Senior Engineer at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jul 27, 2026
Swimlane offers this too, but it depends on the user's preference, similar to how some prefer Flipkart while others prefer Amazon. Since I worked with Swimlane, I felt more comfortable compared to Splunk. Regarding Swimlane's AI capabilities, I think we have pretty good security for credentials with Bitwarden, which we promote for sharing all details. Additionally, there is an architect who designs the workflows or playbooks, and development will be done based on that, which is quite good. Regarding Swimlane's AI capabilities, its accuracy and reliability are quite good. I have worked with multiple APIs, and when we have the proper credentials, everything gets done on time, the accuracy remains high, and it takes less time. We compare response times of the APIs, and since we use plugins and connectors, it depends totally on the API response and the result from the API. Swimlane automates the SOC analyst tasks. Swimane is quite good without needing any additional improvements. I would advise others to consider Swimlane as it is quite simple and user-friendly, with training provided for new customers or developers through good training materials, making it easy to learn for those unfamiliar with Swimlane. I would rate Swimlane around eight on a scale of one to ten. I feel that compared to other tools such as Splunk, which has other functionalities and was in the market before Swimlane, the reason for my rating is that Splunk provides more flexibility in writing code. You can have a custom code block to write Python scripts.
Operator technician at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Jun 28, 2026
My advice to someone who is considering using Swimlane is that they try it before implementing it, and I would say that it is one of the leading tools currently. I gave this review a rating of 9.
My advice for others considering using Swimlane is to ensure it is the right fit for you and to have someone capable of managing the Kubernetes cluster if you use it on-premises. If not, it is great to have it on the cloud, and you will definitely need people who understand Python for writing custom workflows. I would rate this solution a seven overall.
The best part of Swimlane is the persistent notifications and its ease of integration, requiring minimal coding. While it lacks response features, it can be integrated with messaging or queue services to achieve this. Any incident response requires additional integration since Swimlane itself doesn't react to incidents. Real-time data in terms of persistence is configurable, and without config, tasks persist indefinitely until completion. If using Appian versions below 11, integration features for Swimlane aren't available. By default, Swimlane lacks built-in intelligence, needing coding for integration. Although the Swimlane is beneficial and reduces manpower requirements, it's hindered by its lack of exposure. If exposed through services or endpoints, its functionality could be accessed without needing a local standalone application. On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine.
I would rate Swimlane eight out of ten. I recommend it to others because it is very easy to learn, easy to express information with, and it significantly saves time and enhances overall efficiency.
I would recommend Swimlane for those proficient with code and prepared for the maintenance efforts required. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Swimlane a seven.
I give the solution an eight out of ten. Swimlane is a great choice due to its scalability, support, stable versions, and upgrades. It is also not difficult to code with Swimlane, making it an even more attractive option. Connecting the dots is the only way to make the most of it, but that shouldn't be a deterrent from using Swimlane. The Swimlane support takes care of all maintenance on their end, giving us at least one month's notice before making upgrades or performing any other necessary maintenance. They always do this at a predetermined time. We have around 20 engineers and developers that are using the solution. New users should first gain a basic understanding of SOAR automation, then get some hands-on practice and take a training course. After that, we should be able to get started with Swimlane easily, as the support is good.
This is the best SOAR product available on the market right now and I recommend it. We are looking forward to a successful deployment, after which time we can share our use case with the public. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Swimlane provides a centralized platform for security orchestration, automation, and response. It enhances operational efficiency and reduces workloads through drag-and-drop task automation and integration capabilities.Swimlane empowers IT teams by streamlining tasks with minimal coding, offering extensive customization, and enabling efficient incident response. Its features include centralized logging, visual workflow representation, and integration with third-party tools. Swimlane's task...
Swimlane offers this too, but it depends on the user's preference, similar to how some prefer Flipkart while others prefer Amazon. Since I worked with Swimlane, I felt more comfortable compared to Splunk. Regarding Swimlane's AI capabilities, I think we have pretty good security for credentials with Bitwarden, which we promote for sharing all details. Additionally, there is an architect who designs the workflows or playbooks, and development will be done based on that, which is quite good. Regarding Swimlane's AI capabilities, its accuracy and reliability are quite good. I have worked with multiple APIs, and when we have the proper credentials, everything gets done on time, the accuracy remains high, and it takes less time. We compare response times of the APIs, and since we use plugins and connectors, it depends totally on the API response and the result from the API. Swimlane automates the SOC analyst tasks. Swimane is quite good without needing any additional improvements. I would advise others to consider Swimlane as it is quite simple and user-friendly, with training provided for new customers or developers through good training materials, making it easy to learn for those unfamiliar with Swimlane. I would rate Swimlane around eight on a scale of one to ten. I feel that compared to other tools such as Splunk, which has other functionalities and was in the market before Swimlane, the reason for my rating is that Splunk provides more flexibility in writing code. You can have a custom code block to write Python scripts.
My advice to someone who is considering using Swimlane is that they try it before implementing it, and I would say that it is one of the leading tools currently. I gave this review a rating of 9.
My advice for others considering using Swimlane is to ensure it is the right fit for you and to have someone capable of managing the Kubernetes cluster if you use it on-premises. If not, it is great to have it on the cloud, and you will definitely need people who understand Python for writing custom workflows. I would rate this solution a seven overall.
I would rate Swimlane a seven out of ten as a product.
The best part of Swimlane is the persistent notifications and its ease of integration, requiring minimal coding. While it lacks response features, it can be integrated with messaging or queue services to achieve this. Any incident response requires additional integration since Swimlane itself doesn't react to incidents. Real-time data in terms of persistence is configurable, and without config, tasks persist indefinitely until completion. If using Appian versions below 11, integration features for Swimlane aren't available. By default, Swimlane lacks built-in intelligence, needing coding for integration. Although the Swimlane is beneficial and reduces manpower requirements, it's hindered by its lack of exposure. If exposed through services or endpoints, its functionality could be accessed without needing a local standalone application. On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine.
I would rate Swimlane eight out of ten. I recommend it to others because it is very easy to learn, easy to express information with, and it significantly saves time and enhances overall efficiency.
I would recommend Swimlane for those proficient with code and prepared for the maintenance efforts required. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Swimlane a seven.
Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.
I give the solution an eight out of ten. Swimlane is a great choice due to its scalability, support, stable versions, and upgrades. It is also not difficult to code with Swimlane, making it an even more attractive option. Connecting the dots is the only way to make the most of it, but that shouldn't be a deterrent from using Swimlane. The Swimlane support takes care of all maintenance on their end, giving us at least one month's notice before making upgrades or performing any other necessary maintenance. They always do this at a predetermined time. We have around 20 engineers and developers that are using the solution. New users should first gain a basic understanding of SOAR automation, then get some hands-on practice and take a training course. After that, we should be able to get started with Swimlane easily, as the support is good.
This is the best SOAR product available on the market right now and I recommend it. We are looking forward to a successful deployment, after which time we can share our use case with the public. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.