Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Swimlane Logo

Top 10 Swimlane Alternatives

Vendor: Swimlane
3.8 out of 5
Start review

Top Swimlane Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Swimlane based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, and Splunk SOAR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Swimlane surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled automation capabilities, robust scalability, and a user-friendly interface, empowering organizations to streamline operations, enhance security workflows, and achieve unparalleled efficiency in managing threats and incidents.

Swimlane Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Swimlane, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Swimlane Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Swimlane Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Swimlane is preferred for pricing and ease of deployment, excelling in automation and incident management with customizable workflows. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel offers comprehensive features and cloud integration, providing advanced analytics and threat intelligence, but with higher costs and extensive capabilities justifying long-term investments.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Swimlane Report
Swimlane offers customizable setup costs that cater to varying client needs, whereas Microsoft Sentinel typically presents a more standardized approach potentially resulting in lower initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Swimlane offers customizable setup costs that cater to varying client needs, whereas Microsoft Sentinel typically presents a more standardized approach potentially resulting in lower initial costs.
Swimlane Logo
Swimlane Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XSOAR is favored for its robust integration and competitive pricing, ensuring seamless deployment with strong customer support. In comparison, Swimlane delivers superior customization and advanced features, attracting those willing to invest more for enhanced incident response automation.
Download Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Swimlane Report
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Swimlane, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point. This cost difference may significantly impact initial budgeting decisions for organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Swimlane, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point. This cost difference may significantly impact initial budgeting decisions for organizations.
Swimlane Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.0 out of 5
Swimlane Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.0 out of 5
Swimlane attracts with simplicity and competitive pricing, fostering faster ROI through lower costs. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers advanced analytics and comprehensive features, justifying its higher price for deeper security insights and scalability, appealing to those valuing extensive capabilities.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. Swimlane Report
Swimlane offers a simpler setup with minimal costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which involves higher setup expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Swimlane offers a simpler setup with minimal costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which involves higher setup expenditure.
Swimlane Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Swimlane Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam's effective risk-based analytics appeal to firms seeking precise threat detection. In comparison, Swimlane's robust orchestration capabilities attract organizations prioritizing automation. Exabeam offers seamless integration, while Swimlane allows for customization. Exabeam's cost-benefit ratio contrasts with Swimlane's focus on long-term automation ROI.
Download Exabeam vs. Swimlane Report
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to Swimlane, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to Swimlane, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Swimlane Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
Swimlane Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
Swimlane excels in ease of integration, appealing to tech buyers needing robust system compatibility. In comparison, Tines provides enhanced automation and flexibility, ideal for those prioritizing innovative workflows. Swimlane suits traditional environments, while Tines attracts those desiring rapid deployment and scalability.
Download Swimlane vs. Tines Report
Swimlane offers a flexible setup cost while Tines provides transparent pricing details, highlighting a key variance in initial expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Swimlane offers a flexible setup cost while Tines provides transparent pricing details, highlighting a key variance in initial expenses between the two solutions.
Swimlane Logo
Swimlane Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
4.2 out of 5
ThreatConnect excels in affordability and threat intelligence analysis, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Swimlane's superior automation and orchestration justify its higher cost, attracting those seeking extensive workflows and quick response capabilities. Tech buyers choose based on cost-effectiveness versus comprehensive automation needs.
Download Swimlane vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) offers a relatively lower setup cost compared to Swimlane, emphasizing affordability and ease of implementation for businesses seeking cost-effective threat intelligence solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) offers a relatively lower setup cost compared to Swimlane, emphasizing affordability and ease of implementation for businesses seeking cost-effective threat intelligence solutions.
Swimlane Logo
Swimlane Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations excels in pricing and customer support with strong integration and automation features. In comparison, Swimlane offers advanced customization and integration with a focus on flexible security solutions, appealing to organizations seeking tailored security responsiveness despite higher initial costs.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. Swimlane Report
