Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.2
Nintex Process Platform reduces maintenance costs, increases efficiency, and provides ROI within a year despite some cost concerns.
Sentiment score
8.1
OpenText 360 for SharePoint yields 100% ROI and enhances efficiency in document management on local servers for users.
It eliminates the challenges associated with handling files on local servers and allows efficient document management.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Nintex Process Platform customer service is generally well-received, though users desire quicker assistance and note technical support limitations.
Sentiment score
6.3
OpenText 360 for SharePoint support is praised for availability, despite needing improvements in specific skills and contact issues.
I have not directly contacted vendor support but use forums for any queries or issues while utilizing OpenText 360 for SharePoint.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Nintex Process Platform is generally scalable, effective on Office 365, yet faces challenges with on-premises infrastructure and pricing.
Sentiment score
7.0
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is scalable but faces integration, storage, and threshold limitations, with varied user confidence levels.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Users generally praise Nintex Process Platform's stability, noting improvements, reliable performance, and minor disruptions, with ratings averaging seven to nine.
Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is stable but can face issues with document size and outdated Microsoft platforms affecting performance.
 

Room For Improvement

Enhancements needed in Nintex for usability, performance, integration, reporting, UI, deployment, AI integration, and support for custom code.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint needs a streamlined interface, better performance, more integrations, enhanced functionalities, and simplified licensing.
Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
Integration with a feature like Planner could assist in assigning tasks to specific individuals for follow-up.
The GUI should be improved for better user experience.
 

Setup Cost

Nintex Process Platform's subscription pricing is considered high compared to competitors, with significant costs for cloud-based user licensing.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is seen as expensive due to complex pricing, with SaaS options usually being more economical.
Nintex Process Platform is expensive.
Pricing is very affordable as it is part of the Office 365 suite, costing around five dollars per user.
In terms of pricing, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is more expensive than Microsoft.
 

Valuable Features

Nintex Process Platform offers scalable, no-code solutions with seamless integration, enhancing data management and workflow automation for enterprises.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint enhances collaboration, customization, and document management with seamless integration, real-time access, and strong security features.
My team and I created a demo using Nintex, focusing on getting emails, reading, writing, and managing attachments.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers.
It offers automation capabilities with Power Automate, enabling automation of invoicing with API support from SAP.
 

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (11th), Workload Automation (13th)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
27th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.4%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Vitor Medeiros - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers capacity to integrate with external platforms but technically difficult
There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms. When we need to develop the forms, we don't have much customization, and I think we need more flexibility there. It's technically difficult, but it would be great to be able to develop our own code and integrate it into the platform. We could then run our own code for specific actions and requests or even develop a page or form. So, if I can ask Nintex for something, it would be a way to integrate our own code for specific actions. When it comes to integration, it could have more options for custom requests.
Ravi Krishnan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive
OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Government
10%
Legal Firm
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?
The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?
Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.
What needs improvement with K2?
The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
Pricing is very affordable as it is part of the Office 365 ( /products/office-365-reviews ) suite, costing around five dollars per user. I am satisfied with the pricing.
What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API...
 

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.