonable ROI for SharePoint users due to simplified setup. OpenText ProVision may involve higher initial setup costs but promises a greater ROI with its extensive feature set for enterprises seeking advanced management solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,619 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

42nd

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	1.0%
OpenText ProVision	0.8%
Other	98.2%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."

"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."

"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers."

"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices."

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"The stability of the product is very good."

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

Cons

"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."

"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."

"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."

"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."

"The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API request calls instead of direct connectors, which could be improved."

"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."

"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."

"Sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"It has a reasonable price."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,619 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

For SharePoint, the user-friendliness needs to be improved. It is not as simple to use as GitHub, which has a very straightforward interface. I would prefer it to become more minimalistic like GitH...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 8% of the time

BIC Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

CMW Tracker vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Visio vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Rational System Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 9% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 9% of the time

SS&C Blue Prism vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 8% of the time

Apache Airflow vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

February 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

February 2026

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Metastorm ProVision

Overview

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision

March 2026

Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,619 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText ProVision report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.