Newgen OmniFlow and OpenText Process Automation compete in business process automation. Newgen OmniFlow leads in customer satisfaction with pricing and support, while OpenText Process Automation is noted for its advanced features, making it valuable for those seeking robust capabilities.
Features: Newgen OmniFlow offers dynamic case management, business process design flexibility, and strong integration capabilities via ready APIs. OpenText Process Automation shines with its comprehensive analytics and reporting tools, standard BPM and case modeler modules, and effective integration with CRM and ERP systems.
Room for Improvement: Newgen OmniFlow could enhance its low-code environment to be even more user-friendly and scalable, improve its user interface customization, and expand on its process automation capabilities. OpenText Process Automation can refine its deployment complexity, better its integration for smoother operation, and advance its lifecycle management to simplify rapid development cycles further.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Newgen OmniFlow provides a straightforward deployment model paired with strong support services, appealing to organizations seeking quick implementation. OpenText Process Automation has a complex deployment process due to its extensive customization options but offers comprehensive support to navigate this complexity.
Pricing and ROI: Newgen OmniFlow is generally more cost-effective, offering quicker ROI for budget-conscious organizations. OpenText Process Automation requires a higher initial investment but promises long-term benefits through its extensive functionalities, making it suitable for those investing in future-proof capabilities.
OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.
OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.
What are the key features?OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
