Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Swimlane comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
SOC as a Service (2nd)
Swimlane
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is 13.3%, down from 16.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Swimlane is 4.9%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Unique Categories:
SOC as a Service
45.5%
No other categories found
 

Q&A Highlights

HB
Sep 20, 2023
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Nov 11, 2021
Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker
In terms of improvement, it needs to be more modular. It's not. When you're working in layouts and you create specific apps within layouts, there's no portability right now in order to reuse that code across multiple layouts. I can't take a tab and say I want to use this tab on these other layouts. I have to physically go in there and recreate it from scratch, which is maddening. From an analyst perspective, it's not that hard to use. From a developer, it takes a little while in order to get to understand exactly how one would go about creating a playbook. The automation part is not that hard. It's relatively easy. It's just creating the flowchart.
Srikanth Nuthalapati - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 30, 2023
Great support, scalable, and easier to code
The stability of the solution has room for improvement. I would like Swimlane to provide a single space where we can go to code, build, and automate. Where we have a provision to create tables, playbooks, and tables to produce results, connect all the dots, and make the flow automated. This would make it much easier to navigate than having to jump to different places. I would like to have a single button to click that would start me on the journey of creating my own code from the ground up, from the workflow algorithm to the automation process. This would be simpler than what I had with Splunk Phantom, where I had to piece things together and connect the dots to get the full picture. With this new feature, I could create the full picture with just one button click.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution provides threat intelligence with EDR."
"I have found the solution very useful, it integrates well with other platforms."
"I am satisfied with the product overall."
"The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR are the remote controller from the workstation that can execute commands and isolate the systems outside of the network. Only the system with an internet connection can execute the task because the main console is in the cloud."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to configure."
"Palo Alto is easy to use."
"The Palo Alto ecosystem has a marketplace offering integration with Sentinel or other products."
"The repository of playbooks and the integration between Palo Alto and IBM QRadar are some useful features"
"It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the support."
"The technical support from Swimlane is very good."
 

Cons

"The price of the solution could be improved."
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners."
"They should provide integration with machine learning platforms."
"The formats are not compatible, are readily not available, and are not readable."
"The solution’s price and technical support could be improved."
"For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added."
"The solution's correlation rules and playbooks should be improved."
"Corex XSOAR could be improved by reducing the time it takes to process large amounts of data and increasing the number of integrations."
"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."
"The initial setup and deployment are complex."
"We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is approx $10,000 or $20,000 per year for two user licenses."
"When I first looked at Demisto, it had a price tag of $250,000 but when we finally purchased it, it was $345,000."
"The solution's cost is reasonable."
"Palo Alto offers significant discounts to customers who purchase the products repeatedly."
"From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products."
"The solution's pricing needs improvement."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is expensive."
"My company did not make any payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product since we were only using its pilot version."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Whether the product is cheap or expensive depends on the company and how much they are willing to spend on security. Nowadays, security is important. The solution is not suitable for small business...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
The solution is complicated to learn. Customers find it difficult to learn how the solution works. We need professionals to learn and understand how the tool works to expand it further. Our custome...
What do you like most about Swimlane?
It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions.
What needs improvement with Swimlane?
We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability. Sometimes we find bugs in the plug-ins. We experience some latency when we have a huge amount of data.
What is your primary use case for Swimlane?
I use the solution for receiving alerts and case creation. It is used as a ticketing system.
 

Also Known As

Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
LinkedIn, TransUnion, Citrix, Aetna, Perspecta
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Swimlane and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.