ServiceNow Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Swimlane requires a more involved setup process which might result in higher upfront expenses, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Swimlane requires a more involved setup process which might result in higher upfront expenses, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
Swimlane Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Swimlane Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSOAR excels in integration and ease of deployment with strong support, appealing to budget-conscious companies. In comparison, Swimlane offers advanced automation and customization, with higher initial costs but enhanced long-term ROI, ideal for enterprises seeking intricate automation features.
Download Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Swimlane Report
Fortinet FortiSOAR typically involves higher setup costs, while Swimlane offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Differences in pricing structures highlight Fortinet FortiSOAR's premium positioning versus Swimlane's appeal to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSOAR typically involves higher setup costs, while Swimlane offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Differences in pricing structures highlight Fortinet FortiSOAR's premium positioning versus Swimlane's appeal to budget-conscious users.
Swimlane Logo
Torq
1 out of 5
Swimlane Logo
Torq
1 out of 5
Torq is used for automating workflows in cybersecurity, offering valuable features like integration flexibility and real-time alerts. It allows for simplified process management while room for improvement exists in documentation quality and advanced customization options.
View comparison
Swimlane Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
Swimlane Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
IBM Resilient is favored for its incident response automation and customer support, appealing to organizations seeking seamless integration. In comparison, Swimlane attracts those desiring extensive integrations and customizable workflows, despite a steeper learning curve, justifying its cost with a rich feature set.
Download IBM Resilient vs. Swimlane Report
IBM Resilient has a straightforward setup cost, while Swimlane incurs a higher initial investment. This difference highlights IBM Resilient's approachability compared to Swimlane's potentially higher financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Resilient has a straightforward setup cost, while Swimlane incurs a higher initial investment. This difference highlights IBM Resilient's approachability compared to Swimlane's potentially higher financial commitment.
Swimlane Logo
Swimlane Logo
Google Security Operations
4.5 out of 5
Google Security Operations focuses on seamless integration with Google services, emphasizing threat detection and automated response. In comparison, Swimlane offers customizable workflows and varied deployment options, attracting tech buyers who prioritize flexibility and tailored security. Google caters to cost-effective scaling, while Swimlane enhances efficiency through customization.
Download Google Security Operations vs. Swimlane Report
Google Security Operations requires a higher setup cost compared to Swimlane, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Security Operations requires a higher setup cost compared to Swimlane, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Swimlane Logo
Swimlane Logo
Cyware Cyber Fusion
3.5 out of 5
Swimlane excels in workflow automation and integration capabilities, making it ideal for streamlined security operations. In comparison, Cyware Cyber Fusion focuses on robust threat intelligence for proactive management, appealing to organizations prioritizing collaboration and situational awareness.
Download Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Swimlane Report
Swimlane has an initial setup cost that is significantly higher than Cyware Cyber Fusion. Cyware offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Swimlane has an initial setup cost that is significantly higher than Cyware Cyber Fusion. Cyware offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in their pricing strategies.
Swimlane Logo
Swimlane Logo
Rapid7 InsightConnect
4.0 out of 5
Rapid7 InsightConnect attracts tech buyers with competitive pricing and solid support, ensuring high cost-performance. In comparison, Swimlane draws attention with its feature-rich platform, offering advanced customization and flexibility, justifying its higher cost for those seeking substantial adaptability and long-term value.
Download Rapid7 InsightConnect vs. Swimlane Report
Rapid7 InsightConnect typically involves a moderate setup cost, while Swimlane requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing approach. Rapid7 appeals to budget-conscious customers; Swimlane targets those prioritizing advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightConnect typically involves a moderate setup cost, while Swimlane requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing approach. Rapid7 appeals to budget-conscious customers; Swimlane targets those prioritizing advanced features.
Swimlane Logo
Blink Ops
1 out of 5
Swimlane Logo
Blink Ops
1 out of 5
Swimlane excels in enterprise-level automation with tailored solutions, ideal for large-scale operations seeking robust security orchestration. In comparison, Blink Ops offers superior integration flexibility, appealing to smaller enterprises with its cost-effective model and rapid deployment capabilities for versatile connectivity.
Swimlane has a moderate setup cost, whereas Blink Ops offers a significantly lower setup cost, highlighting a key cost advantage for Blink Ops.
View comparison
Pricing
Swimlane has a moderate setup cost, whereas Blink Ops offers a significantly lower setup cost, highlighting a key cost advantage for Blink Ops.

Related categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
AI-Powered Security Automation
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)