McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Swimlane comparison

McAfee and Swimlane are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. McAfee is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while Swimlane is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0. McAfee holds a 0.5% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Swimlane’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Swimlane users who would recommend it.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Read 40 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

988 Views
222 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Swimlane

Read 6 Swimlane reviews

1,515 Views
1,090 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Swimlane

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Swimlane are competing products in the domain of security management and automation. Swimlane often has an edge due to advanced automation, while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is recognized for comprehensive security management.

Features: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator provides centralized security management, extensive integration with various McAfee products, and established security protocols. Swimlane offers advanced automation, customizable workflows, and high adaptability in threat response. Swimlane's advanced automation stands out compared to McAfee's more traditional approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Swimlane's deployment is flexible and scalable, with quick implementation through cloud-based solutions. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's deployment involves on-premises installation, supported by strong technical assistance. Swimlane gains an advantage in flexibility, while McAfee offers reliable support for complex infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its extensive features and integration capabilities. Swimlane, also an investment, presents value in automation leading to efficient ROI. McAfee has a higher upfront cost, but Swimlane's automated processes can result in quicker returns, benefiting organizations prioritizing automation.

To learn more, read our detailed McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Swimlane Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Swimlane

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Swimlane

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Powered Security Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Swimlane is 3.3%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

DavidJones7

Head of Content at Pharmaflow

Offers automation alert features with easy integrations and impressive scalability

I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. There are a few technical challenges with the deployment, but it can easily solved by an experienced professional but not by a beginner user of the tool. The complete implementation and migration to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator will take around three months. If someone is using a software platform already with implemented use cases in their environment, it might be difficult to implement the same use cases when the customer is migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. The conditions and prior alert settings needs to be accurate when migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, otherwise false positive alerts might get generated.

Read full review

Srikanth Nuthalapati

Software Engineering Manager at Deloitte

Great support, scalable, and easier to code

The stability of the solution has room for improvement. I would like Swimlane to provide a single space where we can go to code, build, and automate. Where we have a provision to create tables, playbooks, and tables to produce results, connect all the dots, and make the flow automated. This would make it much easier to navigate than having to jump to different places. I would like to have a single button to click that would start me on the journey of creating my own code from the ground up, from the workflow algorithm to the automation process. This would be simpler than what I had with Splunk Phantom, where I had to piece things together and connect the dots to get the full picture. With this new feature, I could create the full picture with just one button click.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"McAfee is helping us to clean all of the viruses from the machines, protecting our desktops from the latest threats."

"Technical support is very helpful."

"The most valuable features of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator are the easy-to-use console, and lots of reports, such as customized reports and inventory reports. Additionally, overall the centralized management is very good where you can see the compliance levels and inventory."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its general purpose of protecting our endpoints from infections, malicious files, and all those kinds of things. The fact that there are organized policies and policy inheritance. The general management."

"Their support is really good. I would rate it a nine out of ten. I have never any issues with their support. They always reply and follow our queries on time."

"From a single dashboard, I can take a look at several things including the endpoint protection, the file integrity section, the data activity monitor, and more."

"If you set it up right, it can really manage a very complex environment which require fine tuning where there are a lot of exceptions. That's what it caters to. It can just do those specifics in those exceptional situations, which is good."

"You have to have some experience, however, it's pretty simple to understand."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pros

"The technical support from Swimlane is very good."

"Swimlane is a very effective way to represent workflows involving multiple users."

"It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the support."

"Swimlane enables two SOC analysts to work efficiently as much as ten analysts would without Swimlane, which translates to significant manpower savings."

"Our primary goal was to reduce analyst time, and we have been successful in that."

Cons

"Features such as full drive encryption are lacking in the cloud version."

"The areas of concern where improvements are needed are related to the product's assignment policy and tag assignment, where users can assign the policies with the help of tags and sort out the systems."

"While there are bugs and a few functionality issues, it is just a matter of raising them with the support team. However, support is part of the problem as well. You want everything to be seamless in a perfect world, but the support is spread across different countries. They have Level 1, 2, and 3. Level 1 is most likely in a developing country. They don't provide the best service."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator support has been helpful. However, sometimes when I raise the case they take a while to answer. For example, the last time I used them it took them two weeks to reply back by email. No one has contacted me back since. They should improve their service."

"The impact of the agent on the endpoint's performance - the resources it takes. Additionally, the difficulties we experience with inheriting and breaking inheritance on the organization's structure breakdown for policy inheritance and then for rules inheritance. We are actually struggling with this."

"The solution could improve the EDR component in many areas, such as the zero-day and persistent threats. The implementation is also complex for this feature."

"The Virtual Patching feature needs to be improved."

"The installation process is quite difficult and requires technical support."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator cons

"I would like to see improvements in the minor bugs that occur with each update, as some features might have issues."

"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."

"We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability."

"There is a need for enhanced version control in Swimlane. Currently, our version does not support it, making it tough to move changes between environments during significant updates."

"The initial setup and deployment are complex."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"$The price of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is expensive, it is approximately $6,000 to $9,000 per license annually."

"It's an expensive solution"

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is a cheaply priced product, meaning it is not expensive since McAfee provides a free version of ePO, which includes phone support as well."

"This solution is priced in the mid-range."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is not an expensive solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"There is a license required to use this solution. If we use the additional components, such as DLP encryption, there is an additional cost. However, it is similar to a separate product altogether. If you want to use that or not, it is optional, but when you use it, it will cost you additional pricing."

"McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy O...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION ePO?

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's performance is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION ePO?

It's an expensive solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Swimlane?

It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Swimlane?

There is a need for enhanced version control in Swimlane. Currently, our version does not support it, making it tough to move changes between environments during significant updates. Furthermore, d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Swimlane?

We have been using Swimlane for security automation within our company. All the ingestions, automations, and everything within our department goes through Swimlane.

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 35% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 35% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 30% of the time

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 25% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 17% of the time

Tines vs Swimlane

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 14% of the time

Torq vs Swimlane

Compared 10% of the time

More Swimlane Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

April 2025

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

April 2025

Download Swimlane product report

Also Known As

McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO

No data available

Overview

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

McAfee

Swimlane is a leader in security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR). By automating time-intensive, manual processes and operational workflows and delivering powerful, consolidated analytics, real time dashboards and reporting from across your security infrastructure, Swimlane maximizes the incident response capabilities of over-burdened and understaffed security operations.

Swimlane was founded to deliver scalable innovative and flexible security solutions to organizations struggling with alert fatigue, vendor proliferation and chronic staffing shortages. Swimlane is at the forefront of the growing market for security automation and orchestration solutions that automate and organize security processes in repeatable ways to get the most out of available resources and accelerate incident response.

Swimlane

Sample Customers

Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke

LinkedIn, TransUnion, Citrix, Aetna, Perspecta

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Swimlane

April 2025

Free Report: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Swimlane

Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Swimlane and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Swimlane report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.