We compared Tines and Torq across several parameters based on our user's reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Initial Setup: Tines users emphasized they spent different amounts of time on deployment and setup, so both should be considered separately, whereas Torq emphasizes considering all timeframes for deployment, setup, and implementation phases.
Valuable Features: Tines stands out with its simplicity, flexibility, and extensive integration options, offering a user-friendly interface and intuitive platform. Torq excels in enhanced privacy, easy setup, and efficient security measures, prioritizing anonymity and reliability.
Room For Improvement: Tines has room for improvement in certain areas based on user feedback, specifically in meeting expectations and satisfaction levels. Torq also has areas that need enhancement for better user experience, particularly in specific aspects.
Setup Cost: When comparing the setup costs, Tines is praised for its affordability with reasonable pricing options while Torq offers no setup cost. Tines also has a straightforward setup process and fair, transparent licensing terms, whereas Torq has a flexible licensing policy.
ROI: The ROI from Tines is positive, with increased productivity, efficiency, and cost savings. Users value the time-saving features and customization options. On the other hand, the ROI from Torq is also positive, with users experiencing significant returns and improvements in efficiency and profitability. Users appreciate the software's user-friendly interface and insightful reports and analytics.
Customer Service: Tines receives positive feedback for its assistance and support, while Torq is praised for its exceptional and professional assistance, responsive and efficient support, and friendly approach towards customers.
Tines is preferred over Torq for its simplicity, flexibility, automation capabilities, and extensive integration options. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface, drag-and-drop functionality, and the ability to configure and customize automation tasks easily. Tines also offers centralization and streamlining of workflows effectively. Users value the assistance and support provided by Tines, along with its reasonable pricing options. Torq receives positive feedback for its ROI, productivity improvements, and user-friendly interface but lacks the extensive integration options and flexibility offered by Tines.
Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points
Tines is ranked 23rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) while Torq is ranked 24th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Tines is rated 0.0, while Torq is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Tines is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane and ServiceNow Security Operations, whereas Torq is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Swimlane.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
