

OpenText AI Operations Management and New Relic are recognized solutions in the field of AI Operations, competing for tech buyers' attention. New Relic has a competitive edge due to positive user feedback, especially for its flexibility and data insights.
Features: OpenText AI Operations Management efficiently handles infrastructure monitoring and integrates automation, managing alerts with robust event correlation and scalability. However, it lacks cloud-hosting capabilities and can be resource-intensive. New Relic offers simplicity, extensive analytical capabilities, and performance monitoring adaptability, enabling deep insights into application behavior and issues.
Room for Improvement: OpenText AI Operations Management is considered complex with high resource demands, needing better component integration and a more modern interface. Mixed experiences are reported with its technical support. New Relic faces concerns about pricing, complexity for beginners, and occasional performance issues, with requests for improved AI operations and network monitoring features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText AI Operations Management supports complex environments, favoring on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, though it has varied technical support feedback. New Relic, primarily cloud-based, is praised for its easy deployment and wide compatibility, yet receives criticism regarding support responsiveness and service level agreements.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText AI Operations Management is viewed as expensive for smaller enterprises, with a complex licensing model that can lead to cost inefficiencies. Its automation capabilities offer cost-saving potential. New Relic varies from free to comprehensive paid plans and is often seen as costly; however, its "pay-for-what-you-use" model is appealing to startups, striving to balance functionality with affordability.
There is return on investment because since we reduced the downtime, we can definitely save a lot of money within that period.
There is a definite return on investment for New Relic, as we would not have invested in building its infrastructure if there were no returns.
After implementing New Relic, we have decreased staffing requirements while saving time and money.
If I drop an email to them, they will respond quickly to my email.
Customer support from New Relic is very good, and we rarely need to create support tickets.
They are very polite and helped him out.
OpenText goes out to bring the right people to answer any inquiries I have.
My team works with the customer success team for technical support and customer service for OpenText AI Operations Management.
We currently use New Relic for tens of thousands of developers and hundreds of teams within our organization, and we have not encountered any scalability issues.
It is also suitable for cloud native architectures, SaaS, or software as a service, and for high volume data ingestion also.
Regarding New Relic's scalability, it excels at the enterprise level for cloud integrations that can utilize tags.
The stability and scalability depend on architectural considerations and the company's specific situation.
New Relic lags sometimes.
New Relic is stable based on my experience, as I have not seen any problems with the UI.
We are following approximately 10,000 metrics and logs, and the platform performs pretty well.
If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful.
Using real-time data, if there are any malicious patterns or something happening, they can identify those.
Because of the pricing model, organizations have experienced uncontrolled costs and were not able to afford New Relic.
Normally, predictive features can be more useful, but this is an end-to-end solution that needs to be customized.
Splunk is more business-friendly due to its prettier interface.
Considering the features New Relic offers, the pricing or cost setup has not been a blocker for our budget.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for synthetic monitoring is that minions used to cost a lot.
As we talk about pricing, it is not that much cheaper.
From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours.
Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort.
New Relic is very useful for teams that don't have much of a dedicated DevOps team but want to have observability for their platform, and it's an easy way to get started.
New Relic has positively impacted our organization by reducing errors, improving performance, and saving time.
This integration ensures that when monitoring systems alert and subsequently resolve, tickets are automatically created and closed.
We have a platform where we are collecting metrics, logs, and traces for OpenText AI Operations Management, and if there is an anomaly, we directly open a ticket in our ITSM system.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| New Relic | 8.1% |
| OpenText AI Operations Management | 4.2% |
| Other | 87.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 65 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 52 |
| Large Enterprise | 80 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
New Relic offers comprehensive server and application performance monitoring features, empowering organizations with real-time insights and customizable dashboards for efficient issue resolution.
Possessing robust capabilities, New Relic provides in-depth application data, allowing users to trace and diagnose issues efficiently. Its powerful API integration enables seamless performance improvement tracking. Despite certain areas for improvement like configuration handling and pricing, New Relic remains a preferred choice for application performance monitoring, server monitoring, and infrastructure management, facilitating end-to-end observability and enhancing application health.
What are New Relic's key features?In sectors like finance and e-commerce, New Relic is utilized for real-time performance monitoring, allowing businesses to identify bottlenecks, manage infrastructure effectively, and ensure seamless user experiences. By tracking API response times and monitoring databases, companies improve performance and user satisfaction through better observability and synthetic monitoring.
OpenText AI Operations Management excels in event correlation, integrating diverse systems, and centralizing dashboards for efficient alert management. It supports extensive analysis through its data lake and enhances operational management with seamless automation and integration.
OpenText AI Operations Management is designed to consolidate monitoring inputs, enabling holistic analysis and faster root cause identification. Supporting compliance and vulnerability management, its role-based access ensures data security. With scalability and BI tool compatibility, users appreciate its ability to manage server operations efficiently in hybrid and large-scale infrastructures. Improvements are needed in UI design, setup complexity, and resource efficiency, as well as enhanced integration with third-party products and legacy applications. Comprehensive AI and predictive features, simplified licensing, and enhanced stability and reporting could further its effectiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText AI Operations Management?In industries like financial services and telecommunications, OpenText AI Operations Management is implemented for its robust event management capabilities, ensuring compliance and security standards are met. It effectively automates monitoring and server operations, providing businesses with a reliable system for data consolidation and security management.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.