We performed a comparison between Infor LN and PeopleSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are manufacturing, and manufacturing costing modules. These are all powerful features of Infor LN."
"The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"Infor LN has basically the same structure as CloudSuite Industrial, but LN has more advanced planning tools for manufacturing."
"LN is definitely a stable product. It's number one on Gartner's four quadrants."
"We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"The initial setup is easy."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"It's not too hard to handle the initial setup."
"Scales up very well."
"It's very fully featured. It has more features and more configurability than SAP."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"Job data is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of PeopleSoft is the functionality that allows the ability to find all the data about employees that are needed."
"It is a very stable ERP solution. It is also supported on Oracle Cloud and provides extensive features."
"PeopleSoft is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is IDE."
"When you have a bug in the system, you get some kind of alert. They should explain those alerts more."
"While Infor LN incorporates the latest business processes and functions, there is always room for improvement as the business grows. In the new normal, it could stand to incorporate quite a few automation processes like the RPA and utilize machine learning in the Internet of Things."
"From a technical perspective, LN needs to work on customization and integration. It's fairly expensive for many clients to migrate from a customized private solution to the cloud. Infor needs to improve the cloud solution to make the migration from the on-prem customized solution faster and smoother. Otherwise, many clients will find it difficult or expensive to do."
"When it comes to planning, it's more challenging to consider the entire structure, such as having a specific SKU and wanting to look at the planning for the whole structure. You must delve into individual item details to plan for it with order planning. Therefore, improvements will allow more comprehensive planning for each SKU."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"From a customers' perspective, Infor LN covers most of the processes in the company, but sometimes, they have to choose other tools because of the functionality or the cost of the Infor solution. It covers the core functions of the company—such as financial, operations, logistics, and so on—very well, but it doesn't cover some parts such as invoices, digitization, etc."
"The interface can be difficult sometimes. I need to apply a bar code system, such as business intelligence and user interface tools. The user has to be a technician sometimes to use it."
"Stability is an area where the solution lacks and needs to be improved."
"The area that could be improved is the upgrade process, it's not the easiest. Oracle stopped supporting our version. So we have to move either to the cloud or work in a non-supported situation. That was certainly a disadvantage. That's also the reason why we decided not to stay with Oracle. Now we are moving to SAP."
"The learning and development side of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."
"Services that need improvement include PeopleSoft Query, Pivot Grids, and PeopleSoft Test Framework."
"If there is another release, they should look at going to mobile computing to stay competitive."
"We have already deployed it and we have had it for several years but we are switching to a modern HCM SaaS cloud product."
"There can occasionally be complexity in the initial setup."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 24 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 11th in ERP with 80 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while PeopleSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and SAP S/4HANA, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and SAP ERP. See our Infor LN vs. PeopleSoft report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
