Top 10 Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Alternatives

Name: Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]
Brand: TrendAI
Rating: 4.0 (18 reviews)

Vendor: TrendAI

4.0 out of 5

18 reviews
87% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] surpasses its competitors by providing comprehensive antivirus and anti-malware protection, real-time scanning, and centralized management for servers, ensuring enhanced security and streamlined administration without compromising system performance.

TrendAI Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with TrendAI, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon delivers advanced EDR capabilities with cloud-native architecture and AI-driven protection for real-time threat management. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] provides core antivirus features and virtualization support, making it ideal for cost-sensitive server environments.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon users report ease of setup as a significant advantage, while Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] has mixed reviews on cost and complexity of installation.

View comparison

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon users report ease of setup as a significant advantage, while Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] has mixed reviews on cost and complexity of installation.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] offers cost-effective malware protection and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint delivers advanced threat intelligence and seamless cloud integration, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security and support. Both provide unique advantages catering to different business needs.

Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Report

Pricing

Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] incurs a significant setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a key difference in startup expense between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a comprehensive, AI-driven security solution with advanced threat detection and scaling efficiency. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is favored for its centralized management but is less adaptable to modern security needs and environments.

Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a moderate setup cost compared to Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL], which often incurs higher setup expenses. Trend Micro's [EOL] status also indicates limited future updates and support compared to SentinelOne.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR offers AI-driven endpoint security and streamlined incident response, appealing to organizations prioritizing advanced threat prevention. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect provides robust anti-malware detection and virtualization features, suitable for those seeking competitive pricing and extensive security compliance.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Report

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL], which is now discontinued, highlighting a potential cost savings with an alternative setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL], which is now discontinued, highlighting a potential cost savings with an alternative setup.

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security excels in threat isolation and seamless deployment, appealing to those seeking modern endpoint solutions with reliable support. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] offers robust server security suitable for legacy systems but may present future support challenges due to its end-of-life status.

Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Report

Pricing

HP Wolf Security's setup cost is competitive, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] presents a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

HP Wolf Security's setup cost is competitive, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] presents a higher initial investment.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

3.9 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

3.9 out of 5

Trellix emphasizes comprehensive management with DLP features, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] focuses on anti-malware and virtualization with competitive pricing, appealing to cost-sensitive users. Both have strengths in security, catering to varied enterprise needs.

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Report

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers straightforward setup costs, while Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] has been known for higher initial fees that may increase overall adoption cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers straightforward setup costs, while Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] has been known for higher initial fees that may increase overall adoption cost.

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient appeals with its competitive pricing and extensive integration, ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking VPN and endpoint security. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] offers advanced features like robust virtualization and anti-malware protection, suited for cloud-hosted environments desiring comprehensive security.

Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiClient has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL], highlighting Fortinet as a more economical choice for initial configuration. Trend Micro's setup cost reflects its advanced capabilities and services.

View comparison

Pricing

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix offers comprehensive patch management and endpoint visibility, ideal for complex infrastructures. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect focuses on server-specific protection, suitable for those prioritizing virtual patching and anti-malware, providing an adaptable solution across cloud environments.

Download BigFix vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Report

Pricing

BigFix offers straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] entails higher initial setup expenses, making BigFix a more cost-effective solution in terms of deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Cynet

4.4 out of 5

Cynet

4.4 out of 5

Cynet offers autonomous breach protection and 24/7 SOC services, appealing for robust security needs. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is noted for its anti-malware capabilities and centralized management, ideal for users focused on virus protection over advanced threat detection.

Download Cynet vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Report

Pricing

Cynet offers cost-effective setup, while Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] might demand more initial investment. Cynet appears budget-friendly in comparison to Trend Micro's higher upfront pricing requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

WatchGuard EPDR

4.2 out of 5

WatchGuard EPDR

4.2 out of 5

Trend Micro ServerProtect EOL focuses on streamlined threat detection for legacy systems. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers advanced threat hunting and automated response capabilities. Trend Micro provides cost-effectiveness, while WatchGuard appeals to enterprises prioritizing comprehensive and adaptive security.

Download Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report

Pricing

Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is noted for a low setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR stands out with its seamless and automated installation process, highlighting a clear distinction in the initial deployment experience.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 6 more products

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)