

![Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_64/2wuq6mq8liciuy8jm6aqj4dp5bgm.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum compete in cybersecurity, focusing on server protection and endpoint detection. Kaspersky has the upper hand due to advanced detection capabilities and comprehensive features.
Features: Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] provides real-time scanning, virus protection, and virtualization, which allows it to install on the virtualization node instead of all guests. It also includes virtual patching to safeguard against threats. Kaspersky offers advanced threat hunting, system hardening, vulnerability management, and automated response features like quarantining based on threat severity, driven by machine learning and behavioral analysis.
Room for Improvement: Trend Micro could enhance integration options and expand its feature set for modern threats. Its reliance on legacy systems may require updates for comprehensive security. Kaspersky could improve ease of use for non-experts and reduce the technical requirements for utilizing advanced features. It may also benefit from clearer reporting options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] offers straightforward deployment but lacks advanced options and integration support. Kaspersky provides flexible deployment models, including cloud and hybrid solutions, with superior customer service and support infrastructure, facilitating an easier operation and enhanced management.
Pricing and ROI: Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is cost-effective, making it suitable for businesses on a budget with satisfactory ROI. Kaspersky requires a higher initial investment, but the advanced features assure substantial ROI, justifying the cost through improved security and operational efficiency.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
I have seen a return on investment with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, as this product is offered at a minimal cost, and we can find a good ROI from it.
I have observed value for money from Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
Compared to other solution providers, the responses are not very clear when we need support.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
For technical support, Kaspersky provides two kinds: purchased support for real-time assistance and normal support during working hours.
Technical support is top-notch.
The technical support of Trend Micro ServerProtect deserves an 8.5 out of 10.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum can expand from Endpoint Detection and Response to Extended Detection and Response and then threat intelligence solutions.
It is very easy for me to scale.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
The deployment duration is proportional to the number of users to deploy or the number that needs protection.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
I would rate stability for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum as nine; it is pretty stable, a very good, stable product.
I would assess the impact of real-time malware scanning on server security as continuously and exponentially growing.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
The uninstallation needs better handling, specifically with automatic license deletions.
SonicWall can integrate with other products such as Sophos, SentinelOne, and several others, but not with Kaspersky.
Use analytics to identify anything that is outside the normal behavior of files and systems in the course of business operation, then flag it so it can go for further evaluation.
They need to improve in this area by providing more documentation and custom scripts for bulk enterprise deployments.
It's more about awareness and maintaining competitive pricing because competition is growing.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
Threat Response Automation in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is quite effective for enhancing security.
In the past month, we encountered an unknown type of malware, but the behavior was sufficient for Kaspersky to isolate the network based on this behavior, which proved very efficient.
The main benefit is security posture.
From my reseller and consultant perspective, the most beneficial aspects of Trend Micro ServerProtect are its user-friendly console, allowing anyone to configure policies easily, and the excellent support provided.
Customers consider competitive pricing and features when selecting Trend Micro ServerProtect, but trust is definitely a crucial factor.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum | 1.0% |
| Trend Micro ServerProtect | 0.8% |
| Other | 94.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] offers robust server and endpoint protection with antivirus and malware detection. It's designed for seamless integration with existing infrastructure, focusing on data loss prevention and real-time threat insights.
Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] provides centralized management through the cloud, ensuring comprehensive security without the need for separate agents on virtualization nodes. While it boasts features like virtual patching and a straightforward interface, there's a call for improved integration and more intuitive console features. Users appreciate its competitive pricing and minimal maintenance but express a need for enhancements in deployment, analytics, and notification options.
What are the key features of Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]?In industries like finance and healthcare, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is deployed to secure data and applications such as SharePoint and OneDrive. It's used in hybrid environments where protecting against ransomware and ensuring endpoint security are critical. While the platform supports important security operations, users seek improved policy setup processes and additional features like vulnerability management and device blocking.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.