McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Splunk SOAR comparison

McAfee and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. McAfee is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.7, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. McAfee holds a 0.7% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Read 42 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

1,117 Views
626 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Splunk SOAR

Read 47 Splunk SOAR reviews

4,844 Views
3,633 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Splunk SOAR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Splunk SOAR compete in cybersecurity, each with unique advantages. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is favored for its cost-effectiveness and outstanding support, while Splunk SOAR is distinguished by its powerful automation features, which many find worth the higher price.

Features: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator offers centralized management, comprehensive endpoint security integrations, and effective configuration capabilities from a single interface. It provides automatic patch updates and virus signature reporting. Splunk SOAR has superior playbook automation, extensive integration capabilities, and customizable playbooks for detailed investigative processes, enhancing efficiency and adaptability.

Room for Improvement: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator could improve its user interface complexity, expand integration with third-party systems, and enhance real-time threat intelligence. Splunk SOAR might focus on simplifying deployment processes, reducing its hardware demands, and enhancing its documentation, making it more accessible to newer users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator facilitates straightforward deployment and offers notable support, making integration into environments seamless. In contrast, Splunk SOAR's deployment involves complexities due to its advanced features, but its responsive support helps ensure successful transitions.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is a cost-effective solution aligning well with budget-conscious implementations, ensuring greater value for security investments. Splunk SOAR, though requiring a higher initial investment, provides significant ROI through advanced automation and efficiency, appealing to those seeking long-term advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk SOAR

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.7%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk SOAR	7.7%
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator	0.7%
Other	91.6%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Binu Haneef

System Administrator at Sky News Arabia

Comprehensive security management enabled through efficient integration and automation

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator helps automate routine security tasks. We created customized automation. For example, when we did not have an EDR or XDR solution, we created tasks exclusively for detection and response automation and automatic segregation of infected PCs. The ability to customize the dashboard in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator helps us significantly. The main feature is automation for auto-segmentation and segregation. As we are in an AI era, McAfee can focus on AI tools. Instead of putting manual effort into each security-related task, it can implement more advanced automation using AI. This enhancement could improve cybersecurity significantly. Regarding the reporting area in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, we are satisfied with what we currently have. Our cybersecurity team needs customized reports beyond the default ones. We have more than 20 separate reports for identifying threats, managing, and understanding the security posture of our company and assets.

Read full review

Mack Scott

Cyber Security Network Security Engineer at Cirrus Logic

Improves response time by consolidating tools and automating threat detection

I haven't gone too far into it to see anything that needs improvement yet. We can likely include some features related to the integration with on-premises resources, rather than focusing solely on the existing automation. These are the additional features that could be included in the future. Splunk's Unified Platform does help consolidate networking security and IT observability tools. They should integrate Splunk Enterprise Security better into Splunk Cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you set it up right, it can really manage a very complex environment which require fine tuning where there are a lot of exceptions. That's what it caters to. It can just do those specifics in those exceptional situations, which is good."

"The central manager policy means we have almost all client modules in one solution."

"The policy auditing, policy management, and device auditing are all valuable features. Our customers appreciated the ability to get alerts to system-wide events from a single view."

"We get fewer false positives than with other solutions."

"Technical support is very helpful."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the central management console, which is used for DLP, endpoint security, drive encryption, and application control."

"The DLP feature in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is good."

"The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pros

"The solution’s dashboard is really good and customizable. It also has a good UI."

"The product’s integration with other Splunk products is valuable."

"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."

"Splunk has many features that make work easier, and it's simple to implement in a large production environment. Splunk collects a massive amount of data from cloud servers and handles it perfectly."

"It has definitely saved a decent amount of time for our analysts so they can focus on other tasks."

"Surprisingly, the mobile app is valuable because it is very convenient for our on-call analysts to respond and get alerted to security alerts and events wherever they are. We are able to harness the power of Splunk SOAR and everything that we are doing, and we are also able to alert our on-call analysts 24/7. From their mobile phone, they can respond to those alerts."

"The most valuable features are the Splunk SOAR apps and playbooks."

"So far, the interface is very easy to use."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"The Virtual Patching feature needs to be improved."

"The impact of the agent on the endpoint's performance - the resources it takes. Additionally, the difficulties we experience with inheriting and breaking inheritance on the organization's structure breakdown for policy inheritance and then for rules inheritance. We are actually struggling with this."

"There are some issues we are having with updating our Windows server. So we need to contact support or access our support portal."

"They have to do something to make the solution more resilient or recoverable from power failure events, which may include creating their own database."

"As for improvements, I think that putting everything on a cloud and one console would be a great idea and would be useful for customers."

"The installation process is quite difficult and requires technical support."

"The solution is difficult to tune to avoid false positives."

"We need to consolidate multiple features into one console. It would be beneficial to have all the important features on a single platform."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator cons

"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."

"have put a number of ideas on the ideas.splunk.com site for feature requests for the Splunk SOAR product. I posted one of them about three years ago, which finally got implemented in the latest release that just got announced, so the time to implement new features and things like that is a little bit concerning."

"The application does not work properly and does not pass the log-based configuration. I feel that some kind of review should happen in the application. This review should validate things so that we can get the right information. Splunk does not tell us where the IP address is associated with."

"The technical support for the Splunk SIEM solution was average."

"The creation of playbooks is complex in Splunk SOAR, and the number of integrations needs enhancement. Although it enhances alert handling, it still has a journey to compete with Palo Alto SOAR and FortiSOAR."

"The tool's response is slower because it has to search through a huge dataset, which can be improved for latency."

"Some of the training materials are on a basic level."

"Creating playbooks using the solution’s playbook editor, for me, is very cumbersome. There have been instances where I have said to myself that I just don't want to use this editor. I might just use a code block and write my own code within it... The functionality in the playbook editor is 80 percent there, but that 20 percent is still lacking. They could make it more efficient."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a license required to use this solution. If we use the additional components, such as DLP encryption, there is an additional cost. However, it is similar to a separate product altogether. If you want to use that or not, it is optional, but when you use it, it will cost you additional pricing."

"It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well."

"$The price of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is expensive, it is approximately $6,000 to $9,000 per license annually."

"McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"This solution is priced in the mid-range."

"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

"Compared to other Antivirus products, the cost of this solution is a bit high."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."

"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."

"The tool is not cheap."

"I found the price of Splunk SOAR to be good."

"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."

"The licensing cost is reasonable."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	28

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy O...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION ePO?

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's performance is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION ePO?

It's an expensive solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

The solution is free for us, which is a beneficial aspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

It would be nice if we could put it on other search heads, not just Enterprise Security. We have an ad hoc search head, and compatibility with that would be beneficial. More training classes from S...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 25% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 24% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 24% of the time

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 19% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 11% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 1% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

August 2025

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

August 2025

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO

Phantom

Overview

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

McAfee

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR

July 2025

Free Report: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